2224

Optimized, volumetric, isotropic-resolution T2W 2D FLAIR with high temporal and SNR efficiencies
Dahan Kim1, Tzu Cheng Chao1, Dinghui Wang1, and James G Pipe1
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States

Synopsis

Keywords: New Trajectories & Spatial Encoding Methods, New Trajectories & Spatial Encoding Methods, Spiral, FLAIR, LQ

We describe our novel T2W 2D FLAIR sequence whose temporal and SNR efficiencies are maximized by (1) an efficient IR acquisition that minimizes sequence deadtime and (2) localized quadratic encoding which eliminates SNR-inefficiencies of multi-pass 2D acquisitions. These improvements allowed our FLAIR scan to shorten the scan time while achieving higher SNR than standard SE and 2D-TSE scans of identical/equivalent scan time.

Introduction

T2-weighted (T2W) fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) scans reliably depict brain lesions often obscured in heavily T2-weighted images by bright cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) signal.1 However, the long inversion time (TI) required to null CSF degrades temporal efficiency of data sampling. ‘Interleaved’ IR acquisitions2 (Fig.1A) suffer from acquisition dead time between consecutive inversion or readout trains, as well as the dead time at the end of the TR. ‘Distributed’ IR schemes3,4 increase the temporal efficiency by continuously interleaving inversion and readout modules, but previous approaches require constraints on TI and/or TR, resulting in reduced flexibility and clinical utility. This temporal inefficiency is also compounded by SNR-inefficient multiple pass acquisitions, which acquires signal from only a subset of slices at a time. These inefficiencies lead to longer scan time and limited non-volumetric coverage of 2D FLAIR scans, which often lead to prescriptions with thick slice thickness and large slice gaps to compensate for the low SNR inefficiencies. In this work, we present a flexible T2W FLAIR sequence with high temporal and SNR efficiency. Our novel T2W FLAIR sequence consists of two innovations: (1) a temporally efficient and flexible IR acquisition technique, which continuously interleaves inversion and readout modules throughout the scan time (Fig.1B) while flexibly accommodating any user-desired TI and TR, and (2) localized quadratic (LQ) encoding5,6, which excites overlapping thick slabs and encodes them with a quadratic phase. LQ encoding results in an SNR improvement proportional to the square root of the slab thickness, by ensuring every pass acquires signals from nearly the entire imaging volume, not just from the slices acquired in the particular pass. This hybrid of 2D and 3D encoding eliminates the SNR-inefficiency associated with multi-pass acquisition, allowing contiguous volumetric coverage with improved SNR. Combined with SNR-efficient spiral spin-echo (SE) acquisitions7, together with maximally shortened scan time afforded by an efficient IR scheme, our approach results in isotropic-resolution volumetric T2W 2D FLAIR with high SNR and temporal efficiencies.

Methods

A multi-slice SE sequence was modified to enable LQ encoding by replacing the standard single-slice excitation RF pulse with a frequency-swept rectangular RF pulse. The frequency sweep makes the RF pulse resonant with spins across a slab of thickness $$$M\delta$$$ but encoded with different parts of the associated quadratic phase, where $$$\delta$$$ is the prescribed slice thickness and M is the slab-to-slice ratio determined by the extent of the frequency sweep. The LQ excitation was preceded by fat saturation and followed by a 180° refocusing RF pulse and a spiral in-out readout trajectory. This readout module (grouping) was continuously interleaved with an inversion module designed to invert a specific slice TI before the readout module’s excitation pulse. To achieve an accurate TI for every slice, the inversion module was uniformly distributed across the TR, with the readout modules placed in between, such that their excitations are placed TI after ‘inversion’ of their corresponding slices. If such placement result in an overlap between inversion and readout modules, then the number of interleaved inversion and readout modules per TR is reduced iteratively until such a placement is possible, thus satisfying both the user-prescribed TI and TR. T2W FLAIR scans were performed on a 3T scanner (Philips Ingenia) as N-pass multi-slice 2D acquisitions, using LQ-SE, SE, and TSE sequences, all with the same 5:30 scan time, 1.15mm isotropic resolution, 230x230x180mm FOV, and TI/TR=2345ms/7500ms. Slices in each pass had a center-to-center spacing of $$$N\delta$$$. For LQ-SE, where each excitation excites a slab of thickness $$$M\delta$$$, the slab thickness was limited to $$$M\delta<N\delta$$$ to avoid crosstalk, while the inversion and 180°-refocusing RF pulses were designed to invert and refocus the whole slab. The resulting LQ datasets, after all passes, contained overlapping slabs of thickness $$$M\delta$$$ centered at every slice position $$$\delta$$$ apart. After LQ reconstruction5,6, these slices were restored to a resolution $$$\delta$$$ along the slice direction (Fig.2). LQ-SE used M=3.2 for N=4. Further sequence-specific scan parameters are listed in Table 1.

