Jia Xu1, Baolian Yang2, Douglas Kelley2, and Vincent A. Magnotta1,3,4
1Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States, 2GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, United States, 3Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States, 4Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Software Tools, Shims
In this work, we proposed an
automated High Order Shim procedure for neuroimaging studies. The proposed
shimming procedure is fully automated and hence eliminates variability between operators.
The procedure performs automated real-time brain extraction to define the
region of interest (ROI) of the field map to be used in the shimming algorithm.
Automated High Order Shim has fewer image distortions and narrower spectral
linewidths than linear shimming and manual high-order shimming, suggesting its
superior performance in correcting B0 field homogeneity. The shimming
performance was assessed by acquiring EPI-based images and MR spectroscopy at
both 3T and 7T field strengths.
Introduction
Robust and automated shimming
procedures are fundamental to the success of MR techniques sensitive to B0
inhomogeneity, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and echo-planar
imaging (EPI). B0 inhomogeneity can cause unwanted signal loss, image
distortion, and spectral line broadening. There are mainly two classes of automatic shimming techniques:
projection-based shimming and image-based shimming. Image-based shimming
methods are suitable for arbitrary-shaped volumes such as human brains1. High-order shimming is usually used at high field strengths, e.g., 3T
and above, to overcome increased field inhomogeneity. For example,
the High Order Shim (HOS) software on GE MRI scanners calculates third-order
shim currents to minimize the B0 inhomogeneity within a given region of
interest (ROI) of the acquired gradient-echo-based field maps2. To date, most automatic shimming methods need a manually
defined shim ROI, which introduces intra- and inter-operator variability. In
this work, we propose an automated High Order Shim (autoHOS) prototype to
perform objective and automated high-order shimming based on automated brain
extraction3 for neuroimaging studies. Methods
Fig. 1 shows the flowchart of
automated HOS. The autoHOS prototype is developed in Python 3.8 and Tcl/Tk and
depends on HD-BET3 and GE HOS software2. First, a 3D field map covering the whole brain
(e.g., 25.6×25.6×25.6 cm3 box) with 128×128×64 pixel resolution is
acquired using a 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence. The magnitude images of the
3D field map are transferred to Volume Recon Engine (VRE), the image
reconstruction architecture of GE MRI scanners for automated brain extraction
with GPU. Alternatively, the magnitude images can be transferred to a remote computer
for automated brain extraction. Brain masks are generated by HD-BET in GPU mode
and applied to magnitude images of the field map. The obtained skull-stripped
magnitude images are then transferred back to the MRI host computer for
least-squares calculation of shim currents. By default, the autoHOS procedure
will automatically adjust the high order shims over the whole brain. However,
it also supports selection of smaller ROIs based on voxel placement for single-voxel
MRS applications (Fig. 2). Results
At 3T, HOS and autoHOS have fewer
distortions than linear shimming, while HOS and autoHOS perform similarly (Fig.
3). At 7T, autoHOS has fewer distortions compared to HOS and linear shimming
(Fig. 4). Notably, autoHOS is superior to HOS for MRS at 7T, as exemplified by
the narrower linewidth of both nonlocalized 31P MRS (Fig. 5A, ~48%
improvement) and 31P MRSI (Fig. 5B, ~12% improvement). Discussion
Among several popular automated
brain extraction tools, we chose the HD-BET prediction algorithm because it
needs little parameter tuning and is robust to cavities and abnormalities such
as tumors. The use of GPU on modern MRI hardware (e.g., SIGNA 7.0T, GE
Healthcare) or on a remote server has enabled real-time MRI reconstruction
based on deep learning, such as HD-BET. AutoHOS with a high-resolution 3D field
map (128×128×64) can be finished within 1~2 minutes. For EPI-based diffusion
tensor images (DTI) or gradient-echo EPI BOLD images, autoHOS is evidently
better than linear shimming but does not show considerable improvement compared
to HOS at 3T and 7T. This is because brain extraction does not remove all pixels
with possible phase offsets1, although the erroneous extracranial lipid pixels are
already stripped. While for both nonlocalized MRS and multivoxel MRSI at 7T,
autoHOS significantly improves the lineshapes, suggesting a better global B0
homogeneity can be achieved by this fully automated method.Conclusion
The autoHOS we present in this work
eliminates the need for additional user interaction while providing better B0
homogeneity than the existing HOS method. In the future, we will improve the
field map for shim calculation by utilizing brain masks generated as part of
the automated prescription algorithm on the scanner eliminating the need for the most time-consuming aspect of our current solution. In the future, we hope to
integrate this into the Pre-scan process, similar to coil calibration and
center frequency adjustment.Acknowledgements
This work was conducted on an MRI instrument funded by S10OD025025 and S10RR028821. References
(1)
Juchem, C.; Cudalbu, C.; de Graaf, R. A.; Gruetter, R.; Henning, A.;
Hetherington, H. P.; Boer, V. O. B0 shimming for in vivo magnetic resonance
spectroscopy: Experts' consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed 2021, 34 (5), e4350. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4350.
(2) Kim, D. H.; Adalsteinsson, E.; Glover, G. H.;
Spielman, D. M. Regularized higher-order in vivo shimming. Magn Reson Med 2002, 48 (4), 715-722. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10267.
(3)
Isensee, F.; Schell, M.; Pflueger, I.; Brugnara, G.; Bonekamp, D.; Neuberger,
U.; Wick, A.; Schlemmer, H. P.; Heiland, S.; Wick, W.; et al. Automated brain
extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks. Hum Brain Mapp 2019, 40 (17), 4952-4964.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24750.