Amaresha Shridhar Konar1, Jaemin Shin2, Ramesh Paudyal1, Akash Deelip Shah3, Abhay Dave4, Maggie Fung2, Eve LoCastro1, Suchandrima Banerjee5, Nancy Lee6, and Amita Shukla-Dave1,3
1Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, United States, 2GE Healthcare, New York City, NY, United States, 3Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, United States, 4Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York City, NY, United States, 5GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, CA, United States, 6Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence
A Deep
learning (DL)-based reconstruction is a promising method to
achieve higher resolution for diffusion-weighted Kurtosis imaging (DKI) without
increasing signal averaging. The DKI phantom and patient
results demonstrated improved image quality and reduced Gibbs (ringing)
artifact, aiding in the robust estimation of D
app
and K
app. In all phantom and patient data, the standard deviation of D
app and K
app measured in images reconstructed without DL was higher than in
images reconstructed using DL. The NEX=1 significantly reduced the multi-b-value data acquisition time,
and the DL-based reconstruction can produce images comparable to the standard
NEX=2 or 4, depending on the b-value.
Purpose:
Non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis
imaging (DKI) measures quantitative metrics describing the water diffusivity of
hindered and restricted water molecules and tissue microstructure1,2. For
extra-cranial regions such as the head and neck (HN), multi-b-value data
acquisition is challenging, particularly at higher b-value with a reduced number
of excitations, to maintain the optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required
for DKI analysis2,3. A
linear fit to the natural logarithm of the multiple b-value data with DKI
modeling yields the apparent diffusion (Dapp) and kurtosis
coefficient (Kapp), which are the surrogate markers of the tumor
cellularity and tissue microstructure2. A recently developed novel deep
learning (DL)-based MR reconstruction method (AIRTM Recon DL) has enhanced
the image signal noise ratio (SNR), sharpness, and reduced truncation artifacts
in prostate cancer patients4-6. Tumors in the HN region include a
diverse group of cancers, and the accurate measurement of quantitative metrics may
improve treatment response assessment for such tumors7-9. This study investigates whether DL-based
reconstruction can improve the quantification of DKI metrics for tumors in the HN
region.Methods:
MRI Data Acquisition: Data were acquired on a 3T MRI scanner
(SIGNA Premier, GE Healthcare) using a 21-channel HN unit.
Phantom: The novel, multi-exponential DKI phantom used in
this study has two tiers of seven 20ml-glass scintillation vials containing
lamellar vesicle (LV) solutions placed in a 1L jar filled with deionized water
(Figure 2)10,11. The LV materials were made from
fatty alcohols, surfactants, and water (solid-in-water %(w/w)=0.5%-2.5%). Two
polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) at 20% and 40% were added as Gaussian-diffusion (Kapp=0)
“controls.” The phantom contained an alcohol thermometer for temperature (T)
reading to ±0.5°C. The phantoms were left to thermolyze in scanner rooms
overnight before scanning, and the temperature during the exam was 19°C. The multi b-value
DW images were acquired using a single shot spin echo planar imaging (SS-SE-EPI)
sequence with TR/TE=4000/66 (minimum) ms, the field of view (FOV)=20 cm,
matrix=128×128, slices=15, slice thickness=5mm, and b=0,20,50,80,200,300,500,1000,1500,2000
s/mm2. Two sets of data acquisition were performed using the above
parameters with modification in the number of
excitations (NEX): 1) Using the standard NEX=2 for b≤300 and NEX=4 for b≥500,
and 2) Reducing the NEX=1 for all the b-values. The total scan time with the
standard NEX was 6.12 min and for reduced NEX=1 was 2.13 min.
Patients: DW-MRI data were acquired from
six HN cancer patients (median age 59 years, six males, 2 HPV(+) positive, 1
HPV(-), and 3 with unknown primary tumor status) in this retrospective study
between December 2021 and June 2022. These patients underwent chemo-radiation
therapy (CRT), and all MRI examinations were performed before treatment. MRI
protocol consisted of multi-planar T1/T2 weighted imaging
followed by multi-b-value DWI (b-values same as mentioned above) with
TR/TE=4000/80 (minimum) ms, the field of view (FOV)=20-24 cm, matrix=128×128,
slices=8-10, slice thickness=5 mm, number of excitation (NEX)=2 and
b=0,20,50,80,200,300,500,1000,1500,2000 s/mm2. The raw data
from the DW-MRI scans were transferred and retro-reconstructed using the AIRTM
Recon DL algorithm in the GE reconstruction pipeline (Orchestra SDK, GE
Healthcare) and finally labeled as DL images 4,5.
