Yakun Zhang1, Shichun Chen1, Zongpai Zhang1, Wenna Duan1, George Weinschenk1, Li Zhao2, Brandon Gibb3, Adam Anderson4, Wenming Luh5, and Weiying Dai1
1Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, United States, 2College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 3Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, United States, 4Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States, 5Cornell MRI Facility, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Brain Connectivity, Arterial spin labelling
We evaluated the relationship between
attention levels and brain global efficiencies. This relationship was compared
with brain global efficiencies measured with dynamic ASL (dASL) and with
multi-echo (ME) BOLD fMRI. We found significantly greater correlation between
attention levels (reflected by P3 properties when performing an attention task)
and brain global efficiencies based on rsFC using dASL than those using ME BOLD
fMRI, indicating that dASL can offer more accurate global neural signal
fluctuations.
Introduction
Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD)
functional MRI (fMRI) signals have been shown to exhibit widespread, positive
correlation with neural signals measured with local field potentials (LFP) at a
single cortical site, indicating the global component of BOLD signal
fluctuations is tightly coupled with underlying neural activity (1). We have shown that signal fluctuations
from dynamic arterial spin labeling (dASL) are globally correlated and their
power spectra are within the range of brain neural networks (2). Recently, brain global efficiencies
and brain attention levels, based on resting-state functional connectivity and
event-related potentials (ERPs) using EEG, were demonstrated to be closely
related (3,4). To understand neural mechanism in neuropsychiatric
disorders involving attentional impairments (e.g., ADHD), it is crucial to find
a sensitive resting-state trait measure to index a person’s attention level.
Here, we compared the performance of brain global efficiencies using dASL and multi-echo
(ME) BOLD (5,6), in terms of their correlations with brain attention
levels.Methods
We used the resting-state dASL,
resting-state ME BOLD and task EEG data acquired at two time points from ten
healthy college students (19.20 ± 0.28 years old) in a meditation study
retrospectively.
Task EEG data were collected outside the
scanner using a 128-channel EEG net (EGI Inc.). A visual oddball paradigm was
performed to measure P3 with two types of visual stimuli, 20% of ‘X’ (target) and
80% of ‘O’ (standard). Pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) was used
to acquire resting-state dASL (7) with fifty 3D ASL volumes in 17
minutes. Resting-state ME BOLD images were acquired with 200 volumes in 10
minutes on a 3 T GE MR750 scanner.
For the task EEG data, P3 amplitude was
defined as the largest amplitude within [300ms, 650ms] from the stimulus start at
the Pz electrode. P3 onset latency was defined as the earliest time points at
which an ERP amplitude exceeds half of the P3 amplitude.
Raw ME BOLD images were processed with multi-echo
ICA pipeline (5) to remove non-BOLD noises and we referred to those
processed images as ME BOLD images. We also generated single-echo (SE) BOLD
images by averaging ME BOLD images with TE-dependent weights and regressing out
the white matter and CSF signal fluctuations and motion effects. No denoising
was performed for dASL images. dASL, ME BOLD and SE BOLD images were normalized
to the standard MNI space using T1-weighted MPRAGE images as intermediate. Regional
time series was calculated as mean signal series over each of the 90 regions in
the AAL atlas. The coherence values between any two regions was calculated
because coherence in the frequency domain was shown to be more sensitive than
the correlation in the time domain (8). A 90x90 coherence matrix was constructed for each
subject. Four global efficiencies (9) were calculated from the coherence
matrix, including mean functional connectivity (MFC), cluster coefficient (CC),
global efficiency (Ge) and characteristic path length (CPL). The four global efficiencies, which were
derived from either method were correlated with P3 amplitude and P3 onset
latency. To calculate correlations properly, Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to
test for normality of each variable. If either of two variables was rejected
from the Shapiro-Wilk normality tests, the Spearman correlation was performed
instead of Pearson correlation.Results
P3 amplitude was
significantly correlated with all four global efficiencies derived from dASL
(positive correlation with MFC, CC and Ge, and negative correlation with CPL),
but not correlated with the four global efficiencies derived from ME BOLD or SE
BOLD. Using Steiger’s z tests, the correlation coefficients between P3
amplitude and the four global efficiencies using dASL was significantly higher (in
absolute values) than those using ME BOLD and those using SE BOLD.
P3
onset latencies were significantly correlated with all four global efficiencies
derived from dASL (negative correlation with MFC, CC and Ge, and positive
correlation with CPL) but not correlated with those derived from ME BOLD or SE
BOLD. Using Steiger’s z tests, the correlation coefficients between P3 onset
latency and the four global efficiencies using dASL was significantly higher (in
absolute values) than those using ME BOLD, but was not different from those
using SE BOLD. All the correlations using ASL remained significant after
family-wise error (FWE) correction. All the correlation coefficients using
dASL, ME BOLD, SE BOLD and Steiger’s z tests results are listed in Table
1. Discussion
We observed significantly larger
correlation between attention levels (reflected by P3 properties when
performing an attention task) and brain global efficiencies using dASL than those
using ME BOLD and SE BOLD, indicating that dASL can offer more accurate global
neural signal fluctuations. The higher sensitivity of dASL may be emerged from dASL
signals with minimal contaminations of physiological noises and subject motion.
We postulate that global neural fluctuations were removed largely in the BOLD denoising
steps because they are mixed with physiological noises. The brain global
efficiencies using dASL may serve as a promising biomarker to characterize
brain attention.Conclusion
We demonstrated
significant higher correlation of attention levels and brain global
efficiencies using dASL than those using ME BOLD and SE BOLD, indicating that
dASL can offer more accurate global neural signal fluctuations.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Scholvinck ML, Maier A, Ye FQ, Duyn
JH, Leopold DA. Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. Proc Natl
Acad Sci 2010;107(22):10238-10243.
2. Zhao
L, Alsop DC, Detre JA, Dai W. Global Fluctuations of Cerebral Blood Flow Indicate
a Global Brain Network Independent of Systemic Factors. J Cereb Blood Flow
Metab 2019;39(2):302-312.
3. Li
F, Liu T, Wang F,et al. Relationships between the resting-state network and the
P3: Evidence from a scalp EEG study. Sci Rep 2015;5:15129.
4. Li
F, Tao Q, Peng W,et al. Inter-subject P300 variability relates to the
efficiency of brain networks reconfigured from resting- to task-state: Evidence
from a simultaneous event-related EEG-fMRI study. Neuroimage 2020;205:116285.
5. Kundu
P, Brenowitz ND, Voon V,et al. Integrated strategy for improving functional
connectivity mapping using multiecho fMRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2013;110(40):16187-16192.
6. Poser
BA, Versluis MJ, Hoogduin JM, Norris DG. BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement
and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: parallel-acquired
inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;55(6):1227-1235.
7. Dai
W, Varma G, Scheidegger R, Alsop DC. Quantifying fluctuations of resting state
networks using arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
2016;36(3):463-473.
8. Mahadevan
AS, Tooley UA, Bertolero MA, Mackey AP, Bassett DS. Evaluating the sensitivity
of functional connectivity measures to motion artifact in resting-state fMRI
data. Neuroimage 2021;241:118408.
9. Rubinov
M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and
interpretations. Neuroimage 2010;52(3):1059-1069.