Saeed Jerban1,2,3, Amir Masoud Afsahi 1, Sophia Dwek1, Jiyo Athertya1, Bhavsimran Malhi1, Dina Moazamian1, Yajun Ma1,2, Sam Sedaghat1, Hyungseok Jang1,2, Gina Woods4, Christine B Chung1,2, Jiang Du1,2, and Eric Y Chang1,2
1Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, San Diego, CA, United States, 2Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, San Diego, CA, United States, 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, San Diego, CA, United States, 4Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Tendon/Ligament, Tendon/Ligament
Tendon and bone comprise a special
interacting unit. Bone loss in osteoporosis (OPo) may associate with a
reduction in tendon quality that needs to be investigated. We investigated the tendon quality differences
between OPo patients, osteopenia (OPe) patients, and healthy volunteers with
normal bone (Normal) using the Frac-LongT2
index, a rapid measure performed by
dual-echo ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI. The estimated Frac-LongT2 in the anterior and posterior
tibialis tendon (ATT and PTT) were significantly higher in the OPo group
compared with the Normal group. This study highlights the potential of this
rapid UTE-based technique for in vivo tendon assessment.
INTRODUCTION
Tendon
and bone are complementary tissues that comprise a special interacting unit
that are essential for locomotion and individual autonomy (1). The internal mechanical forces applied to these
tissues are generated by muscle contractions which affect the strength and
microarchitecture of both bone (1,2) and tendon (3). For example, Chen et al., have shown that the
tendon’s mechanical strength is significantly correlated with the bone mineral
density in an osteoporotic rabbit model (4). Bone
loss in osteoporosis (OPo) and in its earlier stage disease, osteopenia (OPe),
may be coupled with a reduction in tendon quality. Quantitative and noninvasive
imaging evaluation can help to enhance our understanding of the OPo-related
changes in tendons and eventually help to improve the diagnosis and treatment
OPo. Tendons
possess very short T2 relaxation times due to a high concentration of an
organized collagenous matrix (5) that results in a low
signal-to-noise ratio when imaged using conventional MR sequences. However, the
ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI technique is capable of detecting considerable
signal from both the short-T2 and long-T2 components in tendons and can provide
quantitative evaluations (6). The long T2 fraction (Frac-LongT2) that can be
calculated by the signal ratio in dual-echo UTE imaging (7) (TE≈0 and 2.2 ms) is an example of a rapid
UTE-based technique which can be performed in less than 5 mins. This study aims
to investigate the differences in Frac-LongT2 of the anterior tibialis tendon
(ATT) and posterior tibialis tendon (PTT), between female OPe, OPo, and Normal
subjects. METHODS
Institutional review board approval and
written informed consent were obtained for all recruited subjects. The lower
legs of 14 OPe (72±6 years) and 31 OPo (73±6 years) female patients, as well as
30 participants with normal bone (Normal, 36±19 years), were imaged on a 3T
clinical scanner (MR750, GE) using an eight-channel knee coil. The imaging slab
was centered in the middle of the tibia. A dual-echo 3D Cones UTE sequence
(TR=100 ms, TE=0.032 and 2.2 ms, FA=10°)
was performed to estimate the long T2 signal fraction (Frac-LongT2) of tendons
as the ratio between the signal at the second echo time (TE=2.2 ms) to the UTE
signal. Field-of-view, matrix dimension, nominal voxel size, number of slices,
slice thickness, and scan time were 14cm, 160×160×0.87mm, 24, 5mm, and 5
minutes, respectively. The average Frac-LongT2 was calculated for ATT and PTT.
The Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks was used to examine the differences in
Frac-LongT2 of the tendons between the groups. RESULTS
UTE (TE=0.032ms) and second echo (TE=2.2
ms) axial images of the lower leg of a healthy subject are presented in Figure
1. While UTE imaging detects a high signal in tendons it lacks a high-contrast
appearance, limiting ROI selection. The second echo image (Fig.1B) was used by
the readers to select ROIs covering ATT and PTT. Figure 2 shows Frac-LongT2 maps generated for
the tendons of three exemplary participants from the Normal, OPe, and OPo
groups. For these examples, Frac-LongT2 was obviously higher for OPe and OPo
patients compared with Normal participants. Figure 3 (Table 1) presents the
estimated average and standard deviation (SD) values of Frac-LongT2 in ATT and
PTT of participants from Normal, OPe, and OPo groups. The percentage
differences and statistical significances of Frac-LongT2 between the Normal,
OPe, and OPo groups are presented in Figure 4 (Table 2). Frac-LongT2 in ATT and
PTT was significantly higher for OPo compared with the Normal group. The
Normal/OPo difference was larger in the ATT than PTT (26.9 and 37.6% in ATT and
PTT, respectively). However, the Frac-T2 differences between Normal vs OPe
groups and OPe vs OPo groups were not significant. Figure 5 depicts the
average, median, SD, and the first and third quartiles Frac-LongT2 for each
studied group using box and whisker plots. Significant differences are
indicated with dashed lines between groups and highlighted with an asterisk.DISCUSSION
This
study investigated the differences in Frac-LongT2 in lower leg tendons between
OPo, OPe, and Normal subjects. The rapid UTE-MRI-based technique for
quantitative tendon evaluation can be considered for translational applications
due to its simplicity and time efficiency. Significantly different Frac-LongT2 was found between
the tendons of Normal and OPo groups, demonstrating the potential of the simple
dual-echo UTE technique in tendon quality assessment over a spectrum of bone
diseases. The potential magic-angle sensitivity of this technique may be a confounding
factor that requires future investigationsCONCLUSION
The Frac-LongT2 index, as a rapid
UTE-MRI-based technique, can be considered as a useful tool to detect and
monitor tendon quality changes in individuals affected by bone-related diseases.
Frac-LongT2 was significantly higher in patients with OPo compared with normal
participants.Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge grant support
from the National Institutes of Health (R01AR068987, R01AR062581, R01AR075825,
K01AR080257, R01AR079484, and 5P30AR073761), Veterans Affairs Clinical Science
R&D (I01CX001388 and I01CX000625), and GE Healthcare.References
1. Edwards MH,
Dennison EM, Aihie Sayer A, Fielding R, Cooper C. Osteoporosis and sarcopenia
in older age. Bone 2015;80:126–130 doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.016.
2. Cederholm T,
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Maggi S. Sarcopenia and fragility fractures. Eur J Phys
Rehabil Med 2013;49:111–117.
3. Boesen AP,
Dideriksen K, Couppé C, et al. Effect of growth hormone on aging connective
tissue in muscle and tendon: Gene expression, morphology, and function
following immobilization and rehabilitation. J Appl Physiol 2014;116:192–203
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01077.2013.
4. Chen X,
Giambini H, Ben-Abraham E, An KN, Nassr A, Zhao C. Effect of bone mineral
density on rotator cuff tear: An osteoporotic rabbit model. PLoS ONE
2015;10:1–12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139384.
5. Chang EY, Du
J, Chung CB. UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system. Journal of Magnetic
Resonance Imaging 2015;41:870–883 doi: 10.1002/jmri.24713.
6. Afsahi AM, Ma
Y, Jang H, et al. Ultrashort Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques:
Met and Unmet Needs in Musculoskeletal Imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Imaging 2022;55:1597–1612 doi: 10.1002/jmri.28032.
7. Rajapakse CS,
Bashoor-Zadeh M, Li C, Sun W, Wright AC, Wehrli FW. Volumetric Cortical Bone
Porosity Assessment with MR Imaging: Validation and Clinical Feasibility.
Radiology 2015;276:526–35 doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141850.