Sachi Okuchi1, Yasutaka Fushimi1, Satoshi Nakajima1, Akihiko Sakata1, Takuya Hinoda1, Sayo Otani1, Azusa Sakurama1, Krishna Pandu Wicaksono1, Hiroshi Tagawa1, Yang Wang1, Satoshi Ikeda1, Shuichi ito1, Miyuki Takiya1, Kun Zhou2, and Yuji Nakamoto1
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 2Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Stroke, Artifacts
TGSE-BLADE
DWI has been reported to reduce geometric distortion and susceptibility
artifacts, however the long acquisition time prevent its clinical application. We
reduced acquisition time to 1 minute for TGSE-BLADE DWI using slice
acceleration (1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI). We compared distortion and artifacts
between SS-EPI DWI and 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI, and evaluated diagnostic
performance for acute infarctions of 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI. The result shows
that the 1-min TGSE-BLADE-DWI has better quality image in terms of distortion
and artifacts, and higher diagnostic performance for acute infarctions. TGSE-BLADE DWI with
slices acceleration is a promising method for evaluating lesions in
acute stroke patients.
INTRODUCTION:
Single-shot
echo planar imaging based diffusion-weighted imaging (SS-EPI DWI) is prone to susceptibility
artifacts in an inhomogeneous magnetic field. The 2D turbo gradient- and
spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging with non-Cartesian BLADE trajectory (TGSE-BLADE
DWI) is insensitive to B0 inhomogeneity related effects, leading to reduction
of geometric distortion and susceptibility artifacts.1 Several reports showed
clinical usefulness of TGSE-BLADE DWI,2-5 however, the long acquisition time prevents its
clinical application. To overcome this shortcoming, we applied simultaneous
multi-slice (SMS) acceleration technique in TGSE-BLADE DWI. Slice acceleration can be used to reduce scan
time and achieve higher resolution6, and has been widely
used in many applications. In this study, we achieved to reduce the acquisition
time of TGSE-BLADE-DWI to 1 minute, by employing slice acceleration technique. The
purpose of this study was to compare the distortion and the artifacts between the
SS-EPI DWI and the 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI, and to evaluate diagnostic performance
for acute infarctions in 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI.METHODS:
Subjects
Patients
with acute brain infarction or suspected brain infarction, or patients with
post-operative state for a brain tumor within a few days (mean age 66.9, range 18-93 years) were enrolled in this
institutional review board-approved study. Written informed consent was
provided by these patients.
Image
Acquisition
The two
DWI sequences (SS-EPI and a prototype 1-min TGSE-BLADE) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) sequence
for brain were performed using 3T-MR systems (MAGNETOM Skyra or MAGNETOM Prisma; Siemens
Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) with a 32-channel head coil or a 64-channel
head/neck coil. The detailed imaging parameters are shown in Figure 1.
Image
Analysis
The distortion was quantitatively examined by measuring the displacement
between T2WI sequence and each DWI sequence in three parts of brain: frontal
lobe near frontal sinus, temporal tip, and pons. Geometric distortion, susceptibility artifacts,
and overall image quality were assessed qualitatively using a 4-point Likert
scale (1, poor; 2, fair; 3, good; 4, excellent). In patients who had high
signal intensities on a trace-weighted image, lesion conspicuity and diagnostic
confidence were assessed using a 4-point Likert scale2.
Regions-of-interest (ROIs) were
placed on high signal intensity lesions, centrum semiovale (CS) and the pons in
the ADC maps. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated as SNRcs = SIcs / SDcs and SNRpons
= SIpons / SDpons in all patients, and the contrast-to-noise
ratio (CNR) was calculated as CNR = (SIlesion - SIcs)
/ SDcs in patients with high signal intensity lesions.
Statistical
Analysis
The
lengths and scores were compared between SS-EPI DWI and 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI using
Wilcoxon signed-rank test. SNR and CNR were compared among them using paired t-test
because a dataset of them follows a normal distribution. P value less
than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was
performed using MedCalc version 20.111.
RESULTS:
Out
of 62 patients with acute cerebral infarction or suspected cerebral infarction,
abnormal high signal intensities suggesting acute or subacute cerebral infarctions
were detected in 29 patients (Figure 2), and in the remaining 33 patients, no abnormal
high signal intensity was detected.
