Leonardo A. Rivera-Rivera1, Grant S. Roberts1, Anthony Peret1, Sterling C. Johnson1, Oliver Wieben1, Laura Eisenmenger1, and Kevin M. Johnson1
1University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Neurofluids, Velocity & Flow, Aging
In this study, we investigated diurnal
changes in cerebral hemodynamics from 4D-Flow in a large population of
cognitively healthy older adults and in a younger group of healthy volunteers. To
separate physiological and technical variability of 4D-Flow measures,
volunteers were scanned at 7am, 4pm, and 10pm on the same day three times for
each timepoint. Data supports strong cerebral blood flow fluctuations of physiological
origin that are much higher than the technical variability.
Introduction:
4D-Flow MRI is a non-invasive technique that can
be used to provide comprehensive characterization of cerebral hemodynamic
fluctuations, including measures of cardiac pulsations and vasomotion that are
hypothesized to drive glymphatic flow and waste clearance. 4D-Flow studies have
identified altered vascular dynamics in Alzheimer’s subjects; however,
hemodynamic variability in cognitively normal individuals has not been well
established.1,2 Circadian rhythms can lead
to hemodynamic changes and have been implicated to aid in brain metabolite waste
clearance.3 Further, disruptions of
circadian rhythms have been associated with various hallmark proteinopathies of
common neurological disorders.4 Therefore, the purpose of
this study was to improve our understanding of the technical and diurnal
physiological variations in 4D-Flow vascular measures in cognitively normal
participants. This was achieved through retrospective analysis and prospective
test-retest scanning of subjects throughout the day.Methods:
Subjects: A data repository of 750 cognitively normal
older adults was studied.5 In that dataset, 572 participants
were scanned in the morning (<12pm) and 158 in the afternoon (>12pm). To
control for the effects of age and sex, 158 participants from the morning group
were propensity score matched to the afternoon group (morning 67 ± 8yrs, 115f ;
afternoon 67 ± 8yrs, 113f).6 In addition, 7 young healthy
volunteers were recruited (26±4y, 2F) for prospective, repeated studies. MRI: Neurovascular 4D-Flow data were
acquired on 3.0T scanners (GE Healthcare) with a 3D radial sequence.7 Imaging parameters
included: Venc = 80cm/s, imaging volume = 22x22x16cm3, 0.75mm3
isotropic resolution, TR/TE = 7.8/2.2ms and scan time ~5.6min. Image
reconstruction of 20 cardiac phases was performed retrospectively.8 Data were background phase
and velocity aliasing corrected.9 In prospective studies,
participants were scanned at 7am, 4pm, and 10pm. At each time point, 3 scans
were performed with the participant taken out of the room after the first scan
and repositioned for two consecutive scans. Flow measurements were performed in
MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA) on the dynamic data using a semi-automated
centerline process that extracted the vascular tree.10 Dynamic blood flow was
quantified in the internal carotid (ICA), basilar (BA) and middle cerebral
arteries (MCA). Pulsatility index (PI) was calculated from flow curves:
(Qmax-Qmin)/Qmean, Q=flow. Non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum and signed rank
tests were used to study group differences (statistically significant
P<0.05). A stepwise regression linear model was used to determine
explanatory predictor variable effects on the larger data repository sample. Predictor
variables included MRI time of day, fasting time, heart-rate, sex, and age. Outcome
variables were total cerebral blood flow (TCBF) (ICAs+BA) and cerebral
pulsatility index in the ICAs and MCAs. Linear correlation and Bland-Altman
analyses including Pearson and repeatability coefficients were calculated to
characterize young volunteers within and across session variability. Results:
Significantly higher TCBF and lower cerebral
pulsatility were observed in participants scanned in the morning compared to
those scanned in the afternoon even after matching for age and sex (Fig. 1). Stepwise
regression analysis on the complete 750 participant sample showed age and time
of MRI as the only co-variates that significantly explained TCBF (P<0.001, R2=0.14)
and cerebral pulsatility (P<0.001, R2=0.38). Young volunteers exhibited
throughout-day variability; TCBF decreased with time of day in most volunteers
