jie hu1,2, yanli yang1, haifeng ran1, jingjing zhang3, cheng he4, heng liu1, and tijiang zhang1
1Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, zunyi, China, 2Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, beijing, China, 3Department of Radiology, Mianyang Hospital of T.C.M, mianyang, China, 4Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Central Hospital,, chongqing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Neuro, Brain
This study were
preliminarily established
an individualized diagnosis model of communication dysfunction in children with
bilateral spastic cerebral palsy based on cortical morphological parameters
extracted from structure magnetic resonance images by using Support Vector
Machines classification algorithm. This may provide a novel idea for the
diagnose of communication disorder in children with BSCP.
Introduction
Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common disabling
disorder in children and the bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (BSCP) subtype is
the most prevalent[1]. The communication
dysfunction are common problems in children with BSCP, which severely affect their
learning ability and their future career progression. The intervention begins
as earlier as possible, communication function of children with BSCP can be
improved[2-4]. Thus, it is essential to identify the children with communication disorder in pediatric BSCP. This study aimed
to seek effective neuroimaging biomarkers for the individual
diagnosis of communication disorder of BSCP children.Methods
The
study finally included 59 subjects (28 children with BSCP and 31 healthy
controls [HCs])(Table 1). The inclusion criteria for the case group were as follows: (1) clinically diagnosed BSCP; (2) age 4-16
years at the time of magnetic resonance images (MRI) scanning; (3) MRI
indicates periventricular white matter lesions(the most common type of injuries
among the BSCP). The exclusion criteria were: (1) any other neurological
disorders and/or history of malignant tumors or head trauma; (2) image
artifacts affecting the image analysis. MRI were acquired on a 3 T scanner
(Signa HDXT; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with an 8-channel head coil.
High resolution structure images were acquired using three-dimensional
T1-weighted imaging(3D-T1WI) sequence with the following parameters:
repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE)=7.8/3.0ms, slice thickness =1mm, field of
view(FOV) =256×256 mm2, matrix =256×256, flip angle =15°. Verbal
comprehension index (VCI) of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 4nd edition
were performed in children with BSCP and healthy controls. Communication Function
Classification System (CFCS) was assessed in children with BSCP.
Based on the FreeSurfer
version 5.3.0 image analysis suite (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu), high resolution
structure images of BSCP and healthy controls groups were processed to obtain cortical
morphological parameters(cortical surface area, cortical volume, and subcortical
structures volume) using the Destrieux Atlas. Then, with these features, Support
Vector Classification (SVC) algorithm was used
to construct a prediction model to predicted whether the children with BSCP have
communication disorder, and the CFCS level of I is defined as communication
function normally, and the CFCS level of II-V is defined as communication disorder.
Feature dimensionality reduction was achieved using two-sample t-test(the BSCP
and control groups were compared). Receiver operating characteristic curve was
used to evaluate model performance. Leave-one-out cross-validation is applied to
test the classification capability of the prediction model constructed by SVC,
and for the assessment of the statistical significance of classification accuracy,
non-parametric permutation tests were adopted, P < 0.05 considered to
be statistically significant difference. Feature contributions from different
gyrus in the model passed a permutation test were quantified by normalized
feature contribution weights which were projected back on a cortical surface
for visualization.
Cortical
morphological parameters were also compared between the two groups using two-sample t-test. Spearman rank
correlation were applied to compute the correlation between significantly different cortical morphological parameters among
two groups and VCI as well as CFCS levels, considering
age and sex as a covariate, and P < 0.05 considered to be statistical
significance, multiple comparisons
were corrected using the Bonferroni method.Results
The
accuracy of using cortical morphological parameters
(cortical surface area, cortical volume, and subcortical structures volume) as
characteristic information to distinguish whether children with BSCP had
combined communication disorder was 78.5%, 71.4%, and 71.4%, respectively. And the
reliability of the constructed model based on cortical surface area passed a
permutation test (P = 0.015; AUC value = 0.694; Sensitivity = 0.600; Specificity
= 0.888) (Table 2) (Figure 1). In this model, the features that contributed
to distinguish communication disorder in children with BSCP were mainly located
in the left middle frontal gyrus(L-MFG), left middle temporal gyrus(L-MTG), right superior frontal gyrus(R-SFG), right frontopolar
transverse gyrus/sulcus, right middle occipital gyrus(R-MOG), right cuneate
gyrus (R-CG), and right occipital pole (R-OP) (Figure 2).
The cortical surface
area of the L-MTG, L-MFG and R-OP were negatively
correlated with CFCS, the correlations (r values)
ranged between -0.389 and -0.452, and the P-values range between 0.020
and 0.049(Figure 3). And the distribution of these brain regions were
consistent with the location of features that contributed to distinguish
communication impairment in children with BSCP.Conclusion
The cortical surface
area could be used to establish an individualized diagnostic model of
communication disorder in children with BSCP, which may provide a new way to diagnose
communication disorder in children with BSCP, and communication disorder in
children with BSCP was associated with the cortical surface area
of the L-MTG, MFG and R-OP cortex.Acknowledgements
NoneReferences
[1]. Patel, D. R.; Neelakantan, M.; Pandher, K.; Merrick, J., Cerebral palsy in children: a clinical overview. Transl Pediatr 2020, 9 (Suppl 1), S125-S135.
[2]. Van Naarden Braun, K.; Doernberg, N.; Schieve, L.; Christensen, D.; Goodman, A.; Yeargin-Allsopp, M., Birth Prevalence of Cerebral Palsy: A Population-Based Study. Pediatrics 2016, 137 (1).
[3]. Kristoffersson, E.; Dahlgren Sandberg, A.; Holck, P., Communication ability and communication methods in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2020, 62 (8), 933-938.
[4]. Pennington, L.; Dave, M.; Rudd, J.; Hidecker, M. J. C.; Caynes, K.; Pearce, M. S., Communication disorders in young children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2020, 62 (10), 1161-1169.