Keywords: Brain Connectivity, fMRI (resting state), tinnitus
As a common disorder, the development of tinnitus deserves the attention of neuroscientists. The present study combined fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and functional connectivity to explore brain functional abnormalities in transition from recent-onset to chronic tinnitus. Abnormal intraregional neural activity and functional connectivity were observed in the left middle frontal gyrus and left dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus during the development of chronic tinnitus, and these regions are major components of attention network and executive control network. These findings provide us with a better understanding of the aberrant brain changes and neuropathophysiological mechanisms of the progression of tinnitus.
1. Jastreboff PJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res. 1990;8:221–254.
2. McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, Hall D. A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hear Res. 2016;337:70–79.
3. Zou Q-H, Zhu C-Z, Yang Y, Zuo X-N, Long X-Y, Cao Q-J, Wang Y-F, Zang Y-F. An improved approach to detection of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: Fractional ALFF. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;172:137–141.
4. Fox MD, Zhang D, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME. The Global Signal and Observed Anticorrelated Resting State Brain Networks. J Neurophysiol. 2009;101:3270–3283.
5. Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE, Stewart BJ, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Myers PJ, Newman CW, Sandridge S, Turk DC, et al. The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear. 2012;33:153–176.
6. Yan C-G, Wang X-D, Zuo X-N, Zang Y-F. DPABI: Data Processing & Analysis for (Resting-State) Brain Imaging. Neuroinformatics. 2016;14:339–351.
7. Chen J, Hu B, Qin P, Gao W, Liu C, Zi D, Ding X, Yu Y, Cui G, Lu L. Altered Brain Activity and Functional Connectivity in Unilateral Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Neural Plast. 2020;2020:9460364.
8. Song P, Lin H, Liu C, Jiang Y, Lin Y, Xue Q, Xu P, Wang Y. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Middle Frontal Gyrus During Attention Modes Induced Dynamic Module Reconfiguration in Brain Networks. Front Neuroinform. 2019;13:22.
9. Beevers CG, Clasen PC, Enock PM, Schnyer DM. Attention Bias Modification for Major Depressive Disorder: Effects on Attention Bias, Resting State Connectivity, and Symptom Change. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015;124:463–475.
10. Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167–202.
Figure1. fALFF differences between chronic tinnitus patients, recent-onset tinnitus patients and healthy controls.The comparison of fALFF between the three groups. ANCOVA of standardized fALFF maps between the three groups showed significant differences in fALFF values in the left MFG, orbital parts (warm colors).
ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; ROT, recent-onset tinnitus; fALFF, fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations; MFG, middle frontal gyrus.
Figure 2 | Regions showing seed-based FC differences between three groups.
Note: ANCOVA of standardized FC maps between the three groups showed significant differences in fALFF values in the left DLSFG (warm colors).
ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; ROT, recent-onset tinnitus; fALFF, fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; DLSFG, superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral.
Figure 3 | Correlation coefficients between altered fALFF, FC values, and different tinnitus characteristics.
Note: fALFF, fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations; FC, functional connectivity; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; DLSFG, superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral; LM, loudness matching; TFI-C, cognitive complaints.
Table 1 | Demographic and clinical characteristics of chronic tinnitus patients, ROT patients and HCs.
Note: χ2/F values were obtained using chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis test respectively for comparisons between three groups, and the corresponding P values were derived. P2 were obtained using a Bonferroni multiple comparison for determining statistically significant changes between each group. P* < 0.05 indicates a significant difference. ROT, recent-onset tinnitus; HCs, healthy controls; PTA, Pure-tone audiometry.
Table 2 | Tinnitus characteristics of chronic tinnitus patients and ROT patients
Note: P* < 0.05 indicates a significant difference. ROT, recent-onset tinnitus; PM, pitch matching; LM, loudness matching; VAS, visual analogue scales; TFI, Tinnitus Functional Index; TFI-I, Intrusiveness of tinnitus; TFI-SC, sense of control, TFI-C, cognitive complaints; TFI-SL, sleep disturbance; TFI-A, auditory difficulties; TFI-R, relaxation; TFI-Q, quality of life relaxation; TFI-E, emotional distress.