Simon Laganiere1, Mark A Halko2, Luis Sierra3, Clementina Ullman3, Karen Hildebrand3, Magdaline Mwangi3, Julia Dierker3, Samuel Frank1, Kaitlin Toal3, and Sheeba Anteraper4
1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 2McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States, 3Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States, 4Stephens Family Clinical Research Institute, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Neurodegeneration, fMRI (resting state), Huntington disease, striatum, data-driven multi-voxel pattern analysis
Huntington
disease (HD) is a progressive, autosomal dominant disease caused by a
pathological expansion of CAG repeats in the HTT gene
1,2. A clinical diagnosis of
HD is made at the appearance of unequivocal motor signs. However, in the
“premanifest” stage, due to slowly progressive
neurodegenerative changes
1,2, subtle motor, psychiatric and cognitive decline occurs
many years prior to diagnosis
3. The sequelae of neural circuit
dysfunction remains unclear. Improving our mechanistic understanding of
functional brain connectivity alterations prior to disease manifestation will
help identify sensitive biomarkers of disease progression
1,4–6. Data-driven analysis of
high-quality functional magnetic resonance imaging data will guide such
efforts.
Introduction
Huntington
disease (HD) is a progressive, autosomal dominant disease caused by a
pathological expansion of CAG repeats in the HTT gene1,2. Genetic testing can
reliably identify individuals who will eventually develop HD; however, HD is a
slowly progressing disease with a long prodrome3 and hence there exists an
urgent need for
sensitive biomarkers of
disease progression4-6. Proximity
to clinical diagnosis is currently approximated using statistical models based upon CAG repeat length and age but these variables only
account for between 50% and 69% of the variance observed in age at diagnosis7,8. Current statistical models remain too
imprecise for predicting when overt symptoms will manifest at the individual
level. This in turn poses a significant challenge for the design of disease
modifying trials in HD as improperly timed interventions run the risk of being
initiated either too early (in which case, detecting a significant clinical
effect would be challenging) or too late (in which case irreversible changes
may already have occurred). Defining the earliest and most reliable biomarkers
of disease progression remains critically important9. This study examines the resting-state functional-connectivity
(rsFC) of adults with genetically-confirmed HD who are in the
premanifest stage using fMRI
data acquisition and analysis techniques including high temporal resolution using simultaneous multi-slice acquisition and unbiased whole-brain
connectome-wide multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) for the assessment
of rsFC.Methods
Participants: Genetically-confirmed HD
patients in the pre-manifest stage and healthy controls (HC) - matched for age, sex,
education - were recruited for fMRI sessions to assess both fMRI networks and
performance on multiple cognitive and motor tasks. HD subjects underwent clinical assessment
by
trained movement disorder neurologists
to ensure they were in the premanifest stage.
Image
Pre-Processing:
Resting-state fMRI data from HD and matched HC were preprocessed in SPM12 with realignment
with respect to the first volume and normalization to MNI space with respect to
the EPI template. CONN Toolbox was used for additional preprocessing steps such
as band pass filtering (0.008-0.1 Hz), physiological signal denoising to
eliminate contributions of white matter and cerebrospinal fluid, and regressing
out movement effects and their first-order derivatives along with motion
outliers. Quality assurance (QA) was carried out by examining between group
differences in head motion parameters.
Multi-voxel
Pattern Analysis (MVPA):
We
used the MVPA method implemented in the CONN Toolbox
(https://web.conn-toolbox.org/fmri-methods/connectivity-measures/networks-voxel-level).
MVPA consists of a two-level
dimension reduction process. At the first level, 64 PCA components are
retained
from voxel-to-voxel correlation structure for each subject. A multivariate connectivity map is constructed for
each
seed-voxel to all other voxels of the brain. This multivariate
connectivity map
is derived from the seed-based correlations for each seed-voxel
separately
using singular value decomposition for each subject for dimensionality-reduction. The
component
scores of these PCA components are then used for the second level analysis,
during
which 3 group-MVPA components are retained from the connectivity maps. Voxel
threshold of p < 0.001, and a cluster-wise-false discovery rate
corrected
threshold of p < 0.05 are used to determine the clusters that have
altered
rsFC for the F-test between the two groups (HD vs. HC) in a whole-brain
connectivity analysis. The
clusters generated by MVPA are then used as regions of interests (ROIs) for a
seed-based-connectivity analysis for further post-hoc characterization. For the
first-level seed-to-voxel analysis, Pearson’s correlation coefficients are
computed between the seed time-series and time-series of the rest of the voxels
in the brain volume. Whole-brain seed-to-voxel r-maps are then transformed to
z-maps and voxel-wise general linear model analysis are conducted on the
connectivity values at the second level for within group (HD, HC) comparisons.Results
18
HD patients and 18 HC were recruited. Mean HD age was 37.9+/-11, years of education 15+/-2.7 and 61% females. Group differences in
age, sex and education were not significant. A significant difference in mean head
motion, detected during QA, was accounted for in the second level analysis.
