Pei-Hsuan Kuo1, Shuu-Jiun Wang2,3,4, Jiing-Feng Lirng2,5, Shih-Pin Chen2,3,4, Chia-Hung Wu2,5, Yu Kuo2,5, and Chia-Feng Lu1
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, 4Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, 5Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Synopsis
Keywords: Blood vessels, Visualization
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) shows reversible diffuse constriction of the cerebral arteries. Previous studies proposed manual measurement of vasoconstriction. However, the stenosis estimated by comparing the stenosed with proximally normal diameter might result in an underestimate of vasoconstriction for the long-segmental stenosis. Accordingly, we developed a quantitative vessel analysis platform to measure the vasoconstriction rate by comparing vessel diameters between acute and remission MR angiography. Our platform provided objective measures of vasoconstriction and further confirmed that acute RCVS presented not only local vasoconstriction but a large portion of short- and long-segmental vasoconstriction in all artery segments.
Background and Purpose
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is characterized by thunderclap headache and diffuse segmental vasoconstriction that resolves spontaneously within three months. Previous reports have indicated that the constriction first involves small distal arteries and then progresses to major vessels as thunderclap headache remission1. MR angiography (MRA) is a widely used tool to evaluate vasoconstriction in patients with RCVS2. Although RCVS has been increasingly studied, an objective measurement tool of vasoconstriction is still lacked. Manual measurement of vasoconstriction extent was commonly performed by calculating the difference between stenosed diameter and normal diameter of the proximal segment2. However, for the case with stenosis involving the entire or long portion of artery segment, the estimate of normal diameter may be biased resulting in an underestimate of vasoconstriction. This study aimed to develop a quantitative vessel analysis platform to automatically calculate vessel diameter of cerebral arteries based on MRA and to further estimate the vasoconstriction rate in different cerebral artery segments by comparing acute and remission MRA in patients with RCVS.Materials and Methods
Thirty
patients were retrospectively recruited from Taipei Veterans General Hospital
to test our proposed platform. Each subject was diagnosed as RCVS based on the
criteria adopted in previous studies3,4, which was in line with “headaches
attributed to RCVS” in the International Classification of Headache Disorders,
third edition (ICHD-3; code 6.7.3)5.
MRA was performed during the acute stage (within 30 days after headache onset) and remission stage (around
3 months after onset) to estimate the vasoconstriction rate. The 3D-TOF MRAs were
acquired using a 3.0-T GE Discovery MR750 scanner with TR of 25 ms, TE of 2.9
ms, and voxel size of 0.39x0.39x0.50 mm3. The study was approved by
the local Institutional Review Board.
Several
postprocessing steps on the MRA were applied to reduce the discrepancy of
imaging parameters using our Vessel Analysis Platform (VAP) with a graphic user
interface built on MATLAB programming environment. The functions of VAP included
image coregistration, image preprocessing, vessel segmentation, vessel tracing,
diameter calculation, and artery labeling. The longitudinal coregistration
between acute and remission MRA images was first applied. The vessel segmentation
of the cerebral arteries was performed using intensity thresholding and 3D
region growing. Manually labeled seed points in the bilateral ICA and VA as the
starting points for vessel tracing. The first and second segments of the
anterior (A1 and A2), middle (M1 and M2), and posterior (P1 and P2) cerebral
arteries and basilar artery (BA) were then manually segmented in acute images
and mapped to the corresponding locations in remission images. The vessel
diameter was automatically calculated at each voxel located in the central axis
of vessel (Figure 1). In order to objectively
estimate the vasoconstriction rate for RCVS, the vessel diameters measured in acute
and remission stages were compared in each artery segment. A vasoconstriction
rate larger than 10% was treated as a stenosis. The processing workflow is
shown in Figure 1.Results and Discussion
Our VAP provided the display of 3D vessel
model, vessel skeleton (central axis), and color rendering of vessel diameter
and vasoconstriction rate. Figure 2A presents the stenosed regions manually labeled by an experienced
neuroradiologist and automatically detected by our platform. Furthermore, our
platform could also detect the underestimated stenosed regions because we used
the remission MRA as the reference rather than the proximal artery diameter in
the same scan. The comparison of diameter rendering between acute and remission
stages illustrated the long-segmental rather than local vasoconstriction in the
acute stage (Figure 2B). Figure 3 shows a
demonstrative case with no significant vasoconstriction of A1 could be
identified only based on acute images. However, more than 60% portion of A1 was
identified with vasoconstriction rate larger than 10% by comparing the acute
diameters with remission diameters in this RCVS case. Our results suggested
that RCVS may involve a longer segmental vasoconstriction rather than local
vasoconstriction in the acute stage.Conclusions
This
study proposed a new approach to estimate the vasoconstriction rate by
comparing the vessel diameter between acute and remission stage in RCVS. Our proposed platform provided an objective
measurement of short- and long-segmental vasoconstriction compared to the
conventional approach. We also concluded that stenosis could not only
occur in a local region but involve a long-segmental vasoconstriction in the
acute stage. Our platform and findings could benefit clinical diagnosis of
vasoconstriction and guide the clinical management of RCVS patients.Acknowledgements
This study was supported by
Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST110-2634-FA49-005 and MOST
109-2314-B-010-022-MY3).References
- Shimoda,
M., et al., Clinical significance of
centripetal propagation of vasoconstriction in patients with reversible
cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: A retrospective case-control study.
Cephalalgia, 2018. 38(12): p.
1864-1875.
- Chen, S.P., et al., Magnetic
resonance angiography in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes.
Ann Neurol, 2010. 67(5): p. 648-56.
- Chen, S.P., et al., Dynamic
Changes in White Matter Hyperintensities in Reversible Cerebral
Vasoconstriction Syndrome. JAMA Neurol, 2018. 75(9): p. 1106-1113.
- Wu, C.H., et al., Noninvasive
Characterization of Human Glymphatics and Meningeal Lymphatics in an in vivo
Model of Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage. Ann Neurol, 2021. 89(1): p. 111-124.
- Arnold, M.J.C., Headache
classification committee of the international headache society (IHS) the
international classification of headache disorders. 2018. 38(1): p. 1-211.