Wen Shi1, Dengrong Jiang2, Hannah Rando3, Shivalika Khanduja3, Zixuan Lin2, Kaisha Hazel2, George Pottanat2, Ebony Jones2, Cuimei Xu2, Doris D.M. Lin2, Sevil Yasar4, Sung-Min Cho5, and Hanzhang Lu1,2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 4Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 5Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Infectious disease, COVID-19
COVID-19 affects multiple organ systems in
the acute phase, however, limited knowledge is known about the long-term impact
on the brain following COVID-19 pneumonia, especially for those severe COVID-19
ICU survivors. Here, we used a water-extraction-with-phase-contrast-arterial-spin-tagging
(WEPCAST) MRI which can non-invasively measure BBB permeability to water. The
results showed significantly higher permeability-surface-area product (PS) in COVID-19
ICU survivors, which provided preliminary evidence that there was a BBB
breakdown in COVID-19 ICU survivors at 4 months after initial infection.
Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has caused
an unprecedented health crisis and increased morbidity and mortality1. Despite the extensive
characterization of COVID-19 in the acute phase, the long-term impact of
COVID-19 pneumonia on the brain is poorly understood2, especially for those who survived
the intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization. Prior studies reported
that severe COVID-19 infection resulted in long-term neurocognitive deficits3,4, including brain fog5, cognitive decline6, and other psychiatric
disorders7,8, suggesting damage to the
brain. Particularly, neuroinflammation is thought to be a major contributor to
brain abnormalities in long-COVID, yet blood-based biomarkers are likely contaminated
by systemic inflammations from COVID-19 pneumonia and acute respiratory
distress syndrome (ARDS), and thus, lack specificity. Blood-brain barrier
(BBB) breakdown, however, is a known hallmark of neuroinflammation and may represent
a more favorable alternative. Recently, a novel
technique, referred to as water-extraction-with-phase-contrast-arterial-spin-tagging
(WEPCAST) MRI, was developed to non-invasively measure BBB permeability to
water, without requiring
exogenous (gadolinium) contrast agents9,10. Herein, we used WEPCAST MRI
to assess BBB integrity in COVID-19 ICU survivors at approximately 4 months
after their initial infection. Correlations between neurophysiological measures
were also evaluated.Methods
Participants:
5 COVID-19 ICU survivors (45.8±20.4 yrs, 2M/3F, duration of ICU stay= 22.8±20.6
days) and 19 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (48.5±22.1 yrs, 7M/12F) were
recruited under IRB approval. The COVID-19 survivors were scanned at
approximately 4 months after their initial COVID-19 infection. Detailed demographic
information of the participants is summarized in Table 1.
Experiment:
All MRI scans were conducted on a Siemens 3T Prisma scanner (Siemens
Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) using a 32-channel head coil. The WEPCAST
technique probes BBB permeability to water by labeling the water molecules in
the incoming arteries and, by determining the fraction of the water that
remained in the vessel versus those exchanged into the brain tissue at the
capillary-tissue interface, one can obtain an estimation of the water
extraction fraction (E). The measurement is typically performed in the major
draining vein of the brain, e.g., superior sagittal sinus (SSS), yielding a
whole-brain measure of $$$E$$$. Representative
imaging and labeling positions are shown in Figure 1a. Additionally, global
cerebral blood flow (CBF), $$$f$$$, is
obtained by phase contrast (PC) velocity MRI and normalized by whole-brain
volume as measured on T1-MPRAGE11. Finally, the BBB permeability
index, referred to as permeability-surface-area product (PS), can be calculated
from $$$E$$$ and $$$f$$$ according to the Renkin-Crone Model: $$$PS=-ln(1-E)\cdot f$$$
Imaging
parameters: WEPCAST MRI9,10 was performed with the
following parameters: TR/TE=9200/9.5ms, FOV=200×200mm2, voxel size=3.1×3.1×10mm3,
labeling duration=4000ms, post-labeling delay=3000ms, VENC=20cm/s, GRAPPA=3. PC
velocity MRI was performed with the following parameters: TR/TE=25/8ms, FOV=200×200mm2,
voxel size=0.5×0.5×5mm3, VENC=60cm/s.
