Keywords: Multiple Sclerosis, White Matter, normal appearing white matter, neurodegeneration, cognitive impairment
In 99 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 25 healthy controls we quantified cerebral free water fraction (FWF) and investigated its relationship with lesion burden and information processing speed, measured with Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). FWF was obtained from the mcDESPOT method, fitting a three-compartment relaxation model to spoiled-gradient-echo and balanced-SSFP signals with varying flip angles. MS patients showed higher FWF than controls, in the lesioned tissue and in normal appearing white matter (NAWM). In NAWM and perilesional tissue, FWF correlated with lesion load. FWF spatial heterogeneity increased with worsening SDMT performance in regions involved in MS-related cognitive impairment.
The study was funded by the MS Society UK.
1. Saade C, Bou-Fakhredin R, Yousem DM, Asmar K, Naffaa L, El-Merhi F. Gadolinium and Multiple Sclerosis: Vessels, Barriers of the Brain, and Glymphatics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(12):2168-2176. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5773
2. Sahraian MA, Radue EW, Haller S, Kappos L. Black holes in multiple sclerosis: definition, evolution, and clinical correlations. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2010;122(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01221.x
3. Sumowski JF, Benedict R, Enzinger C, Filippi M, Geurts JJ, Hamalainen P, Hulst H, Inglese M, Leavitt VM, Rocca MA, Rosti-Otajarvi EM. Cognition in multiple sclerosis: State of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology. 2018 Feb 6;90(6):278-88. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004977
4. Deoni SCL, Matthews L, Kolind SH. One component? Two components? Three? The effect of including a nonexchanging “free” water component in multicomponent driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1 and T2. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70(1):147-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24429
5. Lipp I, Jones DK, Bells S, et al. Comparing MRI metrics to quantify white matter microstructural damage in multiple sclerosis. Human Brain Mapping. 2019;40(10):2917-2932. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24568
6. Deoni SCL. High-resolution T1 mapping of the brain at 3T with driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1 with high-speed incorporation of RF field inhomogeneities (DESPOT1-HIFI). Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2007;26(4):1106-1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21130
7. Deoni SCL, Ward HA, Peters TM, Rutt BK. Rapid T2 estimation with phase-cycled variable nutation steady-state free precession. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2004;52(2):435-439. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20159
8. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. Fsl. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015
9. Mori S, Wakana S, Van Zijl PC, Nagae-Poetscher LM. MRI atlas of human white matter. Elsevier; 2005 May 11.
10. Zhang X, Zhang F, Huang D, Wu L, Ma L, Liu H, Zhao Y, Yu S, Shi J. Contribution of gray and white matter abnormalities to cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. International journal of molecular sciences. 2016 Dec 27;18(1):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18010046Fig. 1. Sketch of the mcDESPOT method. DESPOT1 and DESPOT2 methods are combined with a multi-component water relaxation model (fast, slow and very slow relaxing components represent myelin, intra-extra axonal and free water, respectively). T1 and T2 quantitative maps are derived by fitting spoiled-gradient echo (SPGR) and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) signal intensities to varying flip angles (α1…αn). DESPOT1 uses inversion-recovery SPGR (IR-SPGR) to correct for B1 inhomogeneities6; DESPOT2 mitigates the effect of B0 inhomogeneity with RF-phase cycling7.
Fig. 2. Violin plots of free water fraction (FWF) in brain tissues. FWF distribution in normal (healthy control, HC) and pathological (multiple sclerosis, MS) brain tissues. From left to right: white matter, WM; normal appearing WM, NAWM; perilesional tissue, indicating an area of 5 mm around T2-hyperintense lesions; T2-hyperintense lesions, T2L; T1-hypointense lesions, T1L; gray matter, GM. Black horizontal bars indicate significant differences between the two subject groups, while gray bars indicate significant paired tests (within the patient group). *** p<0.001.
Fig. 3. Scatter plots of brain parenchyma free water fraction (FWF) and lesion characteristics. Mean FWF in gray matter (GM, A-D), normal appearing white matter (NAWM, B-E), perilesional tissue (C-F), T1-hypointense and T2-hyperintense MS lesions (G-I) is plotted against T1 and T2 lesion volumes, and their ratio for the cohort of relapsing-remitting MS patients. Spearman’s correlation coefficient ρ is indicated, together with the significance level. The regression line and confidence intervals are also reported, respectively in black and gray.
Fig. 4. Scatter plots of brain parenchyma free water fraction (FWF) and symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) scores. Mean FWF in gray matter (GM, A), normal appearing white matter (NAWM, B), perilesional tissue (C) and T2-hyperintense MS lesions (D) is plotted against the SDMT score for the cohort of relapsing-remitting MS patients. Spearman (ρ) and Pearson (r) correlation coefficients are indicated, together with the significance level, p. The regression line and confidence intervals are also reported, respectively in black and gray.
Fig. 5. Relation between free water fraction (FWF) and symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) score in MS patients. Pearson’s correlation coefficient r (top rows) between regional median FWF (A) or regional FWF variance (B) and SDMT score is illustrated in white matter regions, with the respective p-values (bottom rows). Only regions where the correlation is significant after false discovery rate correction are shown in colors, overlayed on T2-weighted anatomical maps. Sagittal and coronal views are shown for r-maps for the sake of clarity.