MVPA
converged on two clusters: left occipital cortex and left caudate (Fig. 1A).
Using these regions as seed ROIs for whole-brain seed-to-voxel analysis
revealed network level abnormalities in the HD group including 1) loss of
widespread negative correlations from left occipital cluster to multiple regions
within the prefrontal cortex and striatum and 2) loss of positive correlations between
the left caudate and bilateral prefrontal cortices (Fig. 1B).Discussion
The
rsFC abnormalities we report using whole-brain, data-driven
analyses support the hypothesis that brain-network changes precede clinical
diagnosis of HD, and highlight two networks centered on caudate and occipital
cortex. Both of these regions have previously been shown to undergo progressive
atrophy as the disease approaches the manifest HD state10. Circuit dysfunction within and between
these two regions may provide a functional link to the subtle, yet reliable cognitive
changes in the premanifest state, including, for example, early automated
visuospatial processing deficits11–13.Conclusion
Our results, coherent with existing structural, functional, and rsFC
literature in HD, extend previous literature reporting striatal and occipital
cortex abnormalities in the neuropathology of HD, and highlight the
occipital-striatal circuitry as a potential target for diagnostic, predictive,
and prognostic developments in HD.
Future investigation of this
circuitry in premanifest HD may reveal opportunities to detect disease progression at
an earlier stage, which is critically important for disease-modifying
treatment trials.Acknowledgements
This
study was funded in part by the Huntington’s disease Society of America (HDSA)
Human Biology project grant.References
1. Dogan I, Eickhoff CR, Fox PT, et al. Functional connectivity
modeling of consistent cortico-striatal degeneration in Huntington’s disease. Neuroimage
Clin. 2015;7:640-652. doi:10.1016/J.NICL.2015.02.018
2. Penney JB, Vonsattel JP, MacDonald ME, Gusella JF, Myers RH.
CAG repeat number governs the development rate of pathology in huntington’s
disease. Ann Neurol. 1997;41(5):689-692. doi:10.1002/ANA.410410521
3. Hart E, Middelkoop H, Jurgens CK, Witjes-Ané MNW, Roos RAC.
Seven-year clinical follow-up of premanifest carriers of Huntington’s disease.
PLoS Curr. Published online 2011. doi:10.1371/CURRENTS.RRN1288
4. Clinical and Biomarker Changes in Premanifest Huntington
Disease Show Trial Feasibility: A Decade of the PREDICT-HD Study - PMC.
Accessed October 28, 2022.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000999/
5. Tabrizi SJ, Reilmann R, Roos RAC, et al. Potential endpoints
for clinical trials in premanifest and early Huntington’s disease in the
TRACK-HD study: Analysis of 24 month observational data. Lancet Neurol.
2012;11(1):42-53. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70263-0
6. Ross CA, Aylward EH, Wild EJ, et al. Huntington disease:
Natural history, biomarkers and prospects for therapeutics. Nat Rev Neurol.
2014;10(4):204-216. doi:10.1038/NRNEUROL.2014.24
7. Paulsen JS, Langbehn DR, Stout JC, et al. Detection of
Huntington’s disease decades before diagnosis: The Predict-HD study. J
Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(8):874-880.
doi:10.1136/JNNP.2007.128728
8. Tabrizi SJ, Scahill RI, Owen G, et al. Predictors of
phenotypic progression and disease onset in premanifest and early-stage
Huntington’s disease in the TRACK-HD study: Analysis of 36-month observational
data. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(7):637-649.
doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70088-7
9. Paulsen JS, Long JD, Johnson HJ, et al. Clinical and
biomarker changes in premanifest Huntington disease show trial feasibility: A
decade of the PREDICT-HD study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6(APR).
doi:10.3389/FNAGI.2014.00078/ABSTRACT
10. Wijeratne PA, Garbarino S, Gregory S, et al. Revealing the
Timeline of Structural