Melanie Bauer1,2, Celine Berger1,2, Eva Scheurer1,2, and Claudia Lenz1,2
1Institute of Forensic Medicine of the University of Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Basel, Switzerland, 2Institute of Forensic Medicine of the University of Basel, Health Department Basel-Stadt, Basel, Switzerland
Synopsis
Keywords: Head & Neck/ENT, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques
Performing intravoxel
incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging offers the possibility to
differentiate various diffusion processes according to their varying molecule
speeds. In this study, the IVIM parameters perfusion fraction, diffusion and
pseudo-diffusion were determined in the human brain for 12 post mortem in situ
and 2 in vivo cases. Our results show that the IVIM parameters decrease after
death and that they are higher in gray matter than in white matter. Besides, the
age at death, the core temperature of the subjects and the post mortem interval
have an effect on the post mortem IVIM parameters.
Introduction
By using intravoxel
incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), different diffusion processes
can be quantified according to varying molecule speeds. The signal decay of
IVIM depends on the perfusion fraction (f) and the coefficients for diffusion
(D) and pseudo-diffusion (D*) 1,2. Several models, for example the
kurtosis (K) model, exist to consider the non-Gaussian behavior of the
diffusion caused by tissue structures like cellular compartments or membranes 2,3,4. In this study, the effect of IVIM on human in
situ post mortem (PM) diffusion parameters of the brain was analyzed and
possible influencing factors were investigated to enhance the insight into the
underlying properties. Furthermore, PM and in vivo IVIM parameters were
compared to identify their differences.Materials and Methods
In this study, 12
deceased and 2 living subjects were included. Age at death, rectal core
temperature and post mortem interval (PMI) distributions of the deceased are
shown in Table 1. The PM brain scans were performed in situ and on the same 3 T
MRI scanner used for the in vivo subjects. A diffusion-weighted
single-shot-echo-planar imaging sequence with 6 isotropically distributed
directions was acquired at 16 b-values (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160,
180, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 s/mm²). The following two-step model was applied
for the IVIM analysis: Firstly, D and K were determined for high b-values (> 200
s/mm²),
secondly, they were kept constant in order to calculate f and D* for all b-values. The fittings
were performed for white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM), separately, after
automatic segmentation of these regions. For the statistical analysis of the PM
cases, the Shapiro-Wilk test5 was applied to test the datasets for
normality before correlations were determined with the correlation coefficient
r and the p-value (significance level at p = 0.05) 6. The software MATLAB R2018 (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, United
States) and FSL 6.0.0 (FMRIB Software Library, Analysis Group7) were used for analyses.Results
The fits for PM
cases showed a slower decay than those for the living subjects in WM with good
intra-group congruence and inter-group difference (see Figure 1). In GM, these
separations were restricted by the fit of case PM 3, which lay between the
further PM and the in vivo cases.
An overview of the resulting averaged IVIM coefficients
is presented in Table 2. Successful fittings with the kurtosis model were
assumed as the product of D, K and b-value was less than 3 in all cases 2. For the PM cases, lower
values were obtained for f and D compared to the in vivo subjects. This
behavior was also found for D* in GM, while in WM, D* was similar in both groups.
The values for f and D were higher in GM than in WM. The same accounted for D* for
the in vivo group, while D* was similar in GM and WM for PM cases. K was
higher for PM cases than in vivo and higher in WM than in GM.
The statistical
analysis of the PM cases showed statistically significant correlations between
age and f in GM, age and D in GM, temperature and D in WM, PMI and f in WM and
PMI and D in WM (Table 3). Besides, the correlations between temperature and K as
well as PMI and K were statistically significant. Discussion
The steeper fitting curve of case PM 3 in GM can be explained by its excessive brain atrophy, which was attested during autopsy.
Although the blood
flow is missing, f does not level to 0% after death. To the same conclusion
came von Deuster et al.8 in a post mortem study of porcine hearts. The
influence of age at death on f and D can be explained by the fact that with increasing
age of adults, the brain shrinks as a natural process, which causes alterations
of brain volume and mass, especially in GM 9,10. The temperature
dependence of D agrees with the Einstein derivation of the Brownian motion 11,12.
The degradation, which accompanies the PMI, has an effect on the glial cells
and, hence, the WM, due to autolytic changes 13. D* seems to be
influenced by fatal intoxications, which are accompanied by cytotoxic cerebral
edema (see its high standard deviation in Table 2). As both the temperature and
the PMI have an effect on K, they influence the tissue structure of the
diffusion barriers 4,11,13. The resulting IVIM parameters for the in
vivo subjects correspond well with the already published results 4,9. Conclusion
The IVIM parameters
of PM cases are lower than those of living subjects and higher in GM than in WM.
While we were able to quantify the effect of age at death, core temperature of
the subjects and PMI on the PM IVIM parameters, also the cause of death should
be kept in mind as an influencing factor.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Le Bihan, D, et al.
MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent
motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology, 1986, 161(2), 401-407.
2. Le Bihan, D. What can we see with IVIM MRI?. NeuroImage, 2019, 187, 56-67.
3. Chabert, S, et al. Relevance of the information about the diffusion
distribution in vivo given by kurtosis in q-space imaging. In Proceedings of the 12th
Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Kyoto, Japan, 2004, Vol. 1238.
4. Jensen,
JH, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non‐gaussian
water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005,
53.6: 1432-1440.
5. BenSaïda, A. Shapiro-Wilk and Shapiro-Francia normality tests. https://ch.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/13964-shapiro-wilk-and-shapiro-francia-normality-tests?s_tid=prof_contriblnk.
MATLAB Central File Exchange, 2009.
6. Nagel, F. Point biserial correlation. https:// www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/11222-point-biserial-correlation. MATLAB Central File Exchange, 2006.
7. Jenkinson, M, et al.
Fsl, NeuroImage, 2012, 62 (2) 782–790.
8.
von Deuster, C, et al. Verification of the intra‐voxel incoherent motion (IVIM)
model in the porcine heart. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Canada, 2015.
9. Vieni, C, et al. Effect of intravoxel incoherent motion on diffusion
parameters in normal brain. NeuroImage,
2020, 204, 116228.
10.
Sungura, R, et al. The extended scope of neuroimaging and prospects in brain
atrophy mitigation: a systematic review. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery 23, 2021: 100875.
11. Berger, C, et al. Post mortem brain temperature and
its influence on quantitative MRI of the brain. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 35.3,
2022: 375-387.
12.
Einstein A et al. Investigations on the theory of the Brownian movement.
Methuen & Co. ltd., London, 1926.
13.
D’Arceuil, H, and de Crespigny, A. The effects of brain tissue decomposition on
diffusion tensor imaging and tractography. NeuroImage 36.1, 2007: 64-68.