(Fig. 2). Box plots summarizing volunteer data showed a similar trend to
observations in the large data repository with decreasing TCBF and increasing
cerebral pulsatility in the afternoon (Fig. 3). Inter-session mean
normalization revealed very low variability in TCBF at 10pm. Intra-session linear
correlation and Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated low levels of variability in
TCBF measures in both repositioning and back-to-back scan conditions, with
Pearson and repeatability coefficients of 0.98 and 5.5% respectively (Fig. 4,
left column). Cerebral pulsatility measures in the ICAs were more variable with
Pearson and repeatability coefficients of ~0.58 and ~25% respectively (Fig. 4, right
column). Inter-session comparisons (Fig. 5) showed high levels of variability
in TCBF measures (Pearson coeff. ~0.24 and repeatability coeff. ~38%) (left
column); however, inter- and intra- session cerebral pulsatility variability
were very similar (Pearson coeff. ~0.44 and repeatability coeff. ~0.25%) (right
column).Discussion and Conclusions:
Significant diurnal cerebral hemodynamic
variability was observed in cognitively healthy older participants. Morning scan
sessions were associated with larger perfusion and lower cerebral pulsatility, even
after age and sex matching. In prospective volunteer experiments, TCBF mostly decreased
throughout the day. Test-retest data including repositioning and back-to-back conditions
showed low levels of TCBF variability (repeatability coefficient ~5%) demonstrating
high intra-session repeatability. However, throughout-day TCBF variability was
high (repeatability coefficient ~38%) likely due to circadian rhythms and
neurovascular coupled metabolic demand. Cerebral pulsatility displayed similar
levels of variability within and across sessions (both repeatability
coefficients ~25%), with higher within session but lower across session
variability compared to TCBF. This finding suggests that in young volunteers cerebral
pulsatility is less sensitive to daily metabolic changes and more related to
vascular function. In this study, we have observed physiological cerebral hemodynamic
fluctuations throughout the day in older and younger participants. Highly
reproducible cerebral blood flow measurements support the conclusion that fluctuations
are from physiological origin. Results indicate time of scan needs to be
included in multi-variable regression analysis of cerebrovascular and perfusion
studies. Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge research support from GE Healthcare, and
funding support from the Alzheimer's Association (AARFD-20-678095) and from NIH
grants R01AG075788, R21AG077337, R01AG021155, P30AG062715, UL1TR002373, and F31AG071183.References
1. Rivera-Rivera
LA, Eisenmenger L, Cody KA, et al. Cerebrovascular stiffness and flow dynamics
in the presence of amyloid and tau biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement (Amst)
2021; 13: e12253–e12253.
2. Conroy DA, Spielman AJ, Scott RQ. Daily
rhythm of cerebral blood flow velocity. J Circadian Rhythms 2005; 3: 3.
3. Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, et al. Sleep drives
metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science 2013; 342: 373–377.
4. Nedergaard M, Goldman SA. Glymphatic
failure as a final common pathway to dementia. Science 2020; 370: 50–56.
5. Roberts GS, Peret A, Jonaitis EM, et al. Proc. Intl.
Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 30 (2022) #0007
6. Ho D, Imai K, King G, et al. MatchIt:
Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference. Journal of
Statistical Software; Vol 1, Issue 8 (2011),
https://www.jstatsoft.org/v042/i08 (2011).
7. Johnson KM, Lum DP, Turski PA, et al.
Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 2008; 60: 1329–1336.
8. Liu, J, Redmond MJ, Brodsky EK, et al.
Generation and visualization of four-dimensional MR angiography data using an
undersampled 3-D projection trajectory. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
2006; 25: 148–157.
9. Loecher M, Schrauben E, Johnson KM, et
al. Phase unwrapping in 4D MR flow with a 4D single-step laplacian algorithm. J
Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 43: 833–842.
10. Schrauben E, Wåhlin A, Ambarki K, et al.
Fast 4D flow MRI intracranial segmentation and quantification in tortuous
arteries. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2015; 42:
1458–1464.