Yuto Uchida1, Kengo Onda1, Jill Chotiyanonta1, Zhipeng Hou1, Juan Troncoso2, Susumu Mori1, and Kenichi Oishi1
1Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Alzheimer's Disease, Microstructure
Conventional
neuroimaging biomarkers for the neurodegeneration of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
are not sensitive enough to detect neurodegenerative alterations in preclinical
AD individuals. We aimed to
examine microstructural neurodegeneration of the entorhinal-hippocampus pathway
during the pathological process of AD. Our
ex vivo comparative study of
11.7T MRI and histology successfully visualized microstructural
neurodegeneration of the entorhinal-hippocampus pathway in preclinical AD brain
tissues. In a future study, we aim to translate the findings from
ex vivo
11.7T MRI and histology into
in vivo MRI clinical research for preclinical AD individuals.
INTRODUCTION
Neurons in layer
II of the entorhinal cortex cluster to form neuronal-rich islands1, from which projection fibers converge
to form the angular bundle that reaches the subiculum and connects to the
hippocampus as the perforant pathway2 (entorhinal-hippocampus pathway or EHP,
Figure 1A). In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), memory loss becomes irreversible due
to neurodegeneration of the EHP3. However,
whether such microstructural neurodegeneration is seen in the preclinical stage
of AD remains to be elucidated. In this study, we aim to investigate how
microstructural neurodegeneration of the EHP progresses during the pathological
process of the AD continuum. We hypothesized that cyto- and myeloarchitectonic
features of the EHP would be altered in preclinical AD.MATERIALS AND METHODS
Brain
specimen and histological preparation
De-identified postmortem
brain specimens of the left cerebral hemisphere from a cognitively unimpaired
individual without AD pathological changes (non-AD), a cognitively unimpaired
individual with AD pathological changes (preclinical AD), and a demented
individual with AD pathological changes (AD dementia) were provided by the
Brain Resource Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. The brain specimens
were fixed in 10% formaldehyde for more than two weeks, then sectioned into 10
mm thick coronal slabs. Following MRI scans, the brain tissues were embedded in
paraffin blocks, cut into 10 µm thick sections at 200 μm intervals, and stained
using Luxol fast blue with hematoxylin and eosin (LFB&HE) and amyloid- and tau-immunostaining for
histological verification.
Image
acquisition
Diffusion MRI was
acquired using 11.7T NMR spectrometer (Bruker Biospin, Billerica, MA, USA).
A single-channel 30 mm Bruker
volume coil was used for both radio frequency transmission and reception. Diffusion-weighted
gradient and spin echo sequence with navigator phase correction was applied to
scan the ex vivo brain tissues4. The scan parameters were: echo time =
24, 34, 44, and 55 ms; repetition time = 0.7 s; two signal averages; two b0
images; and ten diffusion directions with a b-value of 2300 s/mm2.
The field of view was 40 × 30 × 16 mm3 and the zero-filled matrix
size was 320 × 240 × 128, resulting in the final resolution of 125 μm
isotropic. The total scan time was 40 hours per scan.
Image processing
and analysis
DtiStudio
software5 was used for the tensor calculation and creation of diffusion tensor images. Diffusion-weighted image (DWI) was
generated by averaging diffusion MRI along isotropically-distributed diffusion
directions. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the entorhinal laminae were measured in each brain tissue. The EHP was constructed by deterministic tractography6
as a tract connecting the entorhinal layer II and the dentate gyrus. An FA
threshold of 0.1, an angle threshold of 60 degrees, and a minimum length of
five pixels were applied.
Statistics
This study
included the ex vivo MRI and histological data from three de-identified
postmortem individuals. Therefore, we did not perform inferential statistics
but descriptive statistics and graphical displays.RESULTS
Anatomical
identification
The entorhinal
layer II islands and perforant pathway showed blue chromophilic contrasts in LFB&HE, which were clearly
visible in non-AD (Figure 1B), whereas they are not visible in AD dementia (Figure
1C). These cyto- and myeloarchitectonic features could be observed on ex
vivo 11.7T MRI. In non-AD, DWI displays dark striate intensities for fibers
of the perforant pathway and bright patchy intensities for the entorhinal layer
II islands (Figure 1D). The FA map displays bright striates for fibers of the
perforant pathway and a bright lamina in the entorhinal layer II (Figure 1E).
