Qianqian Feng1, Weiyin Vivian Liu2, Ling Sang1, Kejun Wang1, Xingyao Yu1, Wen Chen1, and Lin Xu1
1Department of Radiology,Taihe hospital, Hubei, China, 2GE Healthcare, MR Research, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Breast, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques
Our study showed synthetic
DW images (syDWIs) with high b-value provided better lesion conspicuity, image
quality and contrast to noise (CNR), reduce scan time of DWI acquisitions
especially at very high b-value, and improved lesion visualization particularly
in dense breast. Moreover, derived ADC values showed good consistency between scanned
and synthetic DWIs. Therefore, syDWIs with b value of 800 s/mm
2 have
great potential in elevation of diagnosis confidence and efficacy on tumors and
high repeatability of ADC values is helpful in replacement of scanned high-b-value
DWIs in clinics despite existed intra-modality, but not inter-modality, difference
of manual ROI measures.
Introduction
Clinically-used diffusion-weighted imaging with
b-value 800 s/mm2 is used to grade tumors without the use of
contrast agents [1] and
showed the same sensitivity to breast lesions as contrast-enhanced MRI. Tissues
with high limited diffusion,
such as most malignant breast tumors, appear relatively visible and bright on
high b-value DWIs. However, a higher b-value leads to an increase in imaging
artifacts and noise as well as a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and a
prolonged scan time [2]. Image
quality directly affects the reliability and repeatability of ADC values due to
edge delineation of ROIs[3,4]. Synthetic
DW images (syDWIs) with high b-value provide better lesion conspicuity, image
quality and tumor-to-tissue contrast (SIR), reduce scan time of DWI acquisitions
especially at very high b-value, and improve lesion visualization particularly
in dense breast [2,5,6]. Better
fat suppression and less artifact can be achieved on 1.5T compared to 3T, and
thus our study was to explore the feasibility of syDWIs
on 1.5T, including the diagnostic quality, discrimination efficiency of tumors
on syDWIs and repeatability of ADC values for setting up a breast cancer
protocol. Methods
23 females with
ultrasound-suspected breast cancer at the average age of(48.52±11.63)years were recruited for totally 32 lesions and
underwent MR examination on 1.5T MR scanner (Voyager,GE
Healthcare,Milwaukee,
U.S.A) using 8-channel breast coils. Single-shot spin echo echo-planar
diffusion weighted imaging was conduct with the following parameters: TR/TE =
4000/50 ms, field of view = 40 cm, slice thickness/gap = 4/0, matrix size = 288
*120, 5 b-values = [0, 50, 100, 400, 800], 12 b-values =
[0,50,100-400.800-2400]. Two radiologists independently subjectively assessed
every lesion at five-point visual grading characteristic (VCG) score. The
same-sized ROI was placed on the largest cross-section tumor DWIs with b values
(800,1000 and1200 s/mm2) to obtain SNR (SIlesion/SDbackground),
CNR (SIlesion - SIlesion/SDobturator internus),
and SIR (signal-intensity-ratio = SIlesion/SDconlateral normal
breast tissue). Three ROIs with size of the whole lesion,
10 mm2 as a part-lesion type and 3 mm2
as a point-type were placed on the largest cross-section tumor,
contralateral normal gland, ipsilateral normal gland 2-centimeter-distal to
lesions in avoidance of cysts, necrosis, and hemorrhage to retrieve ADC values
computed based on scanned and synthetic DWIs with any two b values [0, (800,
1000, 1200) s/mm2]. Illustration of ROI position was shown in Figure
1(a-c). Statistics analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0. Intraclass
correlation coefficient or Cohen’s Kappa was used to check interobserver consistency
of objective and subjective assessment. Paired t or Wilcoxon signed test were
tested for ADC values depending on data normality. P < 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.Results
For subjective and objective evaluation on
image quality, inter-observer and inter-modality consistency of scanned and
synthetic DWIs with three different b-values was respectively moderate to good
(Table 1), and overall subjective and objective assessment for image quality was
higher on synthetic DWIs than scanned DWIs (Figure 1-2). SNR and CNR reduced as
b-value increased (Figure 2). For quantitative assessment of ADC maps, histogram-derived
parameters such as mean and median on lesions showed significant difference
between scanned and synthetic DWIs (p < 0.05) (Table 2-3). Significant
different ADC values were found between 5 b-value scanned and synthetic DWIs,
12 b-value scanned and synthetic DWIs and also 5 b-value synthetic and 12 b-value
synthetic DWIs using different ROI measurements (Table 2-3). There was no
significant difference between ipsilateral and contralateral normal breast
tissues (Table 4). Different ROI measurement derived ADC values on the same
DWIs showed significantly different mean and median (Table 2-3).Discussion
Our main findings
showed better image quality, including subjective and objective assessment, of
high-b-value syDWIs and manually-ROI-derived ADC values varied within the same
DWIs and between scanned and synthetic DWIs. These results strengthen diagnosis
confidence and elevate lesion detection rate. As shown in Figure 1(d-i), more
clear breast structures were demonstrated on syDWIs due to computed with
low-b-value DWI images. For lesions, ADC and computed using scanned and
synthetic DWIs showed moderate to good consistency. SNR and CNR of
synthetic DWIs were higher than scanned ones. On synthetic DWIs, less noise in
normal breast tissue and more homogeneous gland particularly dense breast
lowered missing breast cancer rate [5]. Consistent ADC and values could be used to determine benign or malignant
tumors. In spite of several limitations in our study including small sample
size, no exam for diagnosis performance, synthetic DWIs possess good features
of scanned DWIs such as high signal intensity (SI) in display of tumor and
can-be-used ADC and values. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Baltzer
P, Mann R M, Iima M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a
consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(3):
1436-1450.
[2] Bickel H, Polanec S H, Wengert G, et al.
Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Breast Cancer: Improved Lesion Visibility and Image
Quality Using Synthetic b-Values[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 50(6):
1754-1761.
[3] Newitt D C, Zhang Z, Gibbs J E, et al.
Test-retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measures by breast DWI:
Results from the ACRIN 6698 trial[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 49(6):
1617-1628.
[4] Whisenant J G, Romanoff J, Rahbar H, et al.
Factors Affecting Image Quality and Lesion Evaluability in Breast
Diffusion-weighted MRI: Observations from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Multisite Trial (A6702)[J]. J Breast Imaging, 2021, 3(1): 44-56.
[5] Daimiel Naranjo I, Lo Gullo R, Saccarelli C, et
al. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging with synthetic b-values in
breast tumors: comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced and multiparametric
MRI[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(1): 356-367.
[6] Sartoretti T, Sartoretti E, Wyss M, et al.
Diffusion-weighted MRI of ischemic stroke at 3T: Value of synthetic
b-values[J]. Br J Radiol, 2021, 94(1121): 20200869.