Olivier E Mougin1, Paul Glover1, Richard Bowtell1, and Penny A Gowland1
1SPMIC, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Keywords: Low-Field MRI, Gradients
Open magnet provide advantageous facility for imaging the human body in
a natural way. However field inhomogeneities can reduce the utilisable imaging field-of-view.
We present a simple way to map the static field inhomogeneity and the non-linear
gradient inhomogeneity in order to correct them during the image reconstruction.
Introduction
Open MRI scanners provide opportunities to study human physiology in a
more natural way than in standard cylindrical-bore systems. However, the static
field produced by an open magnet is more inhomogeneous than that of a
cylindrical magnet, leading to image distortions and even some loss in signal. Furthermore, open scanners must
use bi-planar gradient coils for spatial encoding, which generally provide reduced performance
in terms of achievable gradient amplitude, switching rate and linearity.
Interaction with the proximal iron pole pieces of the magnet can also produce
spatiotemporal distortion of gradient waveforms. These result in spatial and
potentially, temporal inhomogeneities of the magnetic fields, causing deviations
from the desired k-space trajectory during imaging. The resulting performance
is sufficient for slow imaging of static objects, but hampers rapid imaging of
dynamic processes, for which the upright geometry is particularly valuable. Hardware
and reconstruction development makes it possible to monitor the magnetic field
using field probes1, as well as using image
specific phantoms2,3. The correct k-space
trajectory can thus be used to correct the sampled acquisition for
reconstruction based on the subject position regarding the gradient fields at
the time of the acquisition4,5. We propose to evaluate the magnetic field affected by
temporal gradient non-linearity (GNL) within a typical field of view (FOV)
required for body imaging using a purposed-made phantom with a known ground
truth. Using a reversed-gradient sequence and a non-linear registration
algorithm, we estimated the static magnetic field and gradient distortion in an
open scanner.Methods
Data
were acquired on a 0.5T ASG-Paramed MROpen scanner, using a 4-channel receiver
spinal coil. A tray made of two sheets of Plexiglas with laser-cut holes
equally sampled every 25mm was fixed on the bed of the MRI scanner. A total of
104 spheres of 10mm diameter were filled with pure water and arranged on the tray
to cover a surface of 250x250mm2. A few positions were left
empty to allow pattern recognition. The imaging sequence was a 3D Gradient echo
sequence (TE/TR=5/12.4ms, FA=10o, FOV=500x500x100mm and isotropic
voxels of 2.5mm3,total of 40 slices), with a bandwidth readout=27.5kHz
(scan time=5min per direction). The planning was specified to have the centre
of the FOV at the magnet/gradient isocentre, with the possibility to reverse the
readout gradient direction. Images with the readout gradient in the +z and -z
directions were acquired and retrospectively registered using the non-linear
registration algorithm fnirt6 to obtain a map of the static field
inhomogeneities. Subsequently the corrected image was registered using fnirt to
a ground truth image based on the known phantom geometry created using ITK-snap7. The obtained field warp was then fitted at the centre of each
sphere using a 3rd degree polynomial surface before being
extrapolated to the whole FOV using matlab. The resulting map was then scaled
to show the measured ball position in mm in each Cartesian direction. In a
separate experiment, 4 field probes8 were used to monitor the time-course
of the z-gradient in a pulse-acquire sequence where the gradient pulse of
interest Gz was shifted through the acquisition window. The duration of the
gradient was 5ms with a rise time of 0.6ms for an amplitude of 4mT/m (20% of
maximum gradient strength) and the acquisition window was 11ms (TR=50ms), for a total number of acquisitions of 12890 (Number of signal averages
= 10). The derivative of the phase of the FID signal was computed to extract
the frequency, and therefore the magnetic field strength at a point. A
pointwise moving overlap averaging was used and the profile subsequently
filtered with a cut-off of 6 kHz. The field probes were positioned at 0mm,
+60mm, +120mm and -120mm from the isocentre of the magnet in the z-direction. Results
The gradient reversal in the z direction allowed effective correction of
the distortion due to static field inhomogeneities, as shown in the Figure 1. From
a generated image of spheres on the reference grid (Figure 2a), it was possible
to estimate the resulting gradient distortions in the three Cartesian
directions, as shown with the contour plots of the Figure 3. The temporal characteristics
of the gradients were measured using fields probes and show good SNR with the
expected polygon shape requested in the sequence, as shown in figure 4. Discussion
A non-linear registration algorithm was used to estimate the displacement of the various spheres
both due to static magnetic field inhomogeneity and gradient non-linearity. The
registration could be improved to provide better precision in the estimated displacement,
but it would have little influence on the resulting low-varying gradient
variation that could be observed on the figure 3. However, it was still
possible to record distortion of up to ±10mm in a FOV=500mm. The gradient waveforms conformed well to the expected waveforms and showed no detectable change in shape across the FOV. The measured maps and gradient waveforms will be incorporated into a model-based
reconstruction and solved iteratively as described in4 to improve
the spatial resolution and FOV coverage at 0.5T.Conclusion
Gradient non-linearity was
mapped successfully using a grid-like phantom and image registration algorithm after
correcting for the effects of the B0 inhomogeneity using a gradient reversal
sequence on a 0.5T Upright Open scanner. Acknowledgements
This
research was supported but the EPSRC Grant EP/V025856/1.References
[1]: de Zanche, N., Barmet, C.,
Nordmeyer-Massner, J. A., & Pruessmann, K. P. (2008). NMR Probes for
measuring magnetic fields and field dynamics in MR systems. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, 60(1), 176–186.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21624
[2]: Malyarenko, D. I., &
Chenevert, T. L. (2014). Practical estimate of gradient nonlinearity for
implementation of ADC bias correction. J Magn Reson Imaging, 40(6),
1487–1495.
[3]: Tao, S., Trzasko, J. D.,
Gunter, J. L., Weavers, P. T., Shu, Y., Huston, J., Lee, S. K., Tan, E. T.,
& Bernstein, M. A. (2017). Gradient nonlinearity calibration and
correction for a compact, asymmetric magnetic resonance imaging gradient
system. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 62(2), N18–N31.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa524f
[4]: Tao, S., Trzasko, J. D.,
Shu, Y., Huston, J., & Bernstein, M. A. (2015). Integrated image
reconstruction and gradient nonlinearity correction. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, 74(4), 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25487
[5]: Wilm, B. J., Barmet, C.,
Pavan, M., & Pruessmann, K. P. (2011). Higher order reconstruction for MRI
in the presence of spatiotemporal field perturbations. Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine, 65(6), 1690–1701. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22767
[6]: Andersson JLR, Jenkinson M, & Smith S. (2010). Non-linear registration, aka spatial normalisation.
[7]: Yushkevich, P. A., Piven,
J., Hazlett, H. C., Smith, R. G., Ho, S., Gee, J. C., & Gerig, G. (2006).
User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures:
Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage, 31(3),
1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015
[8]: Mistry, D., Gowland, P., Mougin, O., Bowtell, R., & Glover, P. (2022). Characterising the Magnetic Field Inhomogeneity for Open MRI at 0.5T using a Screened Coil NMR Probe Design. Proceedings of 31st ISMRM Conference, 1204. https://archive.ismrm.org/2022/1204.html