Keywords: Gray Matter, Susceptibility
Although sickle cell anaemia (SCA) affects the brain, causing stroke and neurocognitive complications, its pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) reveals alterations in tissue composition. Therefore, we applied QSM to investigate changes in brain susceptibility in 168 SCA patients compared to 47 healthy controls scanned at 1.5 Tesla in Tanzania. We found a significant susceptibility decrease in SCA vs. controls in the caudate nucleus and globus pallidus and a significant increase in susceptibility in the red nucleus and dentate. Blood haemoglobin levels had a significant positive correlation with susceptibility in the globus pallidus, caudate nucleus and putamen.
This work is supported by the EPSRC-funded UCL Centre for Doctoral Training in Intelligent, Integrated Imaging in Healthcare (i4health) (EP/S021930/1)
1.Piel, F. B., Steinberg, M. H., & Rees, D. C. “Sickle Cell Disease”. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(16), 1561–1573, 2017
2. Tian Liu, Cynthia Wisnieff, Min Lou, Weiwei Chen, Pascal Spincemaille, and Yi Wang. “Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping”. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 69(2):467–476, 2013.
3. Pascal Spincemaille, Alexey Dimov, and Yi Wang. “Correction of Residual Echo-to-Echo Phase Inconsistencies in Readout Phase Corrected Multi-Echo Gradient Echo for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping”. In 4th International Workshop in MRI Phase Contrast & Quantitative Susceptbility Mapping, page 145, 2016.
4. Anita Karsa and Karin Shmueli. “SEGUE a Speedy rEgion-Growing algorithm for Unwrapping Estimated phase”. Proc. Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB, Paris, France, PP:666, 2018.
5. Tian Liu, Ildar Khalidov, Ludovic de Rochefort, Pascal Spincemaille, Jing Liu, A. John Tsiouris, and Yi Wang. “A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF)”. NMR in Biomedicine, 24(9): 1129–1136, 2011.
6. Anita Karsa, Shonit Punwani, and Karin Shmueli. “An optimized and highly repeatable MRI acquisition and processing pipeline for quantitative susceptibility mapping in the head-and-neck region”. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 84:3206–3222, 2020.
7. S.M. Smith. “Fast robust automated brain extraction”. Human Brain Mapping, 17(3):143-155, November 2002.
8. Li X, Chen L, Kutten K, et al. “Multi-atlas tool for automated segmentation of brain gray matter nuclei and quantification of their magnetic susceptibility”. Neuroimage, ;191:337-349 2019.
9. Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, J. M. and Smith, S. M. “Improved Optimisation for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images”. NeuroImage, 17(2), 825-841, 2002.
10. Wei Li, Bing Wu, Anastasia Batrachenko, Vivian Bancroft-Wu, Rajendra A Morey, Vandana Shashi, Christian Langkammer, Michael D De Bellis, Stefan Ropele, Allen W Song, et al. Differential developmental trajectories of magnetic susceptibility in human brain gray and white matter over the lifespan. Human brain mapping, 35(6):2698–2713, 2014.
11. Russell Murdoch, “Developing MRI Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping to Investigate the Effect of Sickle Cell Anaemia on Brain Magnetic Susceptibility”, PhD thesis, University College London, 2022
12. Murdoch, R; Kawadler, J; Kirkham, F; Shmueli, K; (2019) MRI susceptibility mapping suggests elevated brain iron in sickle cell anaemia. In: Proceedings of the ISMRM 27th Annual Meeting & Exhibition. SMRT 28th Annual Meeting. (pp. pp. 1-3). International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM)
13. Xin Miao, Soyoung Choi, Benita Tamrazi, Yaqiong Chai, Chau Vu, Thomas D. Coates, and John C. Wood. Increased brain iron deposition in patients with sickle cell disease: an mri quantitative susceptibility mapping study. Blood, 132:1618, 10 2018.
Figure 1: QSM and ROIs in an axial slice of a representative patient with SCA: (a) the susceptibility map; (b) coregistered T1W image with ROIs shown in one hemisphere: caudate – green, putamen – blue, globus pallidus – yellow, thalamus – brown.
Figure 2: ROI mean susceptibility plotted as a function of ln(age) for each of the regions of interest. Linear fits for both the SCA patients and healthy controls are shown on each plot together with their 95% confidence intervals (shaded). The vertical dotted line on each plot shows the location of the mean SCA patient age, given by ln(14.9) = 2.70, used as a reference for age correction.
Figure 3: Table showing the results of ANOVA assessing the difference between the age-corrected mean susceptibility values for SCA subjects vs controls in each of the regions. Significance scores (p values) are shown in the final row, with statistically significant results (p<0.05) highlighted in bold.
Figure 5: Table showing the results of ANOVA on the members of the cohort with haemoglobin measurements. P values are shown for the effect of SCA in the combined group and for the effect of haemoglobin in both the combined and SCA only groups with statistically significant results (p<0.05) highlighted in bold.