Yu Guo1, Weiqiang Dou2, Huimin Mao1, and Xinyi Wang1
1Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University&Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China, 2MR Research, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Stroke, Perfusion
The main purpose was to explore iron alterations
in gray matter (GM) nucleus of patients with unilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA)
stenosis or occlusion with varied cerebral perfusion states using
quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Sixty-one patients with unilateral
MCA stenosis or occlusion were divided into three groups based on different cerebral
perfusion patterns and examined with QSM. Iron-related susceptibility of GM
nucleus subregions were assessed. The results showed that iron deposition in bilateral
putamen and globus pallidus at the lesion side significantly increased in
patients with extensive impaired but not hypo- or normal cerebral perfusion.
Introduction
Intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) is the main
cause of ischemic stroke, especially in middle cerebral artery (MCA)1. For unilateral MCA stenosis or occlusion,cerebral perfusion may be impaired, causing a series of pathophysiological
reactions, such as iron deposition mediated oxidative stress2.
Iron is an essential trace element for human
body. The imbalance of iron homeostasis can cause neurotoxicity through
different mechanisms3. The quantitative determination of iron content
is crucial to evaluate the level of normal neurophysiological function.
Quantitative susceptibility imaging (QSM) is a promising MRI technique for
quantifying iron distribution in biological tissues4. It has been reported that after long-term ICAS,
abnormal iron metabolism may occur in multiple subregions of gray matter (GM)
nucleus5. Vascular stenosis may cause decrease cerebral
blood flow (CBF) with different patterns. The effect of different cerebral
perfusions on brain iron metabolism is however, still unclear6.
Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to explore
the feasibility of QSM in evaluating the iron changes of GM nuclear subregions for
patients with long-term unilateral MCA stenosis or occlusion but with different
cerebral perfusion statues.Materials and Methods
Subjects
61 MCA stenosis or occlusion patients were
included in this study and measured with 3D arterial-spin-labeling (ASL)for CBF assessment. Applying the Alberta-Stroke-Program-Early-CT
(ASPECTS) score system based on CBF measures for counting numbers of hypoperfusion
subregions7, all patients were divided into extensive hypoperfusion group (11 males and 8 females,
57.16±11.43 years), regional hypoperfusion group (13 males and 7 females, 51.25±13.35
years) and normal group (12 males and 10 females, 52.95±11.04 years).
MRI experiments
All experiments were performed on a 3T clinical
scanner (Discovery 750w, GE Healthcare, USA) equipped with a 32-channel coil. Conventional
DWI and magnetic-resonance-angiography (MRA) were measured.
3D-ASL and 3D spoiled-gradient-echo based QSM
imaging were performed for each participant. The scan parameters were of TR/TE=4632/10.54ms,
matrix=128×128, slice thickness=4mm, FOV=240mm×240mm, post-labeling delay
time=2050ms, scanning time = 4 minutes 41 seconds for 3D-ASL, and TEs = 8 (first
TE = 3.0 msec, TE interval = 3.1 msec), TR = 28.1 msec, FOV = 240 mm × 240 mm,
flip angle = 20°, matrix size = 240 × 240, slice thickness = 2 mm, number of
slices = 120, scanning time = 2 minutes 31 seconds for QSM.
Image Analysis
3D-ASL derived CBF mapping was obtained, using a vendor-provided
post-processing software on AW4.6 workstation (GE, USA). According to the ASPECTS
system, for each patient, the perfusion area of MCA was divided into ten regions-of-interest
(ROI)s per hemisphere(Fig.1), of which each region was counted for 1 point. When
hypoperfusion was found, the point for this area was subtracted from 10 points.
The final score was obtained for each patient, including 10 scores for normal
group, 6-9 scores for regional hypoperfusion group, and 0-5 for extensive-
hypoperfusion group. The relative CBF was calculated based on the following
equation:
rCBF=ischemic area CBF/contralateral mirror image
CBF.
