Qingling Song1, Ye Li1, and Ailian Liu1
1Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Pelvis, Cancer
Ovarian cancer is a common fatal malignant tumor in clinic, and it is also
a malignant tumor in the female reproductive system, which is third common followed
cervical cancer and uterine cancer. It is easy to metastasize, among which
peritoneal implantation is a common way of metastasis in the early stage.
Synopsis
Ovarian cancer is a common fatal malignant tumor in clinic, and it is also
a malignant tumor in the female reproductive system, which is third common followed
cervical cancer and uterine cancer. It is easy to metastasize, among which
peritoneal implantation is a common way of metastasis in the early stage.Summary of main Findings
This study
showed that the standADC, slowADC and f values in peritoneal
metastasis positive group were significantly lower than those of peritoneal
metastasis negative group. The standADC, was the only independent factor
for predicting peritoneal metastasis. The f value had the best predicted
performance with the highest AUC 0.754 and the highest specificity 84.21%,
however, slowADC had the highest sensitivity 85.71%.Introduction and Purpose
Ovarian cancer is a common fatal malignant tumor in clinic, and it is also
a malignant tumor in the female reproductive system, which is third common
followed cervical cancer and uterine cancer [1]. It is easy to metastasize,
among which peritoneal implantation is a common way of metastasis in the early
stage. About 75% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer have extensive
peritoneal implantation metastasis [2].Materials and Methods
33 ovarian cancer patients pathologically confirmed with
40 lesions were divided into peritoneal metastasis positive group (19 lesions) and peritoneal
metastasis negative group
(21 lesions). MR examinations included T1W, T2W, IVIM imaging were performed
within two weeks before surgery. All patients were
scanned using a 1.5 T MR scanner (GE Signa HDXT) with eight-channel body matrix
coil. The specific scanning parameters are shown in Table 1. The ROI
of the lesion was manually drawn along the contour of the solid portion of tumor
at the largest slice in the IVIM parameter maps (Figure 1). The quantitative parameters
of Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) including the standard apparent
diffusion coefficient (standADC), low apparent diffusion coefficient (slowADC),
fast apparent diffusion coefficient (fastADC) and perfusion fraction (f) were measured. The independent sample t-test or
Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the differences in the parameter
values between the two groups. ROC curve was used to calculate the parameters
with the statistical difference to evaluate the predicted performance of peritoneal
metastasis. Binary
logistic regression analysis predicted the independent risk factors of peritoneal
metastasis in Ovarian cancer.Results
Patient Characteristics
Of the 33 ovarian cancer patients with 40 lesions finally
enrolled, 19 lesions were in the peritoneal metastasis
positive group, 21 lesions were in the peritoneal
metastasis negative group.
Agreement on Imaging Parameters among the Three Observers
The three
observers had high consistency on measurements of the standADC, slowADC,fastADC and f values with
the inter-class correlation coefficients higher than 0.75.
IVIM Parameters Between Peritoneal Metastasis Positive and
Negative groups
The standADC, slowADC and f values in peritoneal metastasis
positive group were significantly lower than those of peritoneal metastasis
negative group (Table 2). The standADC, slowADC and f were involved in the
Logistic analysis, multivariate analysis revealed the standADC was the only
independent factor for predicting peritoneal metastasis.
The performance of IVIM Parameters to predict peritoneal
metastasis
ROC curves for IVIM parameters standADC, slowADC
and f to predict peritoneal metastasis were shown in Fig. 2. The f value had the best predicted performance with the
highest AUC 0.754 and the highest specificity 84.21%, however, slowADC had the
highest sensitivity 85.71% (Table 3).Discussion and Conclusion
The standADC, slowADC and f
values in peritoneal metastasis positive group were significantly lower than
those of peritoneal metastasis negative group. The standADC, was the
only independent factor for predicting peritoneal metastasis. The f
value had the best predicted performance with the highest AUC 0.754 and the
highest specificity 84.21%, however, slowADC had the highest sensitivity
85.71%. The results showed that the ovarian cancer with positive peritoneal
metastasis had high density, large number and small internal and external
space, the activity of water molecules in tumor tissue was obviously limited,
and the ADC value was lower than that of ovarian cancer with negative
peritoneal metastasis. It is suggested that ADC value has a certain value in
predicting peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer. IVIM-DWI removes the
influence of microcirculation perfusion, eliminates the weakening of DWI signal
caused by false diffusion of blood flow and vascular structure, and describes
tissue water molecular diffusion alone. Compared with ADC value, its parameter
D value can more accurately reflect the molecular movement and diffusion of
tumor tissue. The perfusion fraction (f value) representing the volume
percentage of water flowing in the capillaries [3]. Ovarian malignant tumors
with positive peritoneal metastasis proliferate vigorously and may be
accompanied by more new capillaries, but the structure of new capillaries is
immature and may not have effective perfusion function, so the f value is
smaller than that of ovarian cancer with negative peritoneal metastasis. The
standADC, slowADC and f values of IVIM can be used to differentiate peritoneal
metastasis of ovarian cancer, help to predict peritoneal metastasis before
treatment, and provide reference for clinical staging.Acknowledgements
no acknowledgementsReferences
1. National Cancer Institute:
Surveillance E. End Results Program . Cancer Stat Facts: Ovarian Cancer.
Bethesda (MD): SEER Cancer Statistics: Reports on Cancer; (2020)
2. Marrelli D, Petrioli R,
Cassetti D, D'Ignazio A, Marsili S, Mazzei MA, Lazzi S, Roviello F. A novel
treatment protocol with 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by
cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in
stage III primary ovarian cancer. Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;37:101523.
3.Dolciami M, Capuani S, Celli V, Maiuro A,
Pernazza A, Palaia I, Di Donato V, Santangelo G, Rizzo SMR, Ricci P, Della
Rocca C, Catalano C, Manganaro L. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR
Quantification in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC): Preliminary Study on
Assessment of Tumor Aggressiveness and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. J
Pers Med. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):638.