Bing LIU1,2, Linwei Zhang3, Aocai Yang1, Jixin Luan1, Kuan Lv1, and Guolin Ma1
1Department of Radiology, China Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China, 2Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, 3Department of Neurology, China Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Neurodegeneration, Brain Connectivity, functional MRI, independent component analysis, spinocerebellar ataxia type 3, large-scale brain networks, functional connectivity
Large-scale
resting-state functional network connectivity changes in spinocerebellar ataxia
type 3 patients were found in both inter- and intranetwork functional
connectivity. Especially, the increased intranetwork functional connectivity
within the lateral visual network may potentially be a compensatory mechanism
of visual-related symptoms in SCA3.
Introduction
As a neurodegenerative disease, the spinocerebellar
ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is the most common autosomal dominant ataxia subtype with
slowly progressive degenerative disorders that affects brain functions. Functional
networks can be automatically identified by independent component analysis
(ICA) of resting-state fMRI data which can discriminate temporal correlations
among brain regions at rest1. Examinations of functional connectivity
between and within functional networks could improve our understanding of the
large-scale brain functional organization2. This study aimed to investigate
the abnormal inter- and intranetwork functional connectivity in patients with SCA3.Methods
Seventeen
SCA3 patients (14 males and 3 females; mean age, 42.8±11.9 years) and 17 age-, sex-matched healthy controls (HC) (13
males and 4 females; mean age, 42.8±15.0 years) were
prospectively recruited into this study. MR data of all subjects were acquired
by using a 3.0T scanner (GE, Discovery MR750, Milwaukee, United States)
with an 8-channel head coil.
Independent
component analysis (ICA) was conducted to parcellate the preprocessed fMRI data
with the GIFT toolbox (http://mialab.mrn.org/software/gift/), and the number of
independent components (N=50) was estimated automatically by the software. To
ensure estimation stability, the infomax algorithm was repeated 50 times in
ICASSO (http://research.ics.tkk.fi/ica/icasso/), and the most central run was
selected and analyzed further. Finally, participant-specific spatial maps and
time courses were obtained using the GICA back reconstruction approach.
Based
on a previous study3, we identified several independent components as
functional networks that had peak activations in gray matter; showed low
spatial overlap with known vascular, ventricular, motion, and susceptibility
artifacts; and exhibited primarily low frequency power. This selection
procedure resulted in 10 functional networks: medial, posterior and lateral visual networks (mVN, pVN and lVN); default mode network (DMN);
cerebellum network (CN); sensorimotor network (SMN); auditory network (AN);
executive control network (ECN); right and left frontoparietal networks (rFPN
and lFPN).
Before
internetwork functional connectivity calculation, the following additional
postprocessing steps were performed on the time courses of selected functional
networks4: (1) detrending linear, quadratic, and cubic trends; (2) despiking
detected outliers; and (3) lowpass filtering with a cut-off frequency of 0.15
Hz. Then, internetwork functional connectivity was estimated as the Pearson
correlation coefficients between pairs of time courses of the functional
networks, resulting in a symmetric 10× 10 correlation matrix for each subject. Finally,
correlations were transformed to z-scores using Fisher's transformation to
improve the normality. Intranetwork connectivity was examined via the spatial
maps, indexing the contribution of the time course to each voxel comprising a
given component. Specifically, all participants’ spatial maps for each
functional network were entered into a random-effect one-sample t-test. Brain
regions were considered to be within each network if they met a height
threshold of P<0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons using a family-wise
error (FWE) and an extent threshold of 100 voxels. Two sample t-test based on
MATLAB (R2013b) and SPM12 was used in exploring the intranetwork connectivity
differences within each network between groups, with FWE multiple comparison corrections at voxel-level P
< 0.05.Results
Spatial
maps of 10 selected independent components out of the 50 independent components
resulted in 10 functional networks (Figure 1). Pairwise correlation patterns
between functional networks are illustrated in Figure 2. Both positive and
negative internetwork functional connectivity was observed. Voxel-wise
analyses of the spatial maps demonstrated significant group differences in
intranetwork functional connectivity within lVN. Figure 3 and Table 2 show detailed
significant brain regions in SCA3>HC comparison in voxel-wise intranetwork connectivity
of lVN. In Fusiform_R&L, Lingual_R&L, Cerebelum_6_R&L and several
occipital and temporal regions, the intranetwork functional connectivity of
SCA3 patients in lVN increased compared to that of HC.Discussion & Conclusion
Across
all subjects in this study, the negative internetwork functional connectivity
is mainly between CN and ECN. On the contrary, the positive internetwork functional
connectivity is mainly between the three visual networks (mVN, pVN and lVN) and
between SMN and AN. Given that the cognition-space paradigm corresponds to the lateral
visual maps3, the increased intranetwork functional connectivity within the lateral
visual network in our SCA3 patients may potentially be a compensatory mechanism
of their visual-related symptoms such as oculomotor deficits. Therefore, our findings
of the presence of modiļ¬cations and alterations of several large-scale inter-
and intranetwork functional connectivity might expand existing knowledge regarding
visual function changes in SCA3 patients.References
1.
van de Ven VG, Formisano E, Prvulovic D, Roeder CH, Linden DE. Functional
connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI
measurements during rest. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Jul;22(3):165-78.
2.
Buckner RL, Vincent JL. Unrest at rest: default activity and spontaneous
network correlations. Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1091-6; discussion 1097-9.
3.
Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL, Glahn DC, Fox PM, Mackay CE, Filippini N, Watkins
KE, Toro R, Laird AR, Beckmann CF. Correspondence of the brain's functional
architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug
4;106(31):13040-5.
4.
Cai H, Wang C, Qian Y, Zhang S, Zhang C, Zhao W, Zhang T, Zhang B, Chen J, Liu
S, Zhu J, Yu Y. Large-scale functional network connectivity mediate the
associations of gut microbiota with sleep quality and executive functions. Hum
Brain Mapp. 2021 Jul;42(10):3088-3101.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
No reference found.