Shahrokh Abbasi-Rad1,2,3,4 and David Norris1,2
1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany, 3Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 4Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: fMRI, Magnetization transfer, Arterial Blood Contrast
Arterial blood contrast (ABC) uses on-resonance binomial pulse
for magnetization transfer preparation to saturate the tissue signal and highlights
the contribution of arterioles. Previously, using Bloch-McConnel simulations,
we showed that Binomial MT contaminates ABC with T2 contrast. We
suggested the use of adiabatic null passage to decrease the T2
effect. We performed Bloch-McConnel simulations at 3T and 7T comparing the
performance of binomial and ANP pulses. ANP increased the arterial contribution
from 32% to 42% at 3T and from 18% to 30% at 7T. This study concludes that ANP
reduces the T2-contamination imposed by binomial MT block and
improves ABC.
Introduction
BOLD
contrast indirectly measures neuronal activation through the presence of
deoxyhemoglobin in tissue [1] making GE-EPI the optimum sequence. Spin echo
EPI was proposed to increase the
specificity of the signal change to capillaries by refocusing the static
dephasing around large vessels [2]. However, BOLD contrast relies on changes in deoxyhemoglobin making it
specific to capillary and post-capillary vessels, whereas CBV-based imaging improves
the specificity by better localizing the source of neuronal activity [3]. We showed that the use of an on-resonance magnetization
transfer (MT) pulse efficiently saturates the signal from tissue increasing the
sensitivity to changes in blood volume, which we termed: arterial blood
contrast (ABC) [4]. Previously, by using McConnel equations, we incorporated
MT into conventional signal modeling, and showed that binomial pulses impose
significant T2 contamination upon the ideal contribution of the
arterioles through direct saturation of free pool [5]. Here, we suggested the use of Adiabatic Null
Passage (ANP) pulse to partly resolve this issue. Method
The
total signal detected from a parenchymal voxel is the summation of four
components:
S(TE) = ∑(i=1:4)xiMiexp(-R2i*TE)
where i corresponds to arterioles, capillaries, venules, and
tissue; xi to
the weighting factor determining their contribution to the total signal; Mi to
the steady-state magnetization; R2i* to
the effective transverse relaxation rate. The relative signal weighting for
each component is given by xi = viCi, where vi represents
the volume fraction, and Ci is the fractional water content.
The grey matter (GM) protons exist in two different pools: a liquid
highly mobile (water), and a relatively restricted semi-solid pool (macromolecules),
among which the magnetization transfers through a cross-relaxation process [6]. Bloch-McConnell equations [7] model the MT by extending Bloch equations:
dM/dt = A.M + C
where =
[Max, May, Mza, Mzb] is the
combined magnetization vector for free (a) and bound pool (b), C =
[0, 0, R1a.M0z, R1b.M0b] is given by longitudinal
rates and equilibrium magnetizations. A is a 4x4 matrix shown in Fig 1a. Δωa represents
the RF offset relative to the Larmor frequency; k the magnetization exchange
rate; R1 and R2 relaxation rates; Rrfc the
line-shape (G(Δω): super-Lorentzian function [8]) of the GM bound pool given by:
Rrfc(Δω) = ω12πG(Δω)
To
accurately calculate the Mi values, we numerically simulated the Bloch-McConnell
equations using the simulator provided in [7]. We simulated the steady-state magnetization of the parenchymal
components in our previously performed experiment [4]. We compared the effect of two MT pulses (figure 1). The
parameters used in the simulation were as follows: MT: comparing i) a
binomial MT block consisting of two non-selective on-resonance binomial RF
pulses with phase swap (6ms) with ii) an on-resonance ANP
TR-FOCI pulse, with the phase being reversed at the mid-point of the phase
modulation function (6ms) to yield zero flip at the end of the RF pulse time
course. The MT block is followed by a 3-ms random spoiler. GM bound pool:
is characterized by T2 = 11 μs, Kab =
2.4 Hz, T1 = 1 sec, and the pool size fraction of fb = M0b/M0a
= 0.072 [6]. Pulse sequence: two measurement volumes (assuring that
MT is built-up) with 30 slices per volume. TRvolume/TRslice
=2s/66ms, and flip angle of 50 . We introduced τ, as the time between two successive MT
