Bingyang Cai1, Shize Jiang2, Hui Huang1, Jiwei Li1, Siyu Yuan1, Ya Cui1, Lihong Tang1, Liang Chen2, and Jie Luo1
1School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 2Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Brain Connectivity, Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Using high quality atlas of the
structural connectome, and direct recording of neuronal activity by stereotactic-EEG (SEEG), this study investigated the relationship
between neuronal signal connectivity at different seizure stage and the white
matter scaffold. The results show electrical signal spectral coherence and phase synchronization are significantly stronger between
structurally connected nodes within short distance, while at the time of
pre-seizure and seizure onset, high frequency (>80Hz) signal may propagate
through longer distance with structural connections.
Introduction
Brain
structural networks are the scaffold that supports neural transmission, yet the
underlying interactions between them remains unclear1,2. White matter
tractography based on diffusion MRI has been a powerful technique to capture
structural networks3. Population-averaged atlas
of the structural connectome has been built to allow further studies of the
brain scaffold4,5. Stereotactic-EEG
(SEEG) has the advantage of direct measurement of electrophysiological neuronal
activities with high SNR and high temporal resolution6, which can map three-dimensional epileptogenic networks avoiding craniotomy7. It is by far one of
the most accurate approaches to confirm source of epileptogenicity for drug
refractory epilepsy patients8. In this study, we investigate
the relationship between neuronal signal connectivity at different seizure
stage recorded by SEEG and underlying white matter connectome. Methods
Data
acquisition:
In this IRB approved study, 15 drug-refractory temporal lobe epilepsy patients
were recruited. CT and MRI structural images
were acquired on routine clinical system. The SEEG system consisting of 8-16
contacts. The SEEG setup with a sampling rate of 2kHz, was used to continuously
record patients’ neuronal activities.
Data
processing:
Anatomical co-localization
of SEEG electrodes was performed by the iEEGview toolbox with preoperative MRI
and post-implanted CT images. The cortex of brain is parcellated into different
regions of interest according to Destrieux atlas9,10. All SEEG
data were band-pass filtered at 1–512 Hz. The event of seizure from SEEG
recording was selected by experienced physicians. Signal recording around event
of seizure from each electrode was segmented into three segments: pre-seizure
(1 minute before seizure onset moment), seizure onset, and post-seizure (1
minute after seizure onset moment), and each of them lasts 30 seconds. In
addition, resting state of 30 seconds was chosen from time period at least 1
hour away from event of seizure.
SEEG functional connectivity:
The SEEG coherence with a 1s time window was
computed using a Hamming taper11. The coherence was computed in the frequency bands:
delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz), beta (13–30
Hz), gamma (30–80 Hz), high frequency of ripple (80-250 Hz) and fast ripple
(250-500 Hz). The coherence in each period was averaged across all time windows
and frequency bands.
In addition to
the spectral coherence, we also evaluate the strength of phase synchronization
between electric signals―phase lock value (PLV)11,12, which was defined as:
$$PLV=|\frac{1}{N}\sum_{t=1}^{N}{e^{i(\phi _{x}-\phi _{y})t} }|$$
where $$$\phi _{x}$$$,$$$\phi _{y}$$$ were the relative
phase of electric signals after the Hilbert transform, $$$t$$$ was the time window. The
PLV strength was computed in 1s time windows and averaged for each segment,
respectively. For ROI-wise analysis, the coherence and PLV was calculated as
the average of those nodes in the same ROI.
DTI structural
connectivity:
The HCP-1065 DTI template was applied for white matter connectivity analysis4. The tractography was performed automatically with
DSI-studio (http://dsi-studio.labsolver.org). The anatomical scans were parcellated into 198 ROIs
using the Destrieux atlas10. The count values of streamlines between two paired ROIs
were placed in a connectivity matrix to generate the structural network for the
template brain. For the individual analysis, to
match the sparse SEEG ROIs, only the structural nodes in the regions sampled by
SEEG electrodes would be extracted and calculated as structural connectivity
nodes (Fig. 1). Through the individual brain structural connectivity, the path
length of graph theory defined as the smallest number of edges traversed
between two nodes was calculated to evaluate the direct/indirect anatomical
connectivity between ROIs13.
