Jiahui Zheng1, Weiqiang Dou2, Xiangxiang Wu1, and Haifeng Shi1
1Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, changzhou, China, 2GE Healthcare, MR Research China, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Brain Connectivity, Brain, DKI FC
The goal of this study was to investigate
the relationships of altered brain micro-structure and function, and cognitive
function for ESRD patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Specifically,
diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), the resting-state functional connectivity
(FC) algorithm, and the least squares support vector regression machine
(LSSVRM) were utilized to conduct our study. Brain micro-structural and
functional changes were found in ESRD patients, which may account for the onset
of cognitive impairment in affected patients. These quantitative parameters
combined with our optimized prediction model may be helpful to establish
reliable imaging markers to detect and monitor cognitive impairment associated
with ESRD.
Introduction
Cognitive impairment (CI) is extremely
prominent in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, and involves
deterioration in overall cognition, executive function, and attention1,2.
However, its underlying pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Recently, tentative
quantitative analyses on cerebral impairment have been performed on ESRD
patients using diverse MRI techniques.
Previous imaging studies in ESRD patients
have been based solely on a single modality, which provided limited benefit in
establishing early clinical diagnosis and treatment. In this current study, we
aimed to apply diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) to detect brain microstructure
alterations, and explored the usage of resting-state functional connectivity (FC)
algorithm based on seed regions, which showed significantly altered values of DKI
derived parameters. Finally, the optimized the least squares support vector
regression machine (LSSVRM) combined with these quantitative imaging were used
to predict cognitive function in ESRD patients.Materials and Methods
Subjects: Fifty ESRD patients who received
maintenance hemodialysis treatment in the hemodialysis center from February
2020 to June 2021 were recruited as the patient group. 36 healthy subjects without
known renal disease and other systemic disorders were enrolled as healthy
controls. Both groups were matched based on age, gender, and education years.
MRI acquisition: All MRI experiments were
performed on a 3.0T MRI (Discovery MR750, General Electric Healthcare, USA)
equipped with a standard 32-channel head and a spine combined coil.
High-resolution anatomic T1-weighted images were acquired with
three-dimensional brain volume imaging (3D-BRAVO) sequence (152 slices; slice
thickness = 1.2 mm (no gap); TR = 8.2 ms; TE = 3.2 ms; FA = 12°; matrix = 256×256;
FOV = 240 mm×240 mm). rs-fMRI data were acquired
with the gradient-recalled echo-planar imaging (GRE-EPI) sequence (33 slices;
240 time-points; slice thickness = 4 mm; TR= 2000 ms; TE=40 ms; FA = 90°;
matrix = 64×64; FOV = 240 mm×240
mm). DKI data were acquired with a single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI)
sequence (30 directions; 3 b values: 0, 1000, 2000 s/mm2, NEX = 2,
slice thickness = 3.6 mm (no gap); TR=6500 ms; TE = 95.8 ms; matrix = 128×128;
FOV= 240 mm×240 mm).
Image analysis: The DKI parameter metrics,
including mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (AK), radial kurtosis (RK),
kurtosis anisotropy (KA), were calculated using Diffusion Kurtosis Estimator
(DKE) software. Based on the Resting-state fMRI data analysis Toolkit
(RESTplus_V1.2), the functional connectivity calculations were performed with
selected seed regions, which showed significantly altered DKI parameters.
Data analysis: The demographic, clinical
data and neuropsychological test scores were analyzed using SPSS (SPSS version
23.0). The chi-squared test and two-sample independent Student’s t test
compared the gender-based differences and quantitative data between patient and
control groups, respectively. Two-sample t-test was performed in SPM8 to detect
differences of DKI parameters and FC values between the two groups with p <
0.01 (DKI was corrected by family-wise error criterion [FWE]; FC was corrected
by cluster level FWE). Pearson correlation analysis was performed using GRETNA
software to explore the relationship among DKI parameters, FC values, and MoCA
scores with p < 0.05 and corrected by false discovery rate criterion (FDR).
Finally, LSSVRM was used to perform regression predictions of MoCA scores in
ESRD patients, and the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) was applied to
improve prediction accuracy.Results
In ESRD patients, DKI parameters changed
significantly in 12 brain regions. Among these regions, nine brain regions had
decreased MK and AK values, and three brain regions had increased RK values.
However, there were no significant differences observed in KA between the two
groups. FC values were significantly altered in nine brain regions, with
decreased FC observed in five brain regions and increased FC observed in four
brain regions (Tables 1, 2, and Fig. 1). Pearson correlation analysis revealed
that altered FC values correlated with changed DKI values. In addition, FC
values in three brain regions involved in the temporal and frontal lobes
positively correlated with MoCA scores, while DKI values in two other brain
regions involved in the lingual gyrus positively correlated with MoCA scores
(Fig. 2). The prediction models were capable of predicting cognitive function
with great accuracy in ESRD patients. Based on FC values, the mean square error
(MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute
percentage error (MAPE), and R-squared (R2) values between the
actual scores and predicted scores were 0.72, 0.85, 0.75, 3.57%, and 0.55,
respectively. Based on DKI values, the MSE, RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and R2
values between the actual scores and predicted scores were 0.57, 0.75, 0.64,
3.10%, and 0.59, respectively (Fig. 3).Discussion and Conclusions
Our study demonstrated that widespread
brain microstructural and functional alterations in ESRD patients undergoing
maintenance hemodialysis do not occur independently. Most regions with
disrupted structural and functional integrity were mainly involved in default
model network, frontoparietal network and limbic system regions, and were
associated with multi-dimensional CI. More importantly, prediction models based
on these multimodal findings were able to predict cognitive function in our
cohort of ESRD patients. In conclusion, this
study demonstrated the feasibility of predicting disease progression and
compensation in ESRD patients based on brain microstructure and function
alterations. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Jafar TH, Nitsch D, et al.
Chronic kidney disease. Lancet 2021; 398:786–802.
2. van Zwieten A, Wong G, Ruospo M, et al.
Prevalence and patterns of cognitive impairment in adult hemodialysis patients:
the COGNITIVE-HD study. Nephrol Dial Transpl 2018; 33:1197–1206.