Tong Fu1, Rongrong Pan2, Youyong Tian2, Qing Gao2, Xinying Wu 1, Lindong Liu1, Hai Lin3, and Yongming Dai3
1Department of Radiology, Nanjing first hospital,Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, 2Department of Neurology, Nanjing first hospital,Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, 3Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Multi-Contrast
Quantitative
MRI can measure a variety of physiological tissue parameters, such as
longitudinal T1 value, transverse T2 value and proton density, iron content and
fat content. We tried to apply a multi-parametric MR imaging technique of MULTIPLEX that provides the maps of
T1, T2*, proton density and quantitative susceptibility mapping into the
diagnosis of early Parkinson’s disease
(PD). We found that MULTIPLEX could
provide comprehensive and quantitative assessment of Parkinson’s disease-related subcortical nucleus and dopaminergic midbrain regions captured in multiple MR imaging parameters, which might assist in the diagnosis and better
understanding of early Parkinson’s disease under tight clinical time-constraints.
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by the
classical motor features of parkinsonism. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),
including T1, T2*,
Neuromelanin-Sensitive imaging,
Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) and quantitative susceptibility
mapping (QSM), has proved to provide
multiple index to make diagnosis and further understand the complex pathological
progress of PD[1–4]. Complex MRI sequence obtaining more
imaging index requires longer time than standard clinic MR scanning, which
subsequently requires longer time for patients to keep still for MR imaging.
However, with tremor and bradykinesia symptoms, long time stillness for MRI
scanning would be
problematic for PD patients.
Accelerated whole-brain multi-parametric MR imaging to acquire quantitative multi-contrast
information is needed. MULTIPLEX is a single-scan 3D
multi-parametric MR imaging, providing qualitative and quantitative
images T1, T2*, proton density maps, SWI and QSM information with a scanning
time of 10:15 minutes [5]. This study aimed to investigate its feasibility of
clinical application in early Parkinson’s disease.
Methods
We
recruited 20 early Parkinson’s disease patients (age range: 54-84 years,
disease duration: 1-5 years) and 25 healthy control (HC) subjects who underwent
MULTIPLEX acquisition in a 3T MRI system (uMR
780, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China). First, we explored the
feasibility of MULTIPLEX (10:15 minutes scan
time) for its use in clinical routine imaging, focusing on image
reconstruction, parameter estimation, and contrast-weighted image synthesis.
Second, according to the CIT168 atlas, the ROI-based analysis was conducted to extract
quatitative parameters using histogram analysis and then identify abnormal T1,
T2*, proton density maps and QSM values from the 16 human subcortical brain
nuclei. The first group includes subcortical nuclei that are, either directly
or indirectly, modulated by dopamine release, and guide behavior, including the
caudate nucleus (Ca) and putamen (Pu), and downstream areas such as the
external and internal segments of the globus pallidus (GPe and GPi,
respectively), the subthalamic nucleus (STH), and the substantia nigra pars
reticulata (SNr). The second group of nuclei drive activity in the dopaminergic
midbrain and include the hypothalamus (HTH), habenular nucleus (HN), ventral
pallidum (VeP), and the nucleus accumbens (NAC). The third group is comprised
of the dopaminergic midbrain regions, including the substantia nigra pars
compacta (SNc), parabrachial pigmented nucleus (PBP), and the ventral tegmental
area (VTA). The final group consists of landmark structures including the
extended amygdala (EXA), red nucleus (RN), and mammillary nucleus (MN). The
flowchart of the study is illustrated in Figure 1.