pulses in an imaging volume, and deployed the high power of ANP to apply it less
often ( τ= 2*TRslice) than the binomial block (τ = TRslice). Physiological: the volume
fractions at rest were 0.945 (tissue), 0.0116 (arteriole), 0.0253 (venule), and
0.0181 (capillary) [9]. We assumed a 30% increase in volume fraction for the vasculature
upon activation. The fractional water content, independent of activation, is
0.89 (tissue) and 0.87 (blood) [10]. The field-strength-dependent relaxation parameters are
reported in tables in figures 3 and 4. The signal change upon activation is
given by:
ΔS(TE) = ∑(i=1:4)xi,actMi,actexp(-R2i,act*TE) - ∑(i=1:4)xi,restMi,restexp(-R2i,rest*TE)Results
The simulations and
modeling were performed at 3T and 7T with identical physiological parameters. The
magnetization transfer ratios (MTR) were reported in figure 2. The signal change
diagrams are shown for 3T(figure3) and 7T(figure4). Considering the ideal echo
time for ABC (TE = 0), the signal change in figure 3-b (red plot: dashed (ANP)
vs solid (binomial)) shows that ANP MT increased the arterial component contribution
to the total signal change from 32% to 42%. Figure 4 suggests that although this
increase of arterial blood contrast is from 18% to 30% when we use ANP instead
of binomial at 7T, however, there is low sensitivity for ABC at 7T.Discussion
To
the best of our knowledge, among fMRI signal modeling studies [11, 12], this is the first to consider the MT effect.
Using binomial MT, the blood components showed higher MTR values than expected [13] due to the T2-relaxation, which
manifests as a contamination of the desired ABC by T2. The ANP pulse
has a high power which allowed us to apply it less often in comparison with the
binomial decreasing this T2 contamination. Figures 3 and 4 showed
that the ANP pulse increases the specificity of the eventual ABC contrast to
the arterioles and is less affected by the imperfections of the RF hardware.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Ogawa, S., et al., Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic
resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine, 1990. 14(1): p. 68-78.
2. Boxerman, J.L., et al., MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic
susceptibility perturbations. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 1995. 34(4): p. 555-566.
3. Lu, H., et al., Functional magnetic resonance imaging based on changes in vascular
space occupancy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003. 50(2): p. 263-274.
4. Schulz, J., et al., Arterial blood contrast (ABC) enabled by
magnetization transfer (MT): a novel MRI technique for enhancing the
measurement of brain activation changes. bioRxiv, 2020.
5. S Abbasi-Rad, D.N. Bloch-McConnell Simulation for Arterial
Blood Contrast @ 3T and 7T. in Organization
for Human Brain Mapping. 2022. Glasgow, Scotland.
6. Sled, J.G., and G.B. Pike, Quantitative imaging of magnetization
transfer exchange and relaxation properties in vivo using MRI. Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine, 2001. 46(5): p.
923-931.
7. Zaiss, M., et al., A combined analytical solution for chemical
exchange saturation transfer and semi‐solid magnetization transfer. NMR in
Biomedicine, 2015. 28(2): p.
217-230.
8. Li, J.G., S.J. Graham, and R.M.
Henkelman, A flexible magnetization
transfer line shape derived from tissue experimental data. Magnetic
resonance in medicine, 1997. 37(6):
p. 866-871.
9. Chai, Y., et al., Integrated VASO and perfusion contrast: A
new tool for laminar functional MRI. NeuroImage, 2020. 207: p. 116358.
10. Lu, H., et al., Sustained poststimulus elevation in cerebral oxygen utilization after
vascular recovery. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2004. 24(7): p. 764-770.
11. Markuerkiaga, I., et al., Estimation of laminar BOLD activation
profiles using deconvolution with a physiological point spread function.
Journal of neuroscience methods, 2021. 353:
p. 109095.
12. Akbari A, B.S., Ali TS, Barth M, Modelling the depth-dependent VASO and BOLD
responses in human primary visual cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 2022.
13. Stanisz, G.J., et
al., T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization
transfer in tissue at 3T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005. 54(3): p. 507-512.