Kianush Karimian-Jazi1,2, Volker Sturm1, Katharina Schregel1,2, Jessica Hunger1,3, Verena Turco3,4, Noah Enbergs1, Berin Boztepe1,3, Manuel Fischer1, Yannik Streibel1, Nikolaus von Knebel-Doeberitz5, Andreas Korzowski6, Steffen Görke6, Florian Kroh6, Mark E. Ladd6, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer5, Daniel Paech5,7, Christopher B. Rodell8, Michael Platten3,4, Wolfgang Wick2,9, Sabine Heiland1, Martin Bendszus1, and Michael O. Breckwoldt1,3
1Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, 2Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DTK) within the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 3Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DTK) within the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 4Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany, 5Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 6Department of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 7Clinic for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany, 8School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 9Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
Synopsis
Keywords: CEST & MT, High-Field MRI, Glioma
CDNP-R848, an experimental
immunotherapeutic TLR7/8 agonist, showed
high treatment efficacy with a significant tumor volume reduction and led to a re-normalization
of the metabolic properties (MTRex Amide, MTRex Amine and MTRex NOE) of the tumor in relation to the healthy brain,
with distinct differences to vehicle treatment. The clinical relevance of CEST imaging
appears to be localizing active tumor areas and a better understanding of tumor
heterogeneity. In the future, we aim to better characterize the origin of the
CEST contrast by correlated histological and spatial metabolic analysis.
Background
MRI
is the main modality for the initial diagnosis of primary brain tumors and for differentiating
them from brain metastases or other intracranial lesions. However, differentiation
between tumor progression and pseudoprogression, as well as dissecting
metabolic information, remains challenging as sensitivity and specificity of
current advanced imaging techniques are limited.1 Here we hypothesized that chemical exchange
saturation transfer (CEST), a non-invasive imaging technique based on
magnetization transfer from protons in biomolecules to water2, can detect metabolic changes that occur during
immunotherapy of glioma. Methods
CEST imaging was implemented at a 9.4 T Bruker small
animal MRI scanner. First, sequence stability was tested in a test-retest design
in healthy male C57BL/6 mice (n=6 mice). To assess CEST imaging in glioma, we
used the GL261 glioma model. Gl261 cells were orthotopically implanted into the
right striatum of 17 female C57BL/6 mice. Eight mice were treated with the
experimental immunotherapeutic TLR7/8 agonist CDNP-R8483 (14, 17 and 20 days
post-implantation), while the remaining mice (n=9) received CDNP vehicle
control. Longitudinal MRI was performed before (week 2 after implantation),
during (week 3) and after therapy (week 4) and included T2w and CEST. Images
were evaluated by segmentation of the tumor and normalization with the
contralateral, healthy brain parenchyma.Results
Test-retest reliability
showed a good stability of the sequence with comparable values in all three MTRex
signals (Amide, Amine, NOE) at three different
time points and in different mice (n=6) (Fig.1). In the Gl261 glioma
model, CDNP-R848 led to partial response that was characterized by a re-normalization
and significant increase in the MTRex signaling ratio (tumor/healthy brain)
over the treatment course (comparison 2nd week vs. 4th
week: MTRex Amide: p=0.0071; MTRex
Amine: p=0.0005; MTRex NOE: p=0.0004), while CDNP vehicle treated mice showed
progressive disease and a consecutive CEST ratio drop over time (comparison
2nd week vs. 4th week: MTRex Amide: p<0.0001; MTRex Amine: p=0.0003; MTRex NOE:
p=0.0002; Fig.2a/b). There was pronounced tumor heterogeneity in the MTRex signals, notably in the MTRex-amide signal in the late tumor stage of control mice, whereas the T2w-RARE signal was predominantly homogeneous (week 3, Fig.3).Discussion
CDNP-R848 showed high
treatment efficacy and led to a re-normalization of the metabolic properties of
the tumor in relation to the healthy brain, with distinct differences to vehicle
treatment. The clinical relevance of CEST imaging appears to be localizing
active tumor areas and a better understanding of tumor heterogeneity. In the future, we plan to better characterize the origin of the CEST contrast by including both histological and spatial metabolic analyses.Conclusion
CEST
imaging is a promising approach to analyze molecular and metabolic
heterogeneity in glioma models and, ultimately, patients.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Young, R. J. et al. Potential utility of conventional MRI signs in diagnosing pseudoprogression in glioblastoma. Neurology 76, 1918-1924, doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821d74e7 (2011).
2. Mamoune, K. E., Barantin, L., Adriaensen, H. & Tillet, Y. Application of Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) in neuroimaging. J Chem Neuroanat 114, 101944, doi:10.1016/j.jchemneu.2021.101944 (2021).
3. Rodell, C. B. et al. TLR7/8-agonist-loaded nanoparticles promote the polarization of tumour-associated macrophages to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Nat Biomed Eng 2, 578-588, doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0236-8 (2018).