Sai Abitha Srinivas1, Christopher E Vaughn1, Jonathan B Martin 1, and William A Grissom1
1Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Low-Field MRI, Low-Field MRI
Traditional
B
0 gradients have several drawbacks including high acoustic noise,
PNS, bulkiness, and high cost. To address this, we present a coil system for
Bloch-Siegert (BS) RF encoding comprising an optimized square root solenoid with a
bucking coil for high efficiency encoding and a nested uniform saddle coil for
the imaging Tx/Rx coil at 47.5mT (2MHz), a field strength that is
especially attractive due to its low SAR and accessibility. The coil designed
for in-vivo imaging was evaluated in simulation including SAR
measurements and experimentally on a resolution phantom using a 3D BS phase-encoded
imaging and optimized ‘U’ shaped pulses.
Introduction
Conventional B0 gradients are loud,
compromising patient comfort, and are expensive1. As an alternative
to B0 gradients, RF gradient encoding has the potential to bring
about low-cost, compact, and silent MR imaging. Here we demonstrate the use of
the Bloch-Siegert shift2 due to its ability to produce linear
phase/frequency shifts in the transverse plane without modulating the magnitude
of the magnetization, at low-field using an optimized coil system for extremity(wrist)
in-vivo imaging as well as SAR calculations as pulses used for BS
encoding are SAR intensive.Methods
The encoding coil optimization is
done using a method like Ref3 which was modified to produce a target
field of a square-root field. While this can provide a linear
field, it is also essential to be as close to 0 as possible
on one end of the coil since only the slope of the field matters and a
non-zero intercept on one end represents wasted power. To achieve this, 12 bucking windings were then manually
added to the optimized coil design to cancel the fringe $$$B_1^+$$$-field
at the low $$$B_1^+$$$-field end. The coil (d=16cm, L=30cm, Total number of
windings=52) has ROI of 19cm for the square root field, constructed using
Litz wire with two distributed capacitors. The encoding coil and the winding
pattern are shown in Figure 1A-B. The measured values of the coil were: L=164uH
and Q=60. Due to arcing considerations in in-vivo imaging, a minimum gap
of 1mm was used between windings. These bucking
windings also reduced the overall inductance of the coil since they are in an opposing
series configuration(without bucking L=250uH). A uniform saddle coil was constructed for imaging experiments. Figure 1C-F show the exploded view of the
coils and the overall setup for wrist imaging including the phantoms used for
validation. Additionally, interchangeable imaging coils (Saddle, loop, and
double loop for parallel Rx) can be attached to the imaging coil holder as shown
in Figure 2A-C along with the wrist placement in the saddle coil. Figure 2D
shows the decoupling between the saddle imaging and encoding coil with and
without loading. Since
the frequency and phase shifts applied to an object by BS encoding are
proportional to
$$$B_1^2$$$, Figure 3A shows the $$$B_1^+$$$map acquired through simulations and the average
$$$B_1^2$$$profiles.
The FDA limits specific absorption rate (SAR) for
extremity imaging with a local transmit coil to 20W/kg averaged over 6 mins4.
We performed SAR calculations for the wrist using the optimized encoding coil in the magneto-quasistatic simulator in Sim4life (Medtech, Zurich,
Switzerland). The Yoon-sun hand model shown in Figure 4A was used
with dielectric properties given in Figure 4B. Figures 4C-D
show the peak-spatial SAR (psSAR) for 1g of tissue for in the sagittal and
coronal planes respectively in the center slices of the hand model. Given our
calculations are in continuous-wave mode, we can calculate the SAR for a pulse
sequence:
$$SAR = \frac{SAR_{B1} \times \tau }{TR} =SAR_{B1} \times D$$
Where $$$\tau$$$ is the length of the BS pulse and D is the
Duty-cycle of the pulse. We used a maximum pulse length of 16ms with a minimum TR
of 350ms.
