El-Sayed H. Ibrahim1, John LaDisa1, and Joy Lincoln1
1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Cardiovascular, Valves, congenital heart disease
Bicuspid
Aortic Valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart disease affecting 1-2%
of all live births. Current clinical management includes periodic surveillance
of aortic valve dysfunction, and only when the valve becomes stenotic is
intervention recommended, which includes surgical procedures that come with
insuperable long-term outcomes. We optimized a small-animal MRI protocol for
comprehensive evaluation of the BAV structure, function, flow pattern, and
tissue characterization. Children and adolescents with BAV would benefit from this
comprehensive assessment of their risk profile during early stages of the disease
to better predict outcomes and clinical management strategies.
Introduction
Bicuspid
Aortic Valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart disease affecting 1-2%
of all live births and arises due to the abnormal fusion of two of the three
valve cusps during embryonic development. However, it is not the primary
structural malformation that enforces the need for treatment in young adults,
but the accelerated development of life-threatening critical aortic stenosis
(AS) as a result of premature calcification in up to 50% of patients;
particularly those with right and non-coronary (R/NC) cusp fusion. Despite the
anticipated onset of calcification and AS in children and adolescents with BAV,
current clinical management includes periodic surveillance of aortic valve
dysfunction, and only when the valve becomes stenotic is intervention
recommended. This includes balloon valvuloplasty for high-risk operable
patients, or transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement for patients at
low or intermediate operative risk; however, relief is variable and largely
suboptimal, and surgical procedures come with insuperable long-term outcomes. Therefore,
children and adolescents with BAV would benefit from a comprehensive non-invasive
evaluation of their risk profile during early stages of disease to better
predict outcomes and clinical management strategies, which is investigated in
this study on a genetic mouse model of BAV.Methods
The developed imaging protocol and pulse sequences were optimized
on a small-animal Bruker 9.4T MRI scanner. The protocol included sequences for
imaging valvular structure, function, flow pattern, and tissue characterization
for comprehensive assessment of BAV in a genetically modified mouse model (Nfatc1cre;Exoc5fl/+). Proper animal
setup is essential for ensuring adequate image quality and avoiding artifacts. Three-lead
ECG patch electrodes were used due to their better performance compared to
needle electrodes. The ECG wires were twisted and run along the center of the
magnet bore to minimize signal noise. Valve structure and function information
was obtained using cine imaging with either ECG gating or retrospective intra-gating,
where the latter allows for 3D imaging capability with improved temporal and
spatial resolutions, albeit at the cost of increased scan time. Optimized
imaging parameters for cine imaging are as follows: FLASH sequence, slice
thickness = 0.8 mm, TR = 7.6 ms, TE = 2.7 ms, matrix = 145x192, FOV = 25 mm, readout
bandwidth = 385 Hz/pixel, # cardiac phases = 14-50, slip angle = 10°, #
averages = 1. Blood flow pattern through the valve was obtained using
phase-contrast (PC) imaging with minimum repetition time (TR) to improve
temporal resolution. Optimized imaging parameters for PC imaging are as
follows: 2D ECG-gated FLASH sequence, slice thickness = 0.8 mm, TR = 7.4 ms, TE
= 3 ms, matrix = 176x176, FOV = 25 mm, readout bandwidth = 338 Hz/pixel, #
cardiac phases = 12, slip angle = 15°, # averages = 6, VENC = 250 cm/s. Finally,
multicontrast T1/T2/PD weighted spin-echo sequences were used to assess
valvular tissue characterization. Optimized imaging parameters for T1-weighted
imaging are as follows: ECG-gated RARE sequence, slice thickness = 0.8 mm, TR =
500 ms, TE = 9 ms, matrix = 125x125, FOV = 25 mm, readout bandwidth = 769
Hz/pixel, slip angle = 90°, # averages = 1. The imaging parameters for
T2-weighted imaging were the same as T1-weighted imaging, except for: TR =
2500ms, TE = 20 ms, readout bandwidth = 340 Hz/pixel. The imaging parameters
for PD-weighted imaging were the same as T2-weighted imaging, except for: TR = 2500ms,
TE = 9 ms. The multicontrast imaging parameters were optimized based on the
animal’s heart and respiratory rates to acquire data during late diastole with
trigger delay ~ 80 ms during minimal valve motion. Circle cvi42 software was
used to process the resulting images. Results
The optimized protocol produced clinically useful images in a
reasonable scan time (1-2 hours depending on selected pulse sequences and type
of acquisition (2D vs 3D)). Figure 1 shows the aorta and cross-sections of
normal tricuspid aortic valve during diastole (valve closed) and systole (valve
open). Figure 2 shows a cross-section of BAV in two mice, showing clearly the
bicuspid formation as well as abnormal valve structure. Figure 3 shows PC
magnitude and phase images across the aortic valve and generated flow pattern
in BAV, which is distinguished from that in normal valve. Figure 4 shows
multicontrast T1, T2, and PD weighted images of the aortic valve, where
different signal intensities in the images can be used to study valve tissue
composition, e.g., lipid, fat, edema, and calcification. Conclusions
The developed optimized MRI protocol provides complementary
cardiovascular information for biomechanical assessment of BAV. A comprehensive
biomechanical assessment of BAV prior to the onset of calcification will allow for
exploring opportunities to improve early diagnoses by predicting the temporal
onset of calcification in those most at risk based on imaging data and to create
assays that track the molecular and cellular mechanisms. Therefore, children
and adolescents with BAV would benefit from this comprehensive assessment of
their risk profile during early stages of the disease to better predict
outcomes and clinical management strategies.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Siu
et al. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010; 55:2789–2800
2. Teekakirikul
et al. HGG Adv. 2021; 2(3):100037
3. Kandail
et al. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018; 86:131-142
4. Yassine
et al. Front. Physiol. 2017;8:687
5. Choudhury
et al. Atherosclerosis. 2002;162(2):315-21