Results
The demographic
characteristics and clinical assessment of all participants were summarized in Table 1. All image reconstruction and
processing were automatically performed using in-house C++ programs on the
ADEPT (United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China) platform. The MULTIPLEX produced T1, T2*, PD maps and
susceptibility-weighted images and the corresponding quantitative maps (1×1×1
mm3 voxel size) without any extra scan time. The ROI-based analysis
revealed significantly decreased kurtosis of T1 in PBP, skewness of proton
density maps in PBP, skewness and kurtosis of T1 in VTA, standard deviation of
T1 in SNc and increased skewness of T2* in GPi in PD patients, compared to HC
(all p values < 0.01, after false discovery rate correction; Figure 2). Moreover,
the diagnostic performance of these six quantitative parameters was listed in
Table 2, using the ROC analysis.
Discussion & Conclusion
Our
results derived from MULTIPLEX provided multiple imaging information showed
consistency to previous studies which would help for early PD diagnosis and
better understand the hetergenerity of the pathology of PD. The alteration
index of T1 and PD maps in PBP, T1 in VTA, T1 in SNc and T2* in GPi showed
consistency to previous studies of PD[4,
6–8]. The alteration of
these structure implied the dysfunction of dopaminergic neurons and its
projection in PD pathology progress. Our PD patients showed no positive results
in QSM, which might attribute to their early disease phase with no obviously higher
iron content in these anatomic structures.The diagnostic value of our
quantitative parameters were validated with dedicated algorithm to achieve AUC
from 0.717-0.818, which imply the robustness of our results. Comparing with
previous representative multiple parametric methods, MULTIPLEX showed
advantages in improvement of SNR and
flexibility[5,
9]. Our promising findings
warrant further validation with larger sample size and advanced PD patients in
the future.
In conclusion, MULTIPLEX
could provide comprehensive and quantitative assessment of Parkinson’s disease-related ubcortical nucleus and dopaminergic midbrain regions captured in multiple MR imaging parameters. MULTIPLEX is a promising MR
sequence to apply in clinic for time saving to prevent PD patients from
unbearable long time of MR examination. It has potential to assist in the diagnosis of early Parkinson’s
disease and better
understanding of early Parkinson’s disease. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Biondetti E, Santin MD, Valabrègue R, et
al. The spatiotemporal changes in dopamine, neuromelanin and iron
characterizing Parkinson’s disease. Brain
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab191.
2. Fu T, Klietz M, Nösel P, et al. Brain
Morphological Alterations Are Detected in Early‐Stage Parkinson’s Disease with
MRI Morphometry. J Neuroimaging 2020;30:786–92.
3. Liu Y, Li J, He N, et al. Optimizing
neuromelanin contrast in the substantia nigra and locus coeruleus using a
magnetization transfer contrast prepared 3D gradient recalled echo sequence. Neuroimage
2020;218:116935.
4. He N, Ghassaban K, Huang P, et al. Imaging
iron and neuromelanin simultaneously using a single 3D gradient echo
magnetization transfer sequence: Combining neuromelanin, iron and the
nigrosome-1 sign as complementary imaging biomarkers in early stage Parkinson’s
disease. Neuroimage 2021;230:117810.
5. Ye Y, Lyu J, Hu Y, et al. MULTI-parametric
MR imaging with fLEXible design (MULTIPLEX). Magn Reson Med
2022;87:658–73.
6. Schwarz ST, Xing Y, Tomar P, et al. In
Vivo assessment of brainstem depigmentation in Parkinson disease: Potential as
a severity marker for multicenter studies. Radiology 2017;283:789–98.
7. Huynh B, Fu Y, Kirik D, et al. Comparison
of Locus Coeruleus Pathology with Nigral and Forebrain Pathology in Parkinson’s
Disease. Mov Disord 2021;36:2085–93.
8. Prodoehl J, Planetta PJ, Kurani AS, et al.
Differences in Brain Activation Between Tremor- and Nontremor-Dominant
Parkinson Disease. JAMA Neurol 2013;70:100.
9. Haacke EM, Chen Y, Utriainen D, et al.
STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo ( STAGE ) imaging , part III : Technical
advances and clinical applications of a rapid multi-contrast multi-parametric
brain imaging method. 2020;65:15–26.