Yu Fu1, Jiayi Gao1, Mingyang Li1, and Huimao Zhang1
1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Cancer, Muscle
The low-risk rectal cancer (RC) has no need for postoperative
treatment after total mesorectal excision (TME). However, there are some
low-risk RC patients without postoperative-treatments had subsequent metastasis
and recurrence. Skeletal muscles are gaining more attention which shown to be
associated with morbidity and mortality in caners. Therefore, this study
established a radiomics model based on pelvic skeletal muscles on MRI to
identify the low-risk rectal cancer (RC) with poor prognosis. Our research
shows that the novel radiomic signatures could be used to predict disease-free
survival (DFS) in low-risk RC to help clinicians improve the treatment decision
making followed TME.
Introduction
The
low-risk rectal cancer (RC) has no need for postoperative treatment after total mesorectal excision
(TME), which is defined as pT1–pT3a/b, N0, MRF clear, lymphovascular invasion negative
(LVI-) and perineural invasion negative (PNI-) by the postoperative
histopathology.1 However, there are some low-risk RC patients
without postoperative-treatments had subsequent metastasis and recurrence. Therefore,
how to identify the patients of low-risk RC with poor prognosis is very
important to make the follow-up treatment plan after TME. Recently, as part of
body composition, skeletal muscles are gaining more attention which shown to be
associated with morbidity and mortality in caners and following abdominal
surgery.2,3 MRI is recommended
for RC staging, and pelvic muscles can be clearly shown1,4, however, it is difficult
for radiologists to find potential quantitative characteristics of muscles in
images. Currently,
radiomics5 may improve the accuracy of diagnosis,
prognosis and prediction by extracting and analyzing the first-order and
high-order image features of medical images. Therefore, the purpose of this
study was to build a radiomics model using skeletal
muscles based on MRI
to predict disease-free
survival (DFS) , so as to differentiate the underlying poor
outcome patient in low-risk RC.Methods
Study Population: A total of 99 postoperative
histopathological proved RC (allocated to a training and testing set with a 7:3
ratio) with low risk factors (cT1–cT3a/b, N0, MRF clear, no EMVI, no LVI and PNI)
were recruited in our study. All patients underwent MR examination preoperatively,
had no postoperative-treatments followed by TME, and followed up 2-6 years. Our
institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the
requirement for informed consent.
MRI Acquisition: MRI examinations were
performed with a 3.0-T system (uMR780; Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co.,
Ltd.) with phased-array surface coils. 2D fast spin-echo (FSE) T2WI was
performed in coronal planes, repetition time 4900 ms, echo time 153.72 ms,
slice thickness 4 mm, gap 0.4 mm, field of view 320x320 mm2, refocus
flip angle 90.
Annotation: Two gastrointestinal
radiologists (G.J. and F.Y., with 5 and 11 years of experience in rectal MRI,
respectively) annotated the area of interests (ROIs) together. When opinions were
consistent, the label would be output. ITK-SNAP software (version 3.6,
www.itk-snap. org) was used for manual segmentation of 2D MR images, and the
muscles were delineated layer by layer on the coronal T2WI sequence, including
bilateral piriformis, obturator internus and perianal complex. (Figure.1)
Statistical Analysis: Statistical Analysis:
Total 33 radiomic signatures based on 1257 3D features was generated using the
least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model by
5 folds cross validation. Then 8 radiomic signatures with p value less than 0.1
were selected by Cox single factor. Finally, 3 radiomic signatures with p value
less than 0.05 were selected by Cox multi factor analysis. (Figure.2) The
Cox-score is obtained by the coefficient of the Cox model and the value of
radiomic signatures. The Cox-score with DFS was investigated by Kaplan-Meier
survival curves. Survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. One model
was built and assessed for their predictive values, using the Harrell
concordance index.Results
The Cox-score stratified patients into
low- and high-risk groups for DFS in the training set (P = 0.006), and was
successfully validated in the testing set (P =0.031). The model with 3 radiomic
signatures had good performance in training set (C index=0.776, 95% confidence
interval [CI] 0.598-0.914) and testing set (C index=0.753, 95% confidence
interval [CI] 0.591-0.939). (Figure.3) The calibration curves
depicted consistency between the predicted and observed outcomes.
(Figure.4)Discussion
In
agreement with existing publications based on muscles,6 we successfully established a radiomics model
using pelvic muscles to predict DFS in low-risk RC, which demonstrated that the
model could be used to differentiated the poor prognosis patients. The above objectively
results would help clinicians to screen the bad outcome patients and ultimately
improve the treatment decision making followed TME. Muscle is the distinct entity
from other markers of physiological reserve, which is a considered marker of
overall health. And in our study, we found 3 radiomic signatures of pelvic muscles associated with poor
prognosis, which maybe new biomarkers to make a novel risk stratification for RC.
However, our data is biased, which is consistent with clinical reality. Further,
we will increase the sample size, hoping to build a more robust and generalized
model.Conclusion
The novel radiomic
signatures could be used to predict DFS in patients with low-risk RC. The radiomic model has the ability to estimate DFS (P=0.006, 0.031 in
training set and in validation set, respectively), and may help guide
individualized treatment in such patients.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgements found.References
1. Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E,
et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis,
treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European
Society for Medical Oncology 2017;28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40.
2. Lee CM, Kang J.
Prognostic impact of myosteatosis in patients with colorectal cancer: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
2020;11(5):1270-1282.
3. Weerink LBM, van
der Hoorn A, van Leeuwen BL, de Bock GH. Low skeletal muscle mass and
postoperative morbidity in surgical oncology: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle 2020;11(3):636-649.
4. Benson AB, Venook
AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Rectal Cancer, Version
6.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020;18(7):806-815.
5. Lambin P,
Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, Aerts HJWL. Radiomics: Extracting
more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. European
Journal of Cancer 2012;43(4):441-446.
6. Body S, Ligthart
MAP, Rahman S, et al. Sarcopenia and Myosteatosis Predict Adverse Outcomes
After Emergency Laparotomy A Multi-center Observational Cohort Study. Annals of
Surgery 2022;275(6):1103-1111.