In contrast, ex vivo images in AD dementia reveal the demise of the
entorhinal layer II islands and perforant path fibers (Figure 1F).
Quantitative
analysis
At 125 μm
isotropic resolution, laminar contrasts were seen within the entorhinal cortex.
The RoiEditor software delineated the boundary of the cortical substructures,
extracting FA values in each cortical lamina (Layer I–IV) from the non-AD (Figure
2A), preclinical AD (Figure 2B), and AD dementia (Figure 2C). We found that the
FA value of the entorhinal layer II was the highest among the entorhinal
laminae in non-AD and preclinical AD, whereas the FA values were homogenously
low in AD dementia (Figure 2D). Note that layer IV, which corresponds to the
internal granular layer, is indiscernible in the entorhinal cortex.
Tract
Reconstruction
The perforant
path fibers were clearly visualized in non-AD and preclinical AD (Figure 3A),
but not in AD dementia. The number and average length of fibers became
decreased during the pathological process of the AD continuum (non-AD > preclinical
AD > AD dementia).DISCUSSION
Conventional
neuroimaging biomarkers for the neurodegeneration of AD are not sensitive
enough to detect neurodegenerative alterations during the preclinical stage of
AD7. Given the clinical and pathological significance of the EHP
to the earliest AD pathogenesis2,
8-10, establishing a methodology for quantification of these
microstructures is a priority issue for the development of a novel
neurodegenerative biomarker for preclinical AD. Our results showed that the FA
value of the entorhinal layer II will be a promising measure for a highly
sensitive and focal neurodegenerative biomarker.CONCLUSION
We successfully
visualized microstructural neurodegeneration of the EHP in the AD continuum ex
vivo. In a future
study, we aim to translate the findings from ex vivo 11.7T MRI and
histology into in vivo MRI clinical research.Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Richman Family Precision
Medicine Center of Excellence in Alzheimer's Disease including significant
contributions from the Richman Family Foundation, the Rick Sharp Alzheimer’s
Foundation, the Sharp Family Foundation and others. SM is a founder and KOi is
a consultant for “AnatomyWorks” and “Corporate-M.” This arrangement is being
managed by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its
conflict-of-interest policies. The authors thank the Brain Resource Center for
providing the brain specimens and Mary McAllister for English-language
editing.References
1. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological
stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 1991;82:239-259.
2. Hyman BT,
Van Hoesen GW, Kromer LJ, Damasio AR. Perforant pathway changes and the memory
impairment of Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 1986;20:472-481.
3. Hyman BT,
Van Hoesen GW, Damasio AR, Barnes CL. Alzheimer's disease: cell-specific
pathology isolates the hippocampal formation. Science 1984;225:1168-1170.
4. Aggarwal M,
Mori S, Shimogori T, et al. Three-dimensional diffusion tensor microimaging for
anatomical characterization of the mouse brain. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:249-261.
5. Jiang H,
van Zijl PC, Kim J, et al. DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor
computation and fiber bundle tracking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed
2006;81:106-116.
6. Mori S,
Crain BJ, Chacko VP, van Zijl PC. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal
projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol
1999;45:265-269.
7. Jack CR,
Jr., Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a
biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement
2018;14:535-562.
8. Gómez-Isla
T, Price JL, McKeel DW, Jr., et al. Profound loss of layer II entorhinal cortex
neurons occurs in very mild Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 1996;16:4491-4500.
9. Price JL,
Ko AI, Wade MJ, et al. Neuron number in the entorhinal cortex and CA1 in
preclinical Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1395-1402.
10. Yassa MA, Muftuler LT, Stark CE.
Ultrahigh-resolution microstructural diffusion tensor imaging reveals perforant
path degradation in aged humans in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2010;107:12687-12691.