The resultant rCBFs of 0.8-1.20 and < 0.80
were considered normal, and hypoperfusion, respectively7.
STI-Suite embedded in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick,
MA) was applied for QSM calculation8. The obtained QSM derived susceptibility maps
were used to manually draw ROIs in GM nucleus area, including bilateral caudate
nucleus (CN), putamen (PU), globus pallidus (GP), thalamus (TH), substantia
nigra (SN), red nucleus (RN) and dentate nucleus (DN) (Fig.1).
The mean CBF and susceptibility values of each
ROI as measured by two observers were obtained.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed in
Graphpad prism and IBM SPSS 26.0. Paired t-test was used to compare
susceptibility between bilateral GM nucleus subregions of three groups. If comparable
susceptibility was found between the affected and contralateral side, the mean level
was used in further statistical analyses. If a difference exited, the affected
and contralateral side were analyzed separately. The susceptibilities of GM nucleus
in three groups were compared by using ANOVA, and post-hoc t test was further
applied with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Significant
threshold was set as p < 0.05.Results
Paired t-test showed that PU and GP exhibited
significantly higher susceptibilities in the affected than contralateral sides in
extensive-hypoperfusion group (both P < 0.05;Fig.2,3), respectively.
Using one-way ANOVA, susceptibilities in PU and
GP were significantly different among three groups, respectively (F = 9.079, 3.815,
all P<0.05). With post-hoc t tests, for extensive-hypoperfusion group, significantly
increased susceptibilities were found in PU and GP at the lesion side relative
to normal and regional-hypoperfusion group (all P<0.05;Fig.2,4).Discussion and conclusions
In this study, QSM was used to investigate the
difference of iron content in GM nuclei of patients with long-term unilateral MCA stenosis or occlusion who were measured with varied
cerebral perfusion statuses by 3D-ASL. The results showed that the iron
deposition of PU and GP on the lesion side increased in patients with extensive
impaired cerebral perfusion rather than normal or regional hypoperfusion,indicating that abnormal iron metabolism might be
caused by intracranial hypoperfusion.
In conclusion, with QSM imaging, excessive iron deposition in certain functional GM
nuclei regions may suggest extensive cerebral ischemia hypoperfusion in
patients with MCA stenosis or occlusion.Acknowledgements
We thank Weiqiang Dou from GE Healthcare for this
valuable support on QSM imaging.References
1. Banerjee C, Chimowitz MI. Stroke
Caused by Atherosclerosis of the Major Intracranial Arteries. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):502-513.
2. Sekerdag E, Solaroglu I,
Gursoy-Ozdemir Y. Cell Death Mechanisms in Stroke and Novel Molecular and
Cellular Treatment Options. Curr
Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(9):1396-1415.
3. Hubler MJ, Peterson KR, Hasty AH.
Iron homeostasis: a new job for macrophages in adipose tissue? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2015;26(2):101-109.
4. Vinayagamani S, Sheelakumari R,
Sabarish S, et al. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Technical
Considerations and Clinical Applications in Neuroimaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;53(1):23-37.
5. Mao H, Dou W, Wang X, et al. Iron
Deposition in Gray Matter Nuclei of Patients With Intracranial Artery Stenosis:
A Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Study. Front Neurol. 2021;12:785822.
6. Lan L, Leng X, Ip V, et al.
Sustaining cerebral perfusion in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: The
roles of antegrade residual flow and leptomeningeal collateral flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40(1):126-134.
7. Wang X, Dou W, Dong D, et al. Can
3D Pseudo-Continuous Territorial Arterial Spin Labeling Effectively Diagnose
Patients With Recanalization of Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;54(1):175-183.
8. Li W, Avram AV, Wu B, Xiao X, Liu
C. Integrated Laplacian-based phase unwrapping and background phase removal for
quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR
Biomed. 2014;27(2):219-227.