Kiyoka Maeba1, Akihiko Kanki1, Yoshihiko Fukukura1, Hidemitsu Sotozono1, Akira Yamamoto1, and Tsutomu Tamada1
1Kawasaki Medical School Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
Synopsis
Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Pancreas
This study focused
on the feasibility of quantitative MR evaluation of the pancreas parenchyma in
patients with IPMN as a non-invasive tool for predicting the risk of
malignancy. Our study showed that increased signal intensity on T2WI and longer
T1 relaxation time were associated with a higher risk of malignant IPMN. These
results suggested that quantitative MR evaluation of the underlying pancreas
parenchyma in patients with IPMN can be a surrogate marker for predicting
malignant IPMN.
INTRODUCTION
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm
(IPMN) is characterized by an expansion of the main pancreatic duct or a branch
due to a papillary growth of the epithelium, with rich mucin production, and
are categorized into three forms on the basis of areas of involvement: main
pancreatic duct, side-branch ducts, or combined1-3. The natural
history of IPMN has been documented as a so-called adenoma-carcinoma sequence,
where the ultimate form of malignant progression is invasive carcinoma4,5.
The 2017 International Association of Pancreatology consensus guidelines for
the management of IPMN (IAPCG2017) classified into three categories, i.e.
high-risk stigmata (HRS), including all MD-IPMNs, worrisome features (WF), and
low-risk lacking HRS and WF to avoid excessive surgery” 6. However,
relevant operability is still uncertain, and thus identifying reliable
predictive factors for malignant IPMN is a key imperative. Cancer-associated
fibroblasts are observed in the tumor-associated stroma of various cancers
including those of the breast, prostate, and pancreas. However, it is unclear
whether the cancer-related imaging features of the pancreas parenchyma in
patients with IPMNs can be surrogate markers for predicting malignant IPMN.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was
to clarify the association of quantitative MRI indices of the underlying
pancreas parenchyma with the progression of IPMN.METHODS
This retrospective
study received institutional review board approval. One hundred five patients
composed of 45 patients with no history of pancreas disease (normal group) and
60 patients with IPMN (IPMN group) underwent abdominal MRI including multi-echo
3D Dixon T1WI, fat-saturated turbo-spin echo T2WI, single-shot echo-planar DWI
with b-values of 0, 200, and 1500 s/mm2, and T1-mapping images
acquired using Look-Locker inversion recovery sequences. The pancreas-to-muscle
signal intensity ratios on in-phase imaging (SIR-I), opposed-phase imaging
(SIR-O), T2WI (SIR-T2), and DWI (SIR-DWI), and proton density fat fraction
(PDFF) calculated with multi-echo 3D Dixon T1WI, ADC and shifted ADC (sADC)
with DWI, and T1 relaxation time on T1 map were measured using an ROI. ADC and
sADC values were calculated as follows: ADC=ln (S0/S1500)/1500 and
sADC=ln (S200/S1500)/1300, where S0, S200, and S1500 are the signal with
b-values of 0, 200, and 1500 s/mm2, respectively. The IPMN group was
divided into high-risk group with high-risk stigmata or worrisome features
(n=28) and low-risk group (n=32), according to the IAPCG2017. Spearman's rank
correlation coefficient, and univariate and multivariate ordinary logistic
regression analyses were performed to analyze the relationship with the
progression of IPMN (the normal group, low-risk group, high-risk group).
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were also used to
analyze quantitative MRI indices for differentiating between normal and IPMN groups,
and between low-risk and high-risk IPMN groups.RESULTS
The progression of IPMN showed positive
relationships with SIR-T2 (Spearman’s coefficient=0.30, P=0.002), PDFF
(Spearman’s coefficient=0.27, P=0.006), and T1 relaxation time (Spearman’s
coefficient=0.49, P<0.001) within the pancreas parenchyma (Figs 1 and 2). In
ordinary logistic regression analyses univariate and, SIR-T2 (odds ratio=2.83,
P=0.011) and T1 relaxation time (odds ratio=1.01, P<0.001) were associated
with the progression of IPMN (Fig.3).
For differentiating IPMN from normal
patients, only T1 relaxation time within the pancreas parenchyma was an
independent index (odds ratio=1.01, P=0.001, AUC=0.74 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.84])
(Fig. 4). SIR-T2 (odds ratio=0.99, P=0.001) and T1 relaxation time (odds
ratio=1.00, P=0.005) were independent indices for predicting the high-risk
group in IPMN patients (AUC=0.81 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.92]) (Fig. 5).DISCUSSION
In our study, higher pancreas-to-muscle
signal intensity ratio on T2WI and longer T1 relaxation time within the
pancreas parenchyma were significantly related factors of IPMN with high-risk
stigmata or worrisome features, as demonstrated by multivariate analysis.
Acute and chronic pancreatitis are
reported to be often present in patients with IPMN because of occlusion of the
MPD by mucin. The presence of inflammation is considered to be a source of
increased signal intensity on T2WI and longer T1 relaxation time that could
serve as an imaging biomarker of fibrosis in the pancreas because there is a
close topographical relationship between inflamed areas and those areas that
develop fibrosis.
Our results showed that T1 relaxation time within the pancreas
parenchyma was an independent index for differentiating between normal and IPMN
groups, and between low-risk and high-risk IPMN groups. These results are
supported by a prior histological study, which showed that the degree of
fibrosis in the pancreas parenchyma showed an association with the progression
of IPMN and could become a new marker for determining the indications for
surgery7.
CONCLUSION
T1 relaxation time
measurement of the underlying pancreas parenchyma may be useful for predicting
the presence of IPMN and identifying high-risk IPMN.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Lafemina J et al.
Malignant progression in IPMN: a cohort analysis of patients initially selected
for resection or observation. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20(2):440-447.
2. Gourgiotis S et al.
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Eur J Surg Oncol
2007;33(6):678-684.
3. Caponi S et al. Adjuvant
chemotherapy seems beneficial for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous
neoplasms. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39(4):396-403.
4. Yamaguchi K et al.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma derived from IPMN and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
concomitant with IPMN. Pancreas 2011;40(4):571-580.
5. Kobayashi G et al.
Natural history of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with
mural nodules: a Japan Pancreas Society multicenter study. Pancreas
2014;43(4):532-538.
6. Tanaka M et al. Revisions
of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the
pancreas. Pancreatology 2017;17(5):738-753.
7. Kakizaki Y et al. Stromal
Fibrosis and Expression of Matricellular Proteins Correlate with Histological
Grade of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas. Pancreas
2016;45(8):1145-1152.