Gregory Peng1, Can Wu2, Jafari Ramin3, Yansong Zhao3, and Qi Peng1
1Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States, 2Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 3Philips Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Quantitative Imaging, T1rho dispersion imaging
T1ρ dispersion
imaging based on repeated T1ρ measurements at multiple spin-lock frequencies allows characterization of different dynamic processes of
tissues. The clinical potential of these techniques is, however, limited by the
total scan time needed to obtain reliable and consistent quantitative
measurements. In this abstract, we propose the
application of a 4D dynamic sequence with radial acquisitions in combination
with an accelerated data-point sampling strategy to achieve efficient
coverage of the high-dimensional data space in T1rho dispersion MRI, which
leads to high-resolution 3D T1rho dispersion imaging acquired within clinically acceptable scan
duration of ~5 minutes.
Introduction
The spin-lattice relaxation time in
the rotating frame (T1ρ, and the relaxation rate R1ρ = 1/T1ρ) measured from a few spin-lock time (TSL) at a single
spin-lock frequency (FSL, e.g., 500Hz), has been shown to be sensitive to
tissue abnormalities. How T1ρ varies as a function of FSL (T1ρ
dispersion) additionally illustrates the functional and dynamic properties of
tissue [1-3]. However, T1ρ dispersion imaging sequences demand long acquisition
time, since multiple data-point acquisitions to cover both TSL-FSL directions
are needed. A few fast-imaging approaches have been proposed recently for
high-resolution 3D T1ρ dispersion imaging, dramatically reducing scan time [4-6].
However, there has been no study on optimization of data-point sampling in the
FSL-TSL space for accelerated imaging. In this work, we propose the application
of 4D radial acquisitions with accelerated sampling strategy for high-spatial
resolution 3D T1ρ dispersion MRI, leading to feasible scan duration in the
clinical setting. Accelerated Sampling Strategy
4D contrast-enhanced dynamic imaging sequences are among the
most important sequences in the clinical environment to obtain high temporospatial resolution imaging to best delineate the contrast-enhancing
dynamics in tissues post-injection. These sequences are typically vastly under-sampled
for fast imaging, optimized based on the expected signal evolution along the time
dimension. To allow faster imaging with minimal signal distortion during T1ρ dispersion
imaging, we propose
the data-point sampling strategy as shown in Figure. 1. The sampling order of
data-points (red arrows) in the TSL-FSL sampling space has been optimized to
minimize signal change along the data acquisition train. We applied the
strategy in a vender-specific dynamic 4D radial acquisition sequence (Philips 4D
Freebreathing, termed “4DVane” herein), leading to an accelerated sequence
termed “Fast 4DVane” herein.Imaging and Processing Methods
The basic T1ρ
dispersion imaging sequence is based on an unpaired PC MAPSS sequence in
combination with T1ρ preparations at different TSLs and FSLs, as presented
previously [4,6]. Three pulse sequences were compared in this work. The first
applies traditional Cartesian readout in combination with compressed sensing
reconstruction, termed “Cartesian” method herein. The second method uses 4DVane
sequence with full data sampling along the FSL-TSL directions. The third sequence
is Fast 4DVane with view-sharing along the FSL direction as shown in Figure. 1.
All imaging experiments were performed on a 3T Philips Ingenia MR scanner with
a 1ch-TX/16ch-Rx knee coil. Axial
3D volumetric acquisitions had the following scan parameters: FOV=140/140/180mm3,
acquisition voxel size=1×1×4mm3, TR/TE=5.4/2.6ms, recovery delay
time=1s, and GRE readout train length=96 with centric profile ordering [5]. Compressed
SENSE factor was 3 for the “Cartesian” method, and SENSE factor was 1.3 along Kz-direction
for the two 4DVane sequences. The same sequences were tested both on a plant phantom
(sweet potato+orange) and in vivo on calf muscles of a healthy volunteer. All sequences were performed
with 10 FSLs from 0 to 900Hz (100Hz gap) and 3 TSLs (0+, 25+, 35- ms), where ± represents
positive/negative phase cycling. The total scan durations for the Cartesian,
4DVane, and fast 4DVane sequences were 9:00, 9:25, and 5:22 min, respectively. T1ρ
maps at different FSLs were iteratively reconstructed voxel-by-voxel using
a mono-exponential signal model using complex data as described in [6]. Results
All three methods (Cartesian, 4DVane, and Fast
4DVane) generated high-spatial resolution T1ρ dispersion imaging in both the
plant phantom and human studies. Figure 2 shows the comparison between T1ρ maps
at different FSLs of the plant phantom. There is little difference between the T1ρ
maps from the sweet potato. T1ρ values have the same trend in all sequences but
larger differences for the orange due to its much larger T1ρ values than the designed
range of measurement. Figure 3 shows the results from calf muscles at different
FSLs. There is little difference between the T1ρ maps, and all sequences had
the same upward trend at higher FSL. Figure 4 shows the quantitative results of
R1ρ and the R1ρ dispersion curves of the average R1ρ from ROIs on the sweet potato.
The R1ρ dispersion curves are highly consistent among all methods, despite the
R1ρ values varied much larger than typical in physiological tissues. Human muscle
results (not shown) also had similar consistency with much less R1ρ variability at
different FSLs. Discussions
T1ρ dispersion imaging based
on T1ρ measurements at multiple FSLs allows
characterization of different dynamic processes of tissues. The clinical
potential of T1ρ dispersion imaging is, however, limited by the long scan time
needed for reliable and consistent measurements with 3D volume coverage. To
reduce total imaging time, we propose the application of a dynamic 4D sequence
with radial acquisitions for accelerated T1ρ dispersion imaging. We
additionally applied an optimized data-point sampling strategy to minimize
expected signal change along the data acquisition train, which allows more
aggressive view sharing. We demonstrated the
feasibility of this approach using the state-of-the-art fast MAPSS sequence [4]
on both the plant phantom and human studies to achieve high-quality 3D T1ρ
dispersion imaging at ~5min with 10 FSLs and three TSLs. Further scan
time reduction may be achieved by applying compressed sensing reconstruction in
the Fast 4DVane sequence. Model- or AI-based reconstruction methods, which
generate the T1ρ dispersion curve directly, potentially only need a fraction of
the data acquired here. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Cobb JG, Xie J, Gore JC. Contributions of chemical
and diffusive exchange to T1rho dispersion. Magn Reson Med.
2013;69(5):1357-1366.
2. Koskinen SK, Virta AM, Niemi PT, et al. T1rho
dispersion of rat tissues in vitro. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;17(7):1043-1047.
3. Wang P, Block J, Gore JC. Chemical exchange in knee
cartilage assessed by R1rho (1/T1rho) dispersion at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging.
2015;33(1):38-42.
4. Peng Q, Wu C, Kim J, Li X. Efficient phase-cycling
strategy for high-resolution 3D gradient-echo quantitative parameter mapping. NMR
Biomed 2022; 35(7): e4700.
5.
Peng Q, Wu C. Fast 3D T1rho Dispersion MRI with Interleaved Phase Cycling
MAPSS, Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 30, London, 2022.
6.
Peng Q, Peng GW, Wu C. Integrated T1rho Dispersion Imaging and Quantification,
Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 30, London, 2022.
7. Peng GW, Wu C, Peng Q. Improved Phase-cycling
Preparations in Quantitative T1rho Mapping, Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 30,
London, 2022.