The inter-node distance of paired ROIs was
defined as the average anatomical distance between SEEG electrodes.
Statistical tests: In
order to evaluate the relationship between functional connectivity and structural
features (structural connectivity, inter-node
distance, path length), the main effects were evaluated using a one-way ANOVA test. Otherwise,
T-tests were performed for all pair-wise comparisons between structural
features.Results
Across all different neuronal activity
frequencies, regardless of seizure or resting state, mean functional coherence connectivity
between structurally connected nodes was significantly stronger compared to structurally
disconnected nodes (Fig. 2A); When taking the inter-node distance into consideration,
only structurally connected nodes within short distances (<3 cm) exhibit much
higher connectivity strength (Fig. 2B); Node pairs with direct white matter
connectivity (path length=1) had significantly higher functional connectivity
than those with indirect connections (path lengths longer than 1) (Fig. 2C).
Further, for high-frequency electrical signal (ripple and fast ripple) that
appears pre-seizure and at seizure onset, structurally connected nodes at
longer distances (3-6cm and >6 cm) also exhibit significantly higher connectivity
compared to structurally disconnected nodes at the same distance (Fig. 3). The
paired nodes with structural connection within short distances or with direct
connection also exhibit higher PLV strength (Fig. 4). All of the structural
features (structural connectivity, inter-node distance, path length) have exhibited a
significant effect on functional coherence connectivity and PLV networks (Table 1).Conclusion
Our
study analyzed the relationship between neural electrical activity and white
matter connectivity, showing dependence of spectral coherence and phase
synchronization on structural features, including structural connectivity, path
length, and node distance. These findings highlight the interdependence of
functional and structural networks in the human brain. Acknowledgements
N/AReferences
1. Avena-Koenigsberger A, Misic B, Sporns
O. Communication dynamics in complex brain networks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;19(1):17-33.
2. Park HJ, Friston K.
Structural and functional brain networks: from connections to cognition. Science. 2013;342(6158):1238411.
3. Bota M, Sporns O,
Swanson LW. Architecture of the cerebral cortical association connectome
underlying cognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 2015;112(16):E2093-2101.
4. Yeh FC, Panesar S,
Fernandes D, et al. Population-averaged atlas of the macroscale human
structural connectome and its network topology. Neuroimage. 2018;178:57-68.
5. Yeh FC.
Population-based tract-to-region connectome of the human brain and its
hierarchical topology. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4933.
6. Englot DJ, Konrad
PE, Morgan VL. Regional and global connectivity disturbances in focal epilepsy,
related neurocognitive sequelae, and potential mechanistic underpinnings. Epilepsia. 2016;57(10):1546-1557.
7. Mullin JP, Shriver
M, Alomar S, et al. Is SEEG safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of
stereo-electroencephalography-related complications. Epilepsia. 2016;57(3):386-401.
8. Englot DJ. A modern
epilepsy surgery treatment algorithm: Incorporating traditional and emerging
technologies. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;80:68-74.
9. Li G, Jiang S, Chen
C, et al. iEEGview: an open-source multifunction GUI-based Matlab toolbox for
localization and visualization of human intracranial electrodes. J Neural Eng. 2019;17(1):016016.
10. Destrieux C, Fischl
B, Dale A, Halgren E. Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci
using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage.
2010;53(1):1-15.
11. van Mierlo P,
Papadopoulou M, Carrette E, et al. Functional brain connectivity from EEG in
epilepsy: seizure prediction and epileptogenic focus localization. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;121:19-35.
12. Lachaux JP,
Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ. Measuring phase synchrony in brain
signals. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(4):194-208.
13. Chu CJ, Tanaka N,
Diaz J, et al. EEG functional connectivity is partially predicted by underlying
white matter connectivity. Neuroimage. 2015;108:23-33.