ROI Contouring and DWI Data Analysis: Regions of Interest (ROIs) were delineated
on the primary tumors and neck nodal metastases by an experienced neuro-radiologist
on both DW images with and without DL (b = 0 s/mm2) using ITK-SNAP.
All DW data analysis was performed using in-house software, MRI-QAMPER (Quantitative
Analysis Multi-Parametric Evaluation Routines), written in MATLAB (MathWorks,
Natick, MA). ROI
analysis yielded mean and standard deviation (STD) for each reported metric. Coefficient
of variation (CV) and relative percent of difference reported. Results:
The DL-based reconstructed images obtained from the
DKI phantom showed reduced Gibbs (ringing) artifacts and increased image
sharpness (Figure 1). Figure 2 exhibits the Dapp and Kapp
maps for the standard and reduced NEX images reconstructed with and without DL
for the DKI phantom. Dapp demonstrated no significant difference
between the standard and reduced NEX images reconstructed using DL, while Kapp
has shown a difference between the two acquisition and reconstruction
strategies, particularly for vials #1, #6, and #7. The result of this
comparison in the DKI phantom can be observed in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows data from
a representative patient with primary tumor and neck nodal metastases. The improved
SNR and reduced artifacts can be observed in the patient data, similar to
phantom results (Figure 4). Table 1 summarizes the mean and CV of Dapp
and Kapp in 10 ROIs for images with and without DL. For mean Dapp,
a maximum difference of 5.22% was observed between the metrics derived from the
images with and without DL, and for the mean Kapp, a maximum difference
of 11.36% was observed between these two sets of images. Discussion and Conclusion:
The DL-based image
reconstruction improved DKI image quality with increased sharpness and reduced
Gibbs (ringing) artifacts. In all phantom and patient data, the STDs of Dapp
and Kapp measured in images reconstructed without DL were higher than
in images reconstructed using DL. Particularly at higher b-values, the DL-based
image reconstruction improved image quality, reducing bias in estimated Dapp
and Kapp. The NEX=1 significantly reduced the multi-b-value
data acquisition time, and the DL-based reconstruction can produce images
comparable to the standard NEX=2 or 4, depending on the b-value.Acknowledgements
Funding support from
National Institutes of Health Grant: U01 CA211205 (ASD)References
- Jensen JH, Helpern JA. MRI
quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed. Aug 2010;23(7):698-710.
doi:10.1002/nbm.1518
- Jansen JF, Stambuk HE, Koutcher JA,
Shukla-Dave A. Non-gaussian analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in head
and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Apr 2010;31(4):741-8. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1919
- Solomon E, Lemberskiy G, Baete S, et
al. Time-dependent diffusivity and kurtosis in phantoms and patients with head
and neck cancer. Magn Reson Med. Oct
11 2022;doi:10.1002/mrm.29457
- Lebel RM. Performance
characterization of a novel deep learning-based MR image reconstruction
pipeline. arXiv preprint arXiv:200806559.
2020;
- Choi M, Figee M, Lebel R, et al.
Evaluation of the efficacy of a Deep Learning-based Reconstruction in the
Connectomic Deep Brain Stimulation. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 30
(2022); 2022:3357.
- Ueda T, Ohno Y, Yamamoto K, et al.
Deep Learning Reconstruction of Diffusion-weighted MRI Improves Image Quality
for Prostatic Imaging. Radiology.
2022;303(2):373-381.
- Tshering Vogel DW, Thoeny HC.
Cross-sectional imaging in cancers of the head and neck: how we review and
report. Cancer Imaging.
2016;16(1):1-15.
- Paudyal R, Konar AS, Obuchowski NA,
et al. Repeatability of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Metrics in
Phantoms, Head-and-Neck and Thyroid Cancers: Preliminary Findings. Tomography. Mar 2019;5(1):15-25.
doi:10.18383/j.tom.2018.00044
- Riaz N, Sherman E, Pei X, et al.
Precision Radiotherapy: Reduction in Radiation for Oropharyngeal Cancer in the
30 ROC Trial. JNCI: Journal of the
National Cancer Institute. 2021;113(6):742-751. doi:10.1093/jnci/djaa184
10. D. Malyarenko TC, S. Ono, T. Lynch, S.
Swanson. Temperature and Concentration Dependence of Diffusion Kurtosis
Parameters in a Quantitative Phantom. 2022:2429.
11. Solomon
E, Lemberskiy G, Baete S, et al. Time‐dependent diffusivity and kurtosis in
phantoms and patients with head and neck cancer. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2022;