Arya A Suprana1,2, Jiyo S Athertya2, Justin Chen2, Zijin Yang2, James Lo1,2, Xiaojun Chen2, Saeed Jerban2, and Jiang Du1,2,3
1Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States, 2Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States, 3Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Bone
Recent developments in ultrashort time echo (UTE)
MRI have enabled the detection of short T2 species such as cortical bone.
MR-based cortical bone imaging has the potential to serve as a non-invasive
alternative to computed tomography (CT). In this study, 3D UTE sequences with a
combination of varying echo time and RF pulse duration, with and without
off-resonance saturation pulse, are utilized to image the human skull. Image
subtraction and normalization are used to highlight cortical bone in the
craniofacial region. Magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) maps can also be
generated for quantitative bone imaging.
Introduction
Conventional clinical MRI techniques are unable
to image cortical bone due to its ultrashort T2.(1) The T2 of bone is much shorter than the echo time
(TE) used in conventional clinical sequences. This means that, in a
conventional sequence, the transverse magnetization of bone has relaxed substantially
before data acquisition begins, leading to no signal obtained. Ultrashort echo
time (UTE) sequences allow the data acquisition to begin before signals in
short-T2 species have substantially or completely decayed.(2,3) The subsequent challenge is about obtaining contrast for
bone.
Several studies have successfully increased
contrast in cortical bone through subtraction.(4–6) Due to its ultrashort T2, the bone is much more
sensitive to an off-resonance saturation pulse than fat, water, or other long-T2
species. Therefore, subtraction of UTE images without and with off-resonance saturation
can efficiently suppress longer T2 species, isolating cortical bone signal.(4) This idea can also be implemented through the
manipulation of MR parameters. TE and RF pulse width can be manipulated such
that only a narrow range of short-T2 species are affected.(6) This means that the subtraction of images generated from
UTE sequences with varying TE or RF pulse width can be made to suppress signals
from species with a certain range of T2 while isolating the rest. Several
previous studies have shown that manipulation of TE and RF pulse width
differences can be used to isolate cortical bone signals.(5,6) In this study, we combined the idea of TE and RF
manipulation with an off-resonance saturation pulse to isolate the cortical
bone.Methods
UTE MRI scans were performed on a 3T clinical
scanner (MR750, GE Healthcare) using an 8-channel head coil. Human skull images
were generated using 3D UTE Cones sequences with a combination of short and
long TEs, multiple RF pulse widths, with (MT-ON) and without (MT-OFF) an off-resonance
saturation pulse. MT-OFF images were generated using 3D UTE with the shortest
TE (32 µs) and a short RF pulse width (64 µs). MT-ON images were generated
using 3D UTE with dual-echo and three different RF pulse widths (the same flip
angle), respectively. Summation (I+) and subtraction (I-) images were
generated through summation or subtraction of MT-OFF images by various MT-ON
images. The subtraction images were normalized by their corresponding summation
images to enhance bone contrast further. MT-ON and MT-OFF images generated
using the same TE and RF pulse width were used to calculate magnetization
transfer ratio (MTR) maps, which were derived by dividing the subtraction
images by MT-OFF images.
The 3D UTE-MT sequence parameters include a
Fermi-shaped pulse (duration=8ms and bandwidth=160Hz) for off-resonance
saturation with two different MT powers of 700° (MT-ON) and 0° (MT-OFF) and a
frequency offset of 2kHz, TR=104.8ms, TE1=32µs, TE2=2.2ms, flip angle (FA)=8°, RF
pulse width=64,600, and 1000µs, acquisition matrix=256x256, slice
thickness=2mm, 11 spokes acquired per MT pulse, and scan time=3min14sec. Results and Discussion
Figure 1
shows the source images generated from the variation of TE, RF pulse width, and
off-resonance saturation pulse. As expected, the MT-OFF image acquired with the
shortest TE and a short pulse width of 64µs shows the highest bone signal than
the rest of the source images. As RF pulse width was increased, bone signals
visibly decreased due to reduced excitation efficiency. The second echo images
show little bone signal due to fast T2* decay.
Figure 2 shows
results involving images generated only by the first TE. As expected, the
contrast of cortical bone region in the dual-RF subtraction images is visibly
higher than in the single-RF subtraction image, where the cortical bone is
barely visible. The contrast of cortical bone is enhanced further in all of the
normalized images. The cortical bone is demarcated even in the single-RF
normalized image.
Figure 3
shows results involving images generated from MT-ON images from the late TE and
MT-OFF images from the first TE. As expected, the difference in TE increases bone
contrast. The cortical bone is more clearly visible in Figure 3 than in
Figure 2. The morphological features of bone are apparent in the
normalized images, which show cortical layers of bone enveloping what seems to
be a spongy bone construct in the middle.
Figure 4
compares the results obtained from 3D UTE sequences with a short RF pulse
excitation (64µs), without and with off-resonance saturation. The normalized
dual-UTE-OSC subtraction image shows excellent contrast for the craniofacial
bone. Volumetric MTR maps were generated for quantitative assessment of the
organic matrix density in the skull.Conclusion
The dual-echo dual-RF UTE-OSC sequence can
generate high contrast morphological images of the skull. The dual-echo single-RF
counterpart (dual-UTE-OSC) produces both qualitative and quantitative MTR mapping
of the skull and may be more beneficial for clinical applications.Acknowledgements
The
authors acknowledge grant support from the National Institutes of Health
(R01AR068987, R01AR062581, and K01AR080257) and GE Healthcare.References
1. Reichert ILH, Robson MD, Gatehouse PD, et al. Magnetic
resonance imaging of cortical bone with ultrashort TE pulse sequences. Magn.
Reson. Imaging 2005;23:611–618 doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.02.017.
2. Du J, Carl M, Bydder M, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM.
Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical
bone. J. Magn. Reson. 2010;207:304–311 doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.09.013.
3. Krug R, Larson PEZ, Wang C, et al. Ultrashort echo time MRI
of cortical bone at 7 Tesla field strength: A feasibility study. J. Magn.
Reson. Imaging 2011;34:691–695 doi: 10.1002/jmri.22648.
4. Du J, Takahashi AM, Bydder M, Chung CB, Bydder GM.
Ultrashort TE imaging with off-resonance saturation contrast (UTE-OSC). Magn.
Reson. Med. 2009;62:527–531 doi: 10.1002/mrm.22007.
5. Lee H, Zhao X, Song HK, Zhang R, Bartlett SP, Wehrli FW.
Rapid dual-RF, dual-echo, 3D ultrashort echo time craniofacial imaging: A
feasibility study. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;81:3007–3016 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27625.
6. Johnson EM, Vyas U, Ghanouni P, Pauly KB, Pauly JM.
Improved cortical bone specificity in UTE MR Imaging. Magn. Reson. Med.
2017;77:684–695 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26160.