Two
8ms optimized BS phase-encoding pulses5 with BS frequency-offset=10KHz and Kbs=43
each were used to apply phase encoding. A 3D GRE sequence (Sequence parameters: TE=27.3ms,
TR=439ms, NPE=67, NFE=128, Naverages=10) reported
previously6 was used with a phase drift navigator on the 47.5 mT scanner (Sigwa,
Boston NMR, Boston, MA). The RF coils were placed in a shielded box and
remaining EMI was removed using EDITER7. To map the $$$B_1^+$$$field of the encoding coil and to produce the encoding fields using the Bloch
Siegert technique8, a rounded cylinder phantom (16cm (L) x 7.5(D))
filled with Mineral oil was used. The$$$B_1^+$$$maps that were
experimentally obtained are shown in Figure 2B. Additionally, to validate phase
encoding, a resolution phantom (Figure 1C) that was also filled with mineral
oil was imaged. To verify RF phase encoding capabilities, the BS pulse
amplitude was varied for across 33 amplitudes and two frequency polarities (total
encodes=66). The transceiver saddle coil was used with an active TR switch9.
The optimized coil was used for encoding. B0 gradients were used
for frequency encoding along the Z-direction(kx). Image
reconstruction was done using the method described previously6. The
encoding fields used are shown in Figure 5A. The B0 encoded image, a
NUFFT and the full-model reconstruction of the resolution phantom are shown in
Figure 5B-D. Results
The coil simulation and experimental B12
linear fit had R2 = 0.9974 and 0.9994 with both y-intercepts at 0. The measured
decoupling between the coils was ~32dB. The shift between unloaded and loaded
conditions was minimal(<3KHz). For the peak B1 of 0.55G and duty-cycle of 0.0457,
the simulation yielded a Volume-average SAR= 2.01milliWatts/kg, psSAR
averaged over 1g of tissue= 15.1milliWatts/kg and psSAR averaged over 10g
of tissue= 7.2milliWatts/kg. All these values are well below the FDA
limitations. Discussion and conclusion
In this work we show an
optimized coil setup that can do wrist in-vivo BS spatial encoding in
one dimension. EMI and B0
shim challenges will be addressed to achieve in-vivo imaging in the
future. We also
plan to image with the parallel Rx for higher SNR. Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grant R01 EB030414.References
[1] Wald LL, McDaniel PC, Witzel T, Stockmann JP, Cooley CZ.
Low-cost and portable MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging.
2020;52(3):686-696. doi:10.1002/jmri.26942
[2] F Bloch and A Siegert. Magnetic resonance for nonrotating
fields. Phys Rev, 57:522–527, 1940.
[3] Shen S, Xu
Z, Koonjoo N, Rosen MS. Optimization of a Close-Fitting Volume RF Coil for
Brain Imaging at 6.5 mT Using Linear Programming. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.
2021;68(4):1106-1114. doi:10.1109/TBME.2020.3002077
[4] MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) | FDA. Accessed Oct 31st 2022
[5] Martin, JB, Srinivas, SA, Vaughn, CE, Sun, H, Griswold, MA, Grissom, WA. Selective
excitation localized by the Bloch–Siegert shift and a B1+ gradient. Magn
Reson Med. 2022; 88( 3): 1081- 1097. doi:10.1002/mrm.29271
[6] Srinivas SA et al. EMI-Suppressed Gradient-Free Phase-Encoded Imaging at 47.5mT Using an
Optimized Square-Root Solenoid with Bucking Coil for Encoding and a Nested
Saddle Coil for Imaging. In Proceedings 30th Scientific Meeting,ISMRM p 0062, 2022.
[7] Srinivas, SA, Cauley, SF, Stockmann, JP, et al. External
Dynamic InTerference Estimation and Removal (EDITER) for low field MRI. Magn
Reson Med. 2021; 87: 614– 628. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28992
[8] Sacolick LI, Wiesinger F, Hancu I, Vogel MW. B1 mapping by
Bloch-Siegert shift. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(5):1315-1322.
doi:10.1002/mrm.22357
[9] Straney D, Cooley CZ and Rosen MS. An Improved
Power Handling Active Transmit/Receive Switch for Low Field MRI using Reed
Relays. In Proceedings 29th Scientific Meeting, ISMRM. p 1395, 2021.