Xinyi Gou1, Yi Wang2, Lingli Zhou3, Jianxiu Lian4, Zilong Chen4, Xiuying Zhang3, Jingyi Cheng1, Lei Chen1, Nan Hong1, and Jin Cheng1
1Department of Radiology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, 3Department of Endocrinology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China, 4Philips Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Image Reconstruction, Software Tools
For patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO)
presenting unilateral upper eyelid retraction, the phenomenon that the impaired
eye is lower than the healthy eye (“eyeball descending”) has been noticed. This study investigated the
eyeballs' position changes by 3D reconstitution of magnetic resonance (MR)
images. With reference
to the central plane of the healthy side, 70.37% impaired eyeballs (19/27) were found in significantly lower positions,
and with significant positive correlations of increased thicknesses of levator
palpebrae superioris (LPS), superior rectus (SR), and LPS-SR complex volume.
This study provided objective evidence of “eyeball descending” in unilateral
upper eyelid retraction TAO patients.
Introduction
Thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO), known as
Graves’ ophthalmopathy, is an autoimmune disease that impairs appearance and
vision. Upper eyelid retraction is one of the most common clinical features of
TAO1. In
clinical practice, the phenomenon has been observed that the impaired eyeball’s
position is lower than the healthy one among TAO patients with unilateral upper
eyelid retraction (Figure 1). There were three presumptions to explain the phenomenon: 1)visual
deviation due to increased margin reflex distance (MRD) or 2) eyeball rotation2;
and 3) eyeball in a real lower position.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the position changes of eyeballs
in TAO patients presenting unilateral upper eyelid retraction by 3D
reconstitution of magnetic resonance (MR) images, which may provide an objective evidence for treatment decision-making. Methods
Twenty-seven TAO patients (Average age,34.81 ± 9.802
years; range, 20-58 years; five males, twenty-two females) , with the only
clinical presentation of unilateral upper eyelid retraction were included in
this study. Moreover, the difference of proptosis wasn't more than 1mm in each patient. Standardized orbital MR were performed
by 3.0T system (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands).
The following shows the post-processing process on 3D slicer software (version 5.0.3): Firstly, on coronal T2-weighted SPIR orbital
images, the direction and distance of the eyeball’s horizontal plane of the
impaired side from the healthy eyeball’s reference plane were measured, as well
as the thickness of the levator palpebrae superioris (LPS) muscle and superior
rectus (SR) muscle (Figure 3A). Secondly, 3D images were reconstructed from coronal
T2-weighted SPIR MR imaging and then measured direction and angle of eyeball’s
rotation compared to healthy eye (Figure 3B). Thirdly, LPS-SR complex volume were
calculated at reconstructed oblique sagittal MR images. Statistical analyses
were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (SPSS version 29.0). One sample Wilcoxon test and Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze the quantitative data. Correlation between these
variables was performed by using the spearman correlation.
Results
In this study, eyeballs of 70.37% patients (19/27) were in a
lower position, with reference to the central plane of the healthy eyes. The mean descending
distance of 27 patients was 0.97 ± 1.73mm (p = 0.008).All 27 patients had a thicker SR on the impaired side (6.97 ± 2.52mm vs. 4.23 ± 0.93mm, p<0.001). Moreover, 96.30%(26 / 27 )patients presented with LPS hypertropia on the
impaired side ( 4.73 ± 1.36mm vs 3.29 ± 1.08mm, p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between descent distance in the impaired
eyes and increased thickness of LPS (R= 0.553, p = 0.003). Moreover, the descent distance was also correlated with
increased thickness of SR (R= 0.426, p = 0.027) and increased LPS/SR
complex volume (R = 0.385, p = 0.048). However, there was no significant correlation between the descent distance and the
rotation angle of the impaired eye (R= -0.031, p = 0.876). According to
the rotation direction of the impaired eyeball on reconstructed oblique
sagittal MR images, patients were divided into two groups: the down-rotation
and the up-rotation groups. In the down-rotation group, the rotation angle had
a significant correlation with the increased thickness of SR (R = 0.698, p = 0.008). In the up-rotation group, the rotation angle had significant
correlation with descent distance (R = 0.593, p = 0.026) and the
increased thickness of LPS (R = -0.575, p = 0.032) (Figure 4). Discussion
In
this study, the impaired eyeball of descended compared to that of the healthy
eye in 70.37% of twenty-seven TAO patients with unilateral upper eyelid
retraction. Moreover, the descent distance was positively correlated with the increased thickness of LPS,
SR, and LPS-SR complex volume. It was confirmed increased LPS-SR complex volume was associated with unilateral
upper eyelid retraction in TAO patients2. It
indicated the eyeballs’ descending was associated with pathological changes of
LPS and SR, not a pure visual deviation.
SR and LPS are referred to as the LPS-SR complex. However, due to the
different positions of the muscle belly, they could be distinguished when their
incrassation is caused by
TAO. Therefore, the thicknesses of the SR and LPS were
measured separately in this study. Compared with the thickened SR, the
thickened LPS has a greater correlation with the eyeballs’ descending. A
possible explanation is the different positions between the thickened LPS and SR (Figure 5).
It's also observed the rotation
angle was correlated with the increased thickness of SR muscle in the
down-rotation group. Furthermore, the increased thickness of LPS had a negative
correlation with the rotation angle in the up-rotation group, but the increased
thickness of SR didn’t show a significant correlation. It’s likely to be related to restrictions
from the thickened LPS or SR. A previous study found because of the restriction
from an enlarged LPS/SR
complex, the majority of TAO patients with LPS/SR complex hypertropia suffered
from ipsilateral vertical strabismus3.
Meantime, that means the phenomenon of eyeball descending on clinical pictures could
partially be caused by virtual deviation, especially in patients with SR prominent enlargement. Conclusions
Eyeball’s descending of the eyeball in TAO patients with unilateral upper eyelid retraction was associated with pathological changes of LPS and SR, rather than a pure visual deviation. Acknowledgements
No
acknowledgement.References
1. Bahn, R. S.
Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med 362, 726–738 (2010).
2. Byun, J. S. & Lee, J. K. Relationships between eyelid
position and levator-superior rectus complex and inferior rectus muscle in
patients with Graves’ orbitopathy with unilateral upper eyelid retraction. Graefes
Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256, 2001–2008 (2018).
3. Wang, Y. et al. Thyroid eye disease presenting with
superior rectus/levator complex enlargement. Orbit 39, 5–12
(2020).