Michael Childers1, Dorab Sethna1, and Shiloh Sison2
1Abbott, Sylmar, CA, United States, 2Abbott, Sunnyvale, CA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Safety, Safety, Implants
Simulations were performed to assess potential gradient
induced vibration of leadless pacemakers. Results of the evaluation showed leadless
pacemakers sized objects, made from commonly used conductive materials, generated
very small vibrations (all less than 0.3mm in displacement) when exposed to conservative
gradient induced vibration safety test conditions per ISO/TS 10974. These
calculated displacements are negligible in comparison to the interacting displacements
between a typical leadless pacemaker and cardiac tissue through each cardiac
cycle. As such, the risk of leadless pacemaker gradient induced vibration tissue
damage is minimal and assessments for this hazard per ISO/TS 10974 may not be
necessary.
Introduction
For the assessment of MR
conditional safety there are many hazards to consider. Gradient induced vibration
is one hazard identified in ISO/TS 10974.
The pulsed magnetic field (dB/dt)
produced by the imaging gradients of an MRI system can induce eddy currents on
the conductive surfaces of an of Active Implantable Medical Device (AIMD). These
eddy currents produce a time varying magnetic moment that interacts with the
static magnetic field (B0) causing vibration of the
conductive surfaces and, subsequently, the device. The time-varying torques
generated by the dB/dt field are proportional to the size of the
conductive surface1, where larger objects of the same material will generate
stronger vibrations and smaller objects will have less vibration. As such,
gradient induced vibration is generally not expected to pose a tissue damage
hazard for small passive medical devices2.
As leadless pacemakers are
relatively small AIMDs, we explore in this abstract the potential
gradient induced vibration for this type of device by modeling leadless
pacemaker sized objects made from commonly used conductive
materials. The results from this
modeling are then analyzed to see if the induced vibration is clinically
significant. Methods
To assess potential
gradient induced vibration of leadless pacemakers, simulations were
performed using COMSOL Multiphysics software (v6.0). These simulations were conducted on leadless
pacemaker sized objects (solid cylinders with length = 38mm and diameter = 6.65mm)
constructed from materials commonly used in AIMD batteries (Titanium, Stainless
Steel, Aluminum, Nickel, Lithium, CFx, SVO). Battery materials were selected as the battery
of a leadless pacemaker makes up the majority of the large conductive surfaces
for this device type and is therefore the primary source of MRI induced
vibration.
The simulations were set up to emulate
exposure to the combined gradient and static magnetic
fields of a 3T clinical scanner with a maximum gradient slew rate of 200T/m/s
per axis. The worst-case pulse sequence waveform characteristics and dB/dt magnitude exposure
conditions defined in the MRI induced vibration safety test per ISO/TS 10974
were used. Two trapezoidal gradient waveforms, 370Hz and 1250Hz, were
simulated (see Figure 1) with a gradient magnetic field strength of 89.8T/s
peak. The gradient magnetic field
strength was determined using an implant radius of 20cm which is associated
with the compliance volume of MR scanners3. This is considered conservative as the actual
implant radius for leadless pacemakers, which reside inside the heart of a
patient, will be considerably smaller than this. The gradient waveform frequencies selected
span the typical driving frequencies at which 3T MRI scanners are driven at maximum slew rate1.
Per ISO/TS 10974 the time-varying forces and torques
exerted on a conductive object are proportional to the cross product of the
transient dB/dt-induced magnetic moment and the B0 field. These forces and torques are therefore
maximized when the AIMD conductive planes are oriented parallel to the B0 field vector and
perpendicular to the strongest dB/dt
vector. As such, each simulated test object was oriented with its
largest conductive plane parallel to the z-axis (B0 field) of the scanner
and orthogonal to the y-axis (dB/dt field) of the
scanner as shown in
Figure 2. The simulations were set up in space with no additional
damping forces applied so that the theoretical worst-case displacements from
the induced torques could be observed.Results
Simulations of gradient induced
vibration were conducted for commonly used AIMD materials as described above. The simulation results are shown in Figure 3
and Figure 4. As can be seen in these figures, the maximum displacement
produced by the switched magnetic field for the materials modeled is small
(<0.3mm), with Lithium, Aluminum, and Nickel producing the largest
displacements.
Although the dB/dt induced
torque generated by the two different waveforms simulated were the same (shown
in Figure 5 for Titanium), the 370Hz trapezoidal waveform resulted in ~3x
larger displacements than the 1250Hz waveform. This was due to the 370Hz
waveform having a longer dwell time between opposing torques allowing for more unrestricted
movement. This additional displacement
from the 370Hz waveform, however, is likely to be much smaller in-vivo as there
are additional structures which will dampen and resist movement during the
dwell times.Discussion/Conclusions
As seen in the results section
above, the modeling of leadless pacemaker sized objects resulted in small vibrations
with displacements all less than 0.3mm. These simulated objects serve as conservative
surrogates for leadless pacemakers as the entire simulated object is
constructed from the worst-case material, whereas leadless pacemakers are
constructed from a composite of materials which will not all contribute to vibration
and will act to dampen the system. Furthermore, the simulations were set up
with conservative worst-case exposure conditions and did not include any surrounding
structures like cardiac tissue or blood which would further dampen the system. The
calculated displacements are negligible in comparison to the interacting displacements
between a typical leadless pacemaker and cardiac tissue through each cardiac
cycle where the right ventricular apex-to-base dimensional differences at
end-systole and end-diastole are estimated at 1.26-1.52cm4. As such, the risk of leadless pacemaker
gradient induced vibration tissue damage is minimal and assessments for this
hazard per ISO/TS 10974 may not be necessary.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
ISO/TS
10974, 2018, "Assessment of the safety of magnetic resonance imaging for
patients with an active implantable medical device" ISO, Geneva,
Switzerland, www.astm.org.
2.
Fda.gov,
2021, “Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic
Resonance (MR) Environment, Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug
Administration Staff” [online] Available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/testing-and-labeling-medical-devices-safety-magnetic-resonance-mr-environment
3.
IEC
6061-2-33, 2022, “Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-33: Particular
requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of magnetic
resonance equipment for medical diagnosis” IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, https://iec.ch.
4.
Karatasakis G, Karagounis L, Kalyvas P, et. al.
Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographically Estimated Right Ventricular
Shortening in Advanced Heart Failure. American Journal of Cardiology 1998; 82:
329-334