Vadim Malis1, Yoshimori Kassai2, Mitsue Miyazaki1, and Won Bae1,3
1Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States, 2Canon Medical Systems Corp, Otawara, Japan, 3VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Cartilage, Tissue Characterization, T1rho
Three T1rho sequences based using 3D FASE, 3D UTE,
and 3D MAPSS acquisitions were developed and compared by imaging agarose
phantoms and normal human knees. The sequences utilize 4 to 6 spin lock times,
and can be acquired in about 5 min or less. On phantoms, all three sequences
resulted in consistent T1rho values that decreased with increasing agarose
concentration, similar to past reports. T1rho values of cartilage and menisci
were also in line with previously reported values. This work will be useful for evaluating knee
osteoarthritis and other musculoskeletal diseases.
Introduction
While
conventional T1 or T2 MR imaging have been available for some time, the
techniques may be suboptimal for evaluation of biological tissues containing
macromolecules such as articular cartilage. T1rho imaging1-3 has
been proposed as a more sensitive alternative.
T1rho relaxation is achieved with an external spin-lock RF pulse, which
locks the spin magnetization in the transverse plane and slows the relaxation
process. T1rho values of cartilage changes with osteoarthritis,4
making it a promising quantitative technique. Purpose of the study was to compare
three T1rho sequences of 3D fast advanced spin echo (FASE), 3D ultrashort echo
time (UTE), and 3D magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned k-space
spoiled gradient echo snapshots (MAPSS), for musculoskeletal imaging.
Methods
T1rho
Sequences:
We developed the following T1rho sequences using a rotary echo spin lock
preparation pulse followed by 3D FASE (aka 3D single-shot fast spin echo)
(Figure 1A) or 3D radial UTE (Figure 1B) acquisitions. The third sequence was
3D MAPSS (Figure 1C), which is a prototype of QIBA compliant compatible
implementation provided from the manufacturer.
Agarose
Phantoms: The agarose phantoms consisted of 45 ml of
agarose gel placed in 50ml plastic centrifuge tubes. The phantoms had an
agarose concentration (w/w) of the 2%, 3%, and 4%, respectively, as described
previously,5 and were scanned at
room temperature.
After
a number of initial tastings, we settled on both 6 TSL points for both
sequences.
Human
Subjects:
Bilateral knees of 5 asymptomatic volunteers (4 male, 1 female, ages 31 to 66
years old) were included for 3D FASE and 3D UTE imaging, and a subset of 3
volunteers (2 male, 1 female, ages 49 to 66 years) were included for 3D MAPSS
imaging.
MRI: MR imaging was
performed on a 3-Tesla Canon Galan scanner using a 16-channel transmit and
receive knee coil. Phantoms were imaged transversely. Knees were imaged
sagittal covering lateral and medial compartments. Scan parameters were:
3D
FASE T1rho:
repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 1497/10 ms, bandwidth =651 Hz, flip angle
(FA) = 90°, echo numbers=5. Echo train length (ETL) = 162, FOV = 220 × 220 mm,
image matrix = 320 × 320, slice thickness=3 mm, acquisition time = 2 min 12 s.
TSL=1, 16, 31, 46, 61, 76. Spin lock frequency=250 Hz.
3D
UTE T1rho:
TR/TE =3.7 / 0.096 ms, bandwidth = 488 Hz, FA = 5°, ETL = 1, FOV=200x200 mm,
matrix=256x256, slice thickness=2.0 mm, acquisition time = 5 min 32 s. number
of projections = 16,000. TSL=1, 21, 41, 61 ms. Spin lock frequency=250 Hz.
3D
MAPSS (FAST3D) T1rho:
TR/TE =6.0 / 2.8 ms, bandwidth = 391 Hz, FA = 20°, ETL = 1, FOV=230x230 mm,
matrix=192x192, slice thickness=3.0 mm, acquisition time = 2 min 34 s. TSL=0, 10,
40, and 80 ms. Spin lock frequency=250 Hz.
Image
Analysis: For phantoms, circular regions of interest
(ROI) were placed in the center of each agarose phantom to determine average
T1rho values and create color maps (Figure 2, color). For human knees, four
regions of interest (Figure 5, color) of femoral cartilage, tibial cartilage,
anterior meniscus, and posterior meniscus were drawn in lateral and medial
compartments to determine T1rho values by averaging signal intensity of all
voxels within each ROI then fitting (Figure 3) using a nonlinear least square
fitting routine to a simple mono-exponential decay function similar to T2
relaxation. Results and Discussion
Agarose Phantom: Figure 2 shows selected raw images of agarose
phantoms imaged with the 3 T1rho sequence, along with T1rho colormaps. General
trend of decreasing T1rho values with increasing agarose concentration was
observed. Figure 3 shows good curve-fits for the 2% agarose phantom. Figure 4
shows the T1rho values of the phantoms confirming the decreasing trend,
suggesting that the sequences were sensitive to macromolecular concentration. In
particular, 3D MAPSS sequence showed values of 51, 34, and 38 ms for 2%, 3%,
and 4% agarose, respectively, which was close to published values of 54, 39,
and 29 ms found in a different platform.5
Human Knee: Figure 5 shows selected raw images of the
knee imaged with the three T1rho sequences (Figure 5ABC), and the mean T1rho
values found in four ROIs (Figure 5D). For 3D FASE and 3D MAPSS sequences, the
mean T1rho values of the cartilage (29-38 ms in this study) were in the similar
range as those reported,6-8 while the meniscus
T1rho values (25-30 ms) were a little high compared to past reports (15-20 ms).
For 3D UTE T1rho, there is relatively little data available in literature. When
compared to a similar sequence (3D Cones T1rho), our values of cartilage (~26
ms) were similar to reported values in human patellar cartilage (~26 ms).9Conclusion
We have successfully developed and implemented
the two T1rho sequences, and validated them using agarose phantoms and
volunteer knees. All sequences were optimized to be clinically feasible (~5 min
or less) and yielded satisfactory results with consistent values in agarose
phantoms and human knees. Based on the cartilage T1rho values (around 30 to 40
ms), the present range of TSL (4 to 6 points up to TSL of 80 ms) appear
optimal. Acknowledgements
Research reported in this publication was supported in parts by Canon
Medical grants to Drs. Miyazaki and Bae, and by National Institute of Arthritis
and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases P30 AR073761 in support of Dr. Bae. The
content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily
represent the official views of the sponsoring institutions.References
1.
Duvvuri U,
Reddy R, Patel SD,et al. Magn Reson Med
38: 863-867, 1997.
2.
Menezes NM, Gray ML, Hartke JR, Burstein D. Magn Reson Med 51: 503-509, 2004.
3.
Wheaton AJ, Dodge GR, Elliott DM, Nicoll SB, Reddy R. Q Magn Reson Med 54: 1087-1093, 2005.
4.
Schooler J, Kumar D, Nardo L, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22: 51-62, 2014. PMCID:3934359
5.
Buck FM, Bae WC, Diaz E, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196: W174-179, 2011.
6.
Li X, Pedoia V, Kumar D, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23: 2214-2223, 2015.
7.
Knox J, Pedoia V, Wang A, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 26: 689-696, 2018.
8.
Kim J, Mamoto K, Lartey R, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 28: 1539-1550, 2020.
9.
Wu M, Ma YJ, Kasibhatla A, et al. Magn Reson Med 84: 2551-2560, 2020.