Results

The use of SNR-efficient spiral trajectories alone enabled the T2W FLAIR SE sequence to produce a comparable SNR as 2D-TSE FLAIR (Fig.3). Addition of LQ encoding improved SNR over the SE and 2D-TSE scans, at the same scan time and identical (reconstructed) slice thickness. Quantified estimates of the SNR efficiency (Fig.4) show the LQ encoding improved the SNR by 1.71 (actual) over the SE scan (1.79 expected) and produced 1.3X-higher SNR than equivalent 2D-TSE sequence.

Discussion

In LQ encoding, each slice is excited roughly M times over the N separate passes required to collect all slices. This contrasts standard multi-slice acquisitions where each slice is acquired in only one of the N passes, with an effective data collection period of $$$T/N$$$, yielding $$$SNR \propto \sqrt{T/N}$$$, where T is the total scan time. The averaging effect of LQ encoding yields a $$$\sqrt{M}$$$ SNR increase, yielding $$$SNR \propto\sqrt{TM/N}$$$, while the quadratic phase of the RF pulse responsible for extended slice thickness $$$M\delta$$$ is corrected in the reconstruction to yield slice resolution $$$\delta$$$. Thus, LQ encoding eliminates the SNR inefficiencies associated with multi-pass 2D acquisitions. Combined with temporally efficient IR acquisition and SNR-efficient spiral trajectories, our technique yielded volumetric isotropic-resolution 2D T2W FLAIR with clinically acceptable SNR.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully receive research support from Philip

References

1. Brant-Zawadzki, M., Atkinson, D., Detrick, M., Bradley, W. G. & Scidmore, G. Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) for Assessment of Cerebral Infarction. Stroke 27, 1187–1191 (1996).

2. Park, H. W., Cho, M. H. & Cho, Z. H. Time-Multiplexed Multislice Inversion-Recovery Techniques for NMR Imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2, 534–539 (1985).

3. Oh, C. H., Hilal, S. K., Mun, I. K. & Cho, Z. H. An optimized multislice acquisition sequence for the inversion-recovery MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 9, 903–908 (1991).

4. Listerud, J., Mitchell, J., Bagley, L. & Grossman, R. OIL FLAIR: Optimized interleaved fluid-attenuated inversion recovery in 2D fast spin echo. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 36, 320–325 (1996).

5. Pipe, J. G. Spatial Encoding and Reconstruction in MRI with Quadratic Phase Profiles. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 33, 24–33 (1995).

6. Pipe, J. G. Analysis of localized quadratic encoding and reconstruction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 36, 137–146 (1996).

7. Kim, D., Wang, D., Chao, T. & Pipe, J. G. Volumetric T2-Weighted Spin-Echo MRI with Improved SNR Using Localized Quadratic Encoding. 2022 Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB. #0507.

Figures

Figure 1. Sequence for diagram for (A) conventional interleaved IR acquisition and (B) optimally efficient IR acquisition. Interleaved IR acquisition suffers from sequence deadtime within the trains of inversion and readout modules as well as at the dead time. Optimally efficient IR acquisition utilizes the sequence deadtime to acquire more slices within the TR, shorten the scan time, and eliminate the conventional heavy dependence of FLAIR scan time on TR. For example, our efficient FLAIR sequence reduced the scan times from 8:15 to 6:30 for the images shown in Figure 3.

LQ excitation utilizes a frequency sweep (equivalent to a quadratic phase) that makes the RF pulse resonant with spins across a slab of thickness , where δ is the desired slice resolution and M is the slab-to-slice ratio determined by the extent of the frequency sweep. Acquiring such an extended profile at every slice location makes each slice location acquired M times, each time encoded by different parts of the quadratic phase during the N-pass acquisition. Removing the quadratic phase in k-space results in sinc-shaped slice profile of resolution δ, without amplifying noise.

Figure 3. 2D FLAIR images acquired with standard SE, LQ-SE, and 2D-TSE, using identical scan parameters (e.g. scan time, resolution, FOV, etc.) as shown in Table 1. The 2D-TSE scan was x3 accelerated and is shown with regularized reconstruction. Using an SNR-efficient spiral trajectory and LQ encoding improved the LQ-SE scan’s SNR over SE and 2D-TSE scans (see Fig.4 for values). Despite the equivalent TE, 2D-TSE have lower apparent T2-contrast.

Figure 4. (Left) SNR efficiencies of standard SE, LQ-SE, and 2D-TSE scans, computed from two-dynamic scans that measured signal (RF and gradients on) and noise (RF and gradients off) subsequently. For 2D-TSE, fully-sampled data were acquired with no acceleration and 3x-longer scan time and linearly reconstructed without regularization for a fair comparison. The scan time difference was compensated by reporting SNR per square root of the scan time, as above. (Right) ROI used for SNR measurement.

Table 1. Scan parameters for the three FLAIR scans compared in Figure 3. 2D-TSE was prescribed with an effective TE (defined as the time when the k-space center is acquired) of 110ms such that, given the flip angle schedule, its equivalent TE (defined as the time for which magnetization undergoes T2-decay within the transverse plane) is matched with the other scans to achieve similar T2 weighting.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 31 (2023)
2224
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2023/2224