Statistical
analysis: CBF, E and PS values between the COVID-19 ICU survivors
and healthy controls were compared using linear regression in which the group assignment
was the independent variable, and age and sex were covariates. The association
between CBF and E was also evaluated by linear regression.Results
Figure 1b shows representative WEPCAST images
in a COVID-19 ICU survivor (72 yrs, M) and healthy control (75 yrs, M). It can
be observed that the WEPCAST signal in the COVID-19 ICU survivor (arrows) is
lower than that of the control.
Quantitative comparison of BBB permeability
is shown in Figure 2a. PS is significantly higher in COVID-19 ICU survivors
when compared to healthy controls (p = 0.019). In contrast, there was no
significant difference in CBF between the groups (p = 0.778, Figure 2b). Since
PS was calculated from CBF and E,
when CBF has no group difference, it is expected that E would show a difference. Indeed, we found that COVID-19 ICU
survivors had a larger E (p = 0.056,
Figure 2c) when compared to the control group.
To further elucidate the reason that PS had a
greater sensitivity than E in detecting the group differences, we studied the
relationship between CBF and E. Figure 3 displays the scatter plot between CBF
and E in which a significant inverse relationship was observed ($$$β$$$ = -0.0032, p = 0.0008). Therefore,
it appears that CBF and E both
contained physiological noises (normal variation) that are correlated with each
other, and when computing PS. These noises/variations were reduced/canceled out
and resulted in high sensitivity in detecting subtle BBB breakdown using PS.Discussion and conclusion
The present
study used a noninvasive WEPCAST MRI technique to measure whole-brain BBB permeability
to water in COVID-19 ICU survivors. A higher PS value was observed, suggesting a
BBB breakdown in severe COVID-19 ARDS patients. These findings are consistent
with the notion of neuroinflammation secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection4,12.
Since CBF was
not different between COVID-19 patients and healthy controls, measurement of E should
be sufficient to prove BBB disruption in COVID-19 patients. However, based
on the observation in Figure 3, we speculate that the additional measure of
CBF could allow higher sensitivity in detecting abnormal BBB permeability.
In summary, this
study provided preliminary evidence that there was a BBB breakdown in COVID-19 ICU survivors at 4 months after initial
infection, suggesting a long-term adverse effect of COVID-19 on the
brain. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track
COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20(5):533–534.
2. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A,
et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat. Med. 2021;27(4):601–615.
3. Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, et
al. Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N. Engl. J. Med.
2020;382(23):2268–2270.
4. Romero-Sánchez CM, Díaz-Maroto I,
Fernández-Díaz E, et al. Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients
with COVID-19: The ALBACOVID registry. Neurology 2020;95(8):E1060–E1070.
5. Hugon J, Msika E-F, Queneau M,
Farid K, Paquet C. Long COVID: cognitive complaints (brain fog) and dysfunction
of the cingulate cortex. J. Neurol. 2022;269(1):44–46.
6. Douaud G, Lee S, Alfaro-Almagro F,
et al. SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank.
Nature 2022;604(7907):697–707.
7. Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu
X. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a
cohort study. Lancet 2021;397(10270):220–232.
8. Premraj L, Kannapadi N V, Briggs
J, et al. Mid and long-term neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of
post-COVID-19 syndrome: A meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2022;434:120162.
9. Lin Z, Li Y, Su P, et al.
Non-contrast MR imaging of blood-brain barrier permeability to water. Magn.
Reson. Med. 2018;80(4):1507–1520.
10. Lin Z, Jiang D, Liu D, et al.
Noncontrast assessment of blood–brain barrier permeability to water: Shorter
acquisition, test–retest reproducibility, and comparison with contrast-based
method. Magn. Reson. Med. 2021;86(1):143–156.
11. Aslan S, Xu F, Wang PL, et al.
Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling.
Magn. Reson. Med. 2010;63(3):765–771.
12. Alexopoulos H, Magira E, Bitzogli
K, et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the CSF, blood-brain barrier
dysfunction, and neurological outcome: Studies in 8 stuporous and comatose
patients. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. neuroinflammation 2020;7(6):4–8.