Jiaen Liu1
1Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Magnetization transfer, Neurofluids
Imaging mass
exchange between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain parenchyma tissue is promising
for enhancing our understanding about the role of CSF in clearance of metabolic
waste and contributes to clinical diagnosis of neurological disorders and
degeneration. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of achieving this
goal based on the magnetization transfer effect and CSF-selective spin echo
contrast at 3 T in human subjects. The results suggested that techniques with
low sensitivity to flow and partial volume effect are required for robust
clinical application.
Introduction
Mass exchange between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and
brain parenchyma contributes to clearance of metabolic waste specifies which are
risk factors of dementia [1]. Recently, imaging the
water exchange noninvasively based on the magnetization transfer (MT) effect
was demonstrated using mouse models of different age [2]. Because of the very
different ventricle size and CSF velocity between mice and humans, it remains
to be seen whether this contrast mechanism can be a useful tool for clinical
applications. Here, we measured the MT saturation ratio (MTR) in CSF at 3 T.Methods
MRI
experiments
Experiments
were performed on a 3 T MRI scanner (Prisma, Siemens). Two young male subjects
were enrolled according to an approved local IRB protocol. To selectively
saturate parenchyma tissue, a series of on-resonance short T2-selective
saturation pulses [3] were applied before image
acquisition in 9 slices at 9 delay times (TD: 7 ms, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2, 3, 4
and 5 s) as shown in Fig. 1. The slice order was shifted over repetitions (TR)
to acquire the saturation recovery signal at different TDs for all slices. Each
block of saturation pulse was 6 ms long and included 16 hard pulses with an RF
amplitude of 19.6 μT.
Twelve such blocks were performed with a period of 250 ms in oneTR. Spin-echo (SE) images
were acquired with a single shot EPI readout using a SENSE factor of 3, in-plane
resolution of 2.5x2.5 mm2, slice thickness of 3 mm at five echo
times (TE: 30, 60, 90, 160 and 320 ms). A control scan was carried out by
turning off the saturation pulses.
Data
analysis
The saturation
ratio due to MT (MTR) was calculated based on the magnitude of the images from
the saturation ON and OFF scans as 1-MagON/MagOFF, for
each TE respectively. A CSF mask was generated based on the magnitude image at
TE=320 ms. The decay rate R2 was calculated using least square
nonlinear fitting of the multi-echo magnitude data at each TD. Variation of R2
across TDs was calculated. The rationale was that CSF voxels that
were contaminated by tissue signal would show a TD (or saturation)-dependent R2 variation.
CSF voxels were ranked based on this R2 variation level in five bins. The
bin with the lowest variation was considered to encompass the least amount of
partial volume effect from tissue.Results
Fig. 2
shows the saturation level of MTR from one slice of one subject at different
TEs and TDs. About 50% MTR was introduced in brain parenchyma at TD=7 ms and
decreased at higher TDs (Fig. 2 top). In CSF voxels, those showing the highest
MTR were near the border of the lateral ventricle or in the subarachnoid space
around the brain (Fig. 2 middle). Interestingly, MTR in CSF voxels with the
long TE=320 ms showed higher levels of positive and negative values, suggesting
stronger signal instability (Fig. 2 bottom, see discussion).
To isolate the partial volume effect, MTR at
TE=30 ms from CSF voxels in the bins of the lowest and highest R2
variation are shown in Fig. 3 for two subjects, along with the difference of R2
relative to the control scan. It can be seen that the mean MTR from the low
variation bin was 5% and 7% in the subjects at the first TD. There was a trend
of saturation-induced R2 decrease at shorter TDs, especially in the
high variation group, possibly due to the partial volume effect.
The distribution of CSF voxels with different
levels of R2 variation is shown in Fig. 4 for one subject. Lower
variation voxels tend to be found in the center of the lateral ventricle.Discussion
In this
study, the effect of saturation transfer between tissue and CSF was investigated
in human subjects at 3 T. Between 5-10% of MT-induced saturation was observed
in 20% of CSF voxels with the lowest cross-TD R2-variation. Whether
this R2 variation-based filtering eliminates partial volume effect
remains to be confirmed. Unlike the previous study based on mice [2], MTR in CSF calculated from long
TE SE signal showed strong instability. This apparent effect could be caused by
the fast CSF velocity in the order of tens of mm/s in human subjects compared to
less than 1 mm/s in mice [4], which also depends on the physiological
status [5]. Outflow effect can reduce the long
TE signal by missing the refocusing RF pulse. Future studies can potentially
improve the long TE signal stability by using non-selective refocusing pulse or
gradient echo signal and flow-compensated acquisition. The observed MTR
level in CSF was also smaller than that in mice, possibly caused by the reduced
surface-to-volume ratio and stronger diluting effect due to faster flow in
humans.Conclusion
Imaging water exchange between CSF and brain
parenchyma based on magnetization transfer can potentially be used to assess
the health condition of brain tissue. Methods that are less sensitive to
partial volume and flow effect are needed to fully establish its validity in
clinical applications.Acknowledgements
Thanks to Peter van Gelderen and Jeff Duyn for useful discussion and sharing the MRI sequence. This research was supported by the faculty startup fund from UT Southwestern Medical Center.References
[1] J.
J. Iliff et al., “A Paravascular Pathway Facilitates CSF Flow Through
the Brain Parenchyma and the Clearance of Interstitial Solutes, Including
Amyloid β,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 4, no. 147, pp.
147ra111-147ra111, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748.
[2] A. M. Li, L. Chen, H. Liu, Y. Li, W.
Duan, and J. Xu, “Age-dependent cerebrospinal fluid-tissue water exchange
detected by magnetization transfer indirect spin labeling MRI,” Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 2287–2298, 2022, doi: 10.1002/mrm.29137.
[3] P. van Gelderen, X. Jiang, and J. H.
Duyn, “Rapid measurement of brain macromolecular proton fraction with transient
saturation transfer MRI,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 2174–2185,
2017, doi: 10.1002/mrm.26304.
[4] J. Li et al., “Whole-brain
mapping of mouse CSF flow via HEAP-METRIC phase-contrast MRI,” Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 2851–2861, 2022, doi:
10.1002/mrm.29179.
[5] Y. Wang et al., “Cerebrovascular
activity is a major factor in the cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics,” NeuroImage,
vol. 258, p. 119362, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119362.