Mayumi Higashi1, Masahiro Tanabe1, Masatoshi Yamane2, Mahesh B. Keerthivasan3, Hiroshi Imai 4, Teppei Yonezawa2, and Katsuyoshi Ito1
1Department of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan, 2Department of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan, 3MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, New York, NY, United States, 4MR Research and Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare K.K., Tokyo, Japan
Synopsis
Keywords: Liver, Liver
The
purpose of this study was to elucidate
the clinical importance of T1 mapping of the liver with the water component only using
the 2D DIXON Look-Locker sequence. T1 values of the liver were compared
among T1 maps obtained by IP, OP and DIXON Look-Locker sequences. T1 values of the
liver on the T1 maps obtained
from IP- and OP-based sequences were significantly influenced by an
increased fat component. In contrast, the T1 value of the liver on the T1 maps with the water component only calculated from DIXON water images was unlikely to be influenced
by hepatic steatosis.
Introduction
T1
mapping on MRI has been shown to be useful for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic
fibrosis 1. Previous studies have indicated that T1 mapping has potential
to be a valuable tool for diagnosing chronic liver disease and determining its
severity 2,3. Although fibrosis increases the T1 values in the
liver, fat tissue also leads to increased T1 values of the liver on T1 mapping
obtained via the Look-Locker opposed-phase-based
sequence 4. This may make it difficult to assess hepatic fibrosis,
which is of diagnostic significance, using the current T1 mapping in patients
with chronic liver disease with hepatic steatosis. Therefore, T1 mapping
without the influence of fat is required for the accurate evaluation of the
presence and severity of liver fibrosis. Recent studies have proposed several
new imaging-based methods for fat-/water-separated T1 mapping of the liver,
such as magnetic resonance fingerprinting with dictionary-based fat-water
separation technique and Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel sequence with
Dixon techniques, to exclude the influence of fat in the T1 measurement 5,6.
However, these studies included
only a small number of patients or
volunteers, and the use of fat-/water-separated T1 maps obtained from
these sequences is still limited in most clinical environments. The purpose of
this study was to elucidate the clinical
importance of T1 mapping of
the liver with the water component only obtained via the two-dimensional
(2D) DIXON Look-Locker sequence in daily practice.Methods
This retrospective study included 162
patients with suspected hepatobiliary or pancreatic diseases who underwent
upper abdominal MR imaging including T1 mapping and fat fraction (FF) mapping on
3T MRI (Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma). A prototype 2D two-point DIXON Look-Locker sequence 7 was used to obtain T1
mapping with the water component only. Additionally, in-phase (IP)
and opposed-phase (OP) Look-Locker imaging without DIXON were
also performed separately to obtain T1 mapping for comparison. We measured the T1 values and fat signal fraction (FSF) of the liver on each T1 and FF maps using operator-defined regions of
interest (ROIs). The T1 values
of the liver were compared among T1 maps obtained by IP, OP
and DIXON sequences. Patients were classified
into 3 groups according to FSF of the liver, as follows: group 1, FSF
< 5%; group 2, 5% ≤ FSF < 10%; and group 3, FSF ≥ 10%. In addition, T1 and FF maps of the phantoms with various volume
ratios of fat and water components were evaluated to verify the validity of the clinical study. Statistical analysis was performed
using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson’s product
moment correlation coefficient analysis.Results
The mean T1
values of the liver on the IP images were significantly lower than those on the
DIXON water images (p < 0.001), while the mean T1 values of the liver
on the OP images were significantly higher than those on the DIXON water images
(p < 0.001). The T1 value of the liver on the IP images
was significantly shorter in group 3 (568 ± 62 msec) than in groups 1
(653 ± 73 msec) or 2 (615 ± 59 msec) (p < 0.001). The T1 value of the liver
on the OP images was significantly longer in group 3 (776
± 120 msec) than in groups 1
(687 ± 85 msec) or 2 (696 ± 84 msec) (p < 0.001). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the
T1 value of the liver on the DIXON water images among
the 3 groups (p = 0.252). Regarding T1
and FF maps of the phantoms, the T1 value on the IP images showed a significant
negative correlation with the FSF (r = -0.985,
p = 0.002). The T1 value on the OP
images showed a significant positive correlation with the FSF (r =
0.959, p = 0.010). Conversely, no significant correlation was found
between the T1 value on the DIXON water images and
FSF (r = -0.032, p = 0.960).Discussion
Our
study findings showed that the T1 values of the liver on the T1 maps obtained from IP- and OP-based
sequences were significantly influenced by an increased fat component.
This suggests that T1 mapping without the influence of fat is needed to accurately
evaluate the T1 value of the liver, especially in patients with chronic liver
disease accompanying hepatic steatosis. In
contrast, on the T1 maps calculated from DIXON water
images, our finding
showed that the T1 value of the liver was less
strongly influenced by the presence of fat. These results were confirmed by the phantom
results that the T1 values on the IP and OP images showed strong correlations
with the FSF, while the T1 value on the DIXON water
images showed no significant correlation with the FSF. Our results indicate
that T1 mapping of the
liver with the water component only obtained from the 2D DIXON Look-Locker sequence may be useful for accurately assessing
hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease and hepatic
steatosis.Conclusion
The T1 value of
the liver on T1 mapping with the water
component only using the 2D DIXON Look-Locker method was unlikely to be
influenced by hepatic steatosis.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Banerjee R, Pavlides M, Tunnicliffe EM, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance for the non-invasive diagnosis of liver disease. Journal of hepatology 2014;60:69-77.
2.
Haimerl M, Verloh N, Zeman F, et al.
Assessment of clinical signs of liver cirrhosis using T1 mapping on
Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3T MRI. PloS one 2013;8:e85658.
3.
Cassinotto C, Feldis M, Vergniol J, et al.
MR relaxometry in chronic liver diseases: Comparison of T1 mapping, T2 mapping,
and diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing cirrhosis diagnosis and severity.
European journal of radiology 2015;84:1459-1465.
4.
Mozes FE, Tunnicliffe EM, Pavlides M,
Robson MD. Influence of fat on liver T1 measurements using modified Look-Locker
inversion recovery (MOLLI) methods at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:105-111.
5.
Jaubert O, Arrieta C, Cruz G, et al. Multi-parametric
liver tissue characterization using MR fingerprinting: Simultaneous T(1) , T(2)
, T(2) *, and fat fraction mapping. Magnetic resonance in medicine
2020;84:2625-2635.
6.
Feng L, Liu F, Soultanidis G, et al.
Magnetization-prepared GRASP MRI for rapid 3D T1 mapping and fat-/water-separated
T1 mapping. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2021;86:97-114.
7.
MB Keerthivasan, X
Zhong, MD Nickel, et al. Simultaneous T1 and Fat Fraction Quantification using Multi-Echo
Radial Look-Locker Imaging. Proceedings of the ISMRM, 2020