Shao ru zhang1, Zhi qiang Chen2, Xiao hua Chen1, Zhuo Wang1, Yun shu Zhou1, Shi li Liu1, Ruo di Zhang1, Yu hui Xiong3, and Bing Chen4
1Clinical medicine school of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China, 2Department of Radiology ,the First Hospital Affiliated to Hainan Medical College, Haikou, China, 3GE Healthcare, Beijing, China, 4Department of Radiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Tumors, Radiomics
This study aims to explore the value of multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics model for non-invasively predicting IDH1 mutation in glioma. It was shown that among various single-sequence radiomics models, the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image radiomics model should be considered as an optimal model in predicting IDH1 mutation, while the combined model based on three sequences could further improve the predicting performance.
Summary of Main Findings
Multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics model could non-invasively predict IDH1 mutation in glioma.Synopsis
This
study aims to explore the value of multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics model
for non-invasively predicting IDH1 mutation in glioma. It was shown that among
various single-sequence radiomics models, the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted
image radiomics model should be considered as an optimal model in predicting
IDH1 mutation, while the combined model based on three sequences could further
improve the predicting performance.Introduction
Gliomas
are the most common primary malignant tumor in brain, and its various molecular
characteristics can lead to extensive biological characteristics and clinical
heterogeneity1-3. The importance of tumor molecular characteristics was
emphasized on the 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous
system4, which revealed that the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation type
patients had a better prognosis than the IDH wild type5, 6. At present, the
most commonly used method to assess IDH mutation status is molecular assay
after biopsy or surgical resection. However, the biopsy has bias in the tissue
taken, which may lead to the deviation of results, and the quality of the
tissue may be too poor to complete the molecular detection7. Radiomics is a
powerful tool in exploiting more tumor features that cannot be recognized by
the image reviewing, which can reflect the heterogeneity of tumor more
comprehensive and repeatable1,8. The purpose of the study was to explore the
value of Multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics model in predicting IDH1 mutation
in glioma non-invasively.Material and Methods
A
total of 144 patients with gliomas confirmed by pathology from January 2016 to
July 2022 in our hospital were retrospectively included. All patients underwent
MR exams on a 3.0T scanner (SIGNATM Excite, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA)
with an 8-channel head coil before surgery. The scan sequences included routine
axial T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion
recovery (T2-FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI). The
parameters were as follows: FOV = 24 × 24 cm2, slice thickness/gap = 6/1mm,
T2WI, TR/TE = 4600/107ms; T2-FLAIR, TR/TE = 7800/140ms; CE-T1WI, TR/TE =
2300/13ms; A total volume of 0.1 mmol/kg of Gd-DTPA was injected
intravenously before CE-T1WI scanning. Clinical and MRI imaging features
were also collected (Table 1). All patients were randomly divided into training (n=101) and
testing (n=43) sets at a 7:3 ratio. ITK-SNAP software was used to delineate the
region of interest (ROI) and the radiomics features were extracted by the
"Pyradiomics" package in Python3.7 software. ROIs were drawn to cover
the core of tumor excluded peritumoral oedema in high-grade
glioma and the whole tumor in low-grade glioma (Figure1). For the statistical analysis,
firstly the independent Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to
initially screen out the features with statistically significant differences (P
< 0.05), then the Pearson correlation analysis and the least absolute
shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to select the optimal
feature which is highly correlated with IDH1 mutation status to construct
radiomics labels and calculate the radiomic score (RADSCORE). Finally, we used
the logistic regression algorithm to construct three models from the T2WI,
T2-FLAIR, and CE-T1WI sequences respectively as well as a combined model using
them all. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using area under the
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC), the workflow of this
study was in Figure 2.Results
No
statistically significant difference was found in the baseline characteristics
between the training and testing groups (P > 0.05). There were statistically
differences in enhancement degree, oedema degree, enhancement style, Ki-67
expression level and WHO-grade between IDH-mutated and IDH-wild groups (as
shown in Table 1). At last, each sequence can extract 1037 radiomic features
included first-order statistical features, shape features, gray level
co-occurrence matrix, gray level dependence matrix, gray level run length
matrix, gray level size zone matrix, neighboring gray tone dependence matrix
and filtering features. After feature screening, there are 9, 10, 14, 12
features for T2WI, T2-FLAIR, CE-T1WI, T2WI+T2Flair+CE-T1WI models,
respectively. Among single-sequence radiomics models, the diagnostic efficacy
of CE-T1WI and T2WI models were better than that of T2-FLAIR model, and the
CE-T1WI model had the best prediction performance. Its AUC values in the
training and testing groups were 0.824 and 0.822. The diagnostic efficiency of
the combined model based on three sequences was better than all the
single sequence radiomics models, its AUC values in the training and testing
groups were 0.844 and 0.853 (Table 2, Figure 3).Discussion and Conclusion
Our study demonstrated that the CE-T1WI
model had the best prediction performance. As the preferred MRI sequence for
the diagnosis of brain tumors, CE-T1WI can clearly show the solid and necrosis
of tumors. Our study also found that multi-sequence had a better performance
than one with single sequence. He et al9 reported that multi
sequence model can better predict glioma biomarker status preoperatively, this
result was in accordance with us. The reason may be that complementary
information among Multi-parametric MRI could provide a more comprehensive
understanding of tumor heterogeneity10. To conclusion, multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics
model could non-invasively predict IDH1 mutation in glioma, however, the
performance of different sequences is different, multiple-sequence based
radiomics model could improve the prediction efficiency.Acknowledgements
Thank you very much for reading my contribution in your busy schedule. I wish you good health and all the best.References
1.Brancato
V, Cerrone M, Lavitrano M, et al. A systematic review of the current status and
quality of radiomics for glioma differential diagnosis.
Cancers2022;14(11):2731.
2.Miller
KD, Ostrom QT, Kruchko C, et al. Brain and other central nervous system tumor
statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians2021;71(5):381-406.
3.Wu
Y, Guo Y, Ma J, et al. Research progress of gliomas in machine learning.
Cells2021;10(11):3169.
4.Gritsch
S, Batchelor TT, Gonzalez Castro LN. Diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic
implications of the 2021 World Health Organization classification of tumors of
the central nervous system. Cancer2022;128(1):47-58.
5.Yu
J, Shi Z, Lian Y, et al. Non-invasive IDH1 mutation estimation based on a
quantitative radiomics approach for grade II glioma. European Radiology2017;27(8):3509-3522.
6.Ding
H, Huang Y, Li Z, et al. Prediction of IDH status through MRI features and
enlightened reflection on the delineation of target volume in low-grade
gliomas. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment2019; 18:1180675708.
7.Yogananda
CGB, Shah BR, Yu FF, et al. A novel fully automated MRI-based deep
learning method for classification of IDH mutation status in brain gliomas.
Neuro-Oncology2019;22(3):402-411.
8.Fatania
K, Mohamud F, Clark A, et al. Intensity standardization of MRI prior to
radiomic feature extraction for artificial intelligence research in glioma—a
systematic review. European Radiology2022;32(10):7014-7025.
9.He
J, Ren J, Niu G, et al. Multi-parametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation
to predict biomarker status. BMC Medical Imaging2022;22(1):137.
10.Deng
D, Liao Y, Zhou J, et al. Non-invasive prediction of survival time of midline
glioma patients using machine learning on Multi-parametric MRI radiomics
features. Frontiers in Neurology2022;13:866274.