Alex A Bhogal1, Yunjie Tong2, Eva van Grinsven3, Jaco J.M. Zwanenburg1, and Marielle E.P. Philippens3
1Center for Imaging Science, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States, 3Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
Keywords: Neurofluids, Neurofluids
We use Blood Oxygen Level Dependent BOLD in combination with
controlled hypercapnic stimulus to investigate the relationship between
presumed cerebral blood volume changes and CSF flow in the brain. In a group of
11 subjects, we observe strong CSF inflow to the brain as a result of
contracting cerebro-vasculature conforming to the Monro-Kellie Doctrine. Our
results suggest that changes in arterial blood gases may provide an ‘engine’
through which to potentially enhance the clearance of waste from the brain.
Introduction
The high metabolic rate of the brain requires an effective
clearance mechanism to remove byproducts and maintain homeostasis. However, the
brain lacks a conventional lymphatic system, which in the rest of the body
collects and clears metabolic waste. Although the exact pathways of brain waste
clearance remain controversial, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial
fluid (ISF) are generally considered as major carriers of waste products. To
date, most research on brain clearance has been limited animal research where
findings have focused on arterial dynamics such as heartbeat and vasomotion as
critical motive forces of clearance (by propelling CSF and ISF)1,2.
Van Veluw et al.3
have shown that increasing the amplitude of vasomotion by means of visually
evoked vascular responses results in increased clearance rates in the visual
cortex of awake mice. In human studies, the low frequency dynamics such as
vasomotion4,
and slower dynamics as observed in sleep appear to be major drivers of
clearance5.
This observation raises the speculative, but intriguing, question of whether
clearance is evoked by other factors that modulate brain-wide vascular
dynamics, such as CO2 breathing challenges. As a first step towards
answering this question, we analyzed CSF dynamics in the 4th
ventricle following CO2 breathing challenges, and related these
observation to the whole-brain BOLD response curves.Methods
Data Acquisition: Data were retrospectively selected from the ongoing
Assessing and Predicting Radiation Influence on Cognitive Outcome using the
cerebrovascular stress Test (APRICOT) study. A subset of 11 patients with brain metastases were included
who were scanned on a 3T Philips (Best, The Netherlands) system using a multi-slice GE-EPI sequence (BOLD-fMRI) throughout a controlled manipulation of
arterial blood gases using a RespirAct system (Thornhill Research, Canada). MRI parameters were: TR=1050ms,
TE=30ms, α=65°, resolution=2.292x2.292x2.5mm3, matrix=96x96, slices=51, volumes=1000,
multi-band factor=3. The respiratory paradigm consisted of a 5 minute
resting-state period followed by a 90s hypercapnic block (+10mmHg), 120s
baseline , 180s progressively increasing hypercapnic ramp
(max=+12mmHg), 90s baseline, 180s hyperoxic block (target 680mmHg) and final
120s baseline period. Baselines were clamped at individual subject’
resting PetCO2 values (figure 1). In a single subject, CSF inflow
was evaluated in response to consecutive 20s inspiratory breath-holds followed
by three hypercapnic blocks.
Data Processing:
MRI data were preprocessed using FSL6. Steps included brain
extraction (BET), distortion correction (TOPUP) and temporal realignment
(MCFLIRT). Respiratory traces were interpolated to the TR of the MRI scans and
a bulk alignment between the average whole brain signal and resampled PetCO2
trace was done using functions from the seeVR toolbox7. The last two slices of the
MRI data were used to calculate CSF inflow. Here, a manual segmentation of
voxels containing CSF at the 4th ventricle was performed. From here, the voxel
containing either the highest magnitude signal or highest temporal noise to
signal (tNSR) was manually selected depending on which gave highest contrast.
CSF signals were smoothed and de-trended. The grey matter (GM) MRI signal was
smoothed and the temporal derivative was calculated as a surrogate for CBV
change4.
The same was done for the PetCO2 trace (see figs).Results
A typical single subject example is shown in figure 1. Group
average (n=11) end-tidal traces, BOLD signal responses and their respective
time derivatives are shown in figure 2 along with the CSF inflow response. Note
that whole CO2 changes result in inflow signal, changes in O2
do not since transient O2 is not vasoactive. The
delay between the peak rate of CO2 change and the peak inflow
response was 5.1+/-6.0s – this was subject to bulk-alignment errors and averaging of hemodynamic lag effects throughout
the GM tissue. The delay between the peak rate of BOLD signal change and the
peak inflow response was 1.5+/-1.2 seconds. Finally,
although not quite as abrupt, endogenous CO2 accumulation via breath-holding
was sufficient to modulate CBV and induce a notable inflow effect (see
figure3). Discussion
Our main finding was that changes in arterial CO2
levels, whether through strong controlled stimuli or simple breath-hold,
strongly modulate CBV (as measured through the BOLD signal proxy4).
This supports the notion that CSF flow (and potentially glymphatic flow) may be
driven by vascular mechanisms, and so validates the model proposed by Yang et
al. since we not explicitly drive vasodilation4. On a more speculative note, these findings
suggest that presumed CVR response delays may be driven, in part, by mechanical
resistance related to the excretion of CSF from the intra-cranial space through
the 4th ventricle; i.e. space needs to be made for blood. This is
suggested by the inverse relationship between inflow and d/dt(GM BOLD).
Limitations: In this perspective study, planning of the BOLD
acquisition was not always optimal for observing CSF flow at the 4th
ventricle. Besides, the patient group exhibited varying degrees of edema as a
result of brain metastases and treatment effects, which might have affected the
results. Future work should include a prospective study, and ideally should aim
to explicitly assess clearance function. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Mestre
H, Tithof J, Du T, et al. Flow of cerebrospinal fluid is driven by arterial
pulsations and is reduced in hypertension. Nature
communications. 2018;9(1):4878.
2. Iliff JJ, Wang M, Zeppenfeld DM, et
al. Cerebral arterial pulsation drives paravascular CSF-interstitial fluid
exchange in the murine brain. JCBFM 2013;33(46):18190-18199.
3. van
Veluw SJ, Hou SS, Calvo-Rodriguez M, et al. Vasomotion as a Driving
Force for Paravascular Clearance in the Awake Mouse Brain. Neuron. 2020;105(3):549-561.e545.
4. Yang HS, Inglis B, Talavage TM, et
al. Coupling between cerebrovascular oscillations and CSF flow fluctuations
during wakefulness: An fMRI study. JCBFM. 2022;42(6):1091-1103.
5. Fultz
NE, Bonmassar G, Setsompop K, et al. Coupled electrophysiological,
hemodynamic, and cerebrospinal fluid oscillations in human sleep. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2019;366(6465):628-631.
6. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens
TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage.
2012;62(2):782-790.
7. Bhogal AA. seeVR: a toolbox for
analyzing cerebrovascular reactivity data. Zenodo.
2021;(v1.01).