Nineteen
patients who had undergone surgery within a few days before brain MRI were also
enrolled, and high signal intensity lesions suspected of postoperative changes
or acute infarctions were evaluated on DWI (Figure 3). Six patients had acute
or subacute infarctions that were detectable only in 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI, but
not in SS-EPI DWI. No lesion was detectable only in SS-EPI DWI.
The
distortion in frontal lobe, temporal tip, pons was statistically less in 1-min TGSE-BLADE
DWI than in SS-EPI DWI (P<0.0001)
(Figure 4).
The scores for geometric distortion, susceptibility artifacts, overall image quality were better
in 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI than SS-EPI (P<0.0001). The scores for lesion
conspicuity and diagnostic confidence were better in 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI than
in SS-EPI DWI (P<0.0001)
(Figure 5).
SNR
was lower in 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI (15.5 ± 3.2) than in SS-EPI DWI (16.9 ± 4.8) in
CS (P=0.001). However, no statistical differences were observed in SNR of
the pons (SS-EPI DWI, 6.0 ± 1.9; TGSE-BLADE DWI, 5.6 ± 1.2) and CNR (SS-EPI DWI,
11.8 ± 5.0; TGSE-BLADE DWI, 12.2 ± 4.7). DISCUSSION:
The
distortion was significantly less in TGSE-BLADE-DWI near the air-bone
interfaces (e.g., frontal lobe, temporal tip, and pons), which is consistent
with previous reports of TGSE-BLADE DWI without slice acceleration.5 A few acute
infarctions were detected only in 1-min TGSE-BLADE DWI; however, no lesions
were detectable only in SS-EPI DWI. The scores for lesion conspicuity and
diagnostic confidence were better in
TGSE-BLADE DWI. These results suggest that TGSE-BLADE DWI using slice
acceleration is a promising method that has a good image quality and less
artifacts, and more useful for diagnosis of acute infarctions in clinical
practices.
SNR
for TGSE-BLADE DWI was slightly lower than SS-EPI DWI in CS, however, had no
statistical differences in pons. Despite this disadvantage of 1-min TGSE-BLADE
DWI in SNR, its ability to detect lesions near susceptibility artifacts is a
strong advantage. CONCLUSION:
TGSE-BLADE
DWI using slice acceleration has better image quality regarding distortion and
artifacts than SS-EPI DWI, and higher diagnostic performance for acute
infarctions. The acquisition time of 1 minute is clinically acceptable in evaluation
of acute stroke and postoperative complications. Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Mr. Yuta Urushibata, Siemens Healthineers Japan, for their useful comments on this study.References
1. Hu
HH, McAllister AS, Jin N, et al. Comparison of 2D BLADE Turbo Gradient- and
Spin-Echo and 2D Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Brain MRI at 3 T:
Preliminary Experience in Children. Acad
Radiol 2019; 26(12): 1597-604.
2. Fu
Q, Kong XC, Liu DX, et al. Clinical comparison of single-shot EPI,
readout-segmented EPI and TGSE-BLADE for diffusion-weighted imaging of
cerebellopontine angle tumors on 3 tesla. Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 84:
76-83.
3. Geng
Y, Shi Y, Chen W, et al. BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo in the assessment
of sinonasal lesions: a comprehensive comparison of image quality in
readout-segmented echo-planar imaging. Acta
Radiol 2021: 2841851211041820.
4. Sheng
Y, Hong R, Sha Y, Zhang Z, Zhou K, Fu C. Performance of TGSE BLADE DWI compared
with RESOLVE DWI in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma. BMC Med Imaging 2020; 20(1):
40.
5. Okuchi
S, Fushimi Y, Yoshida K, et al. Comparison of TGSE-BLADE DWI, RESOLVE DWI, and
SS-EPI DWI in healthy volunteers and patients after cerebral aneurysm clipping.
Sci Rep 2022; 12(1): 17689.
6. Li
X, Zhu H, Sun K, Chai W, Fu C, Yan F. Is simultaneous multi-slice
readout-segmented echo-planar imaging valuable for predicting molecular
subtypes of breast cancer? Eur J Radiol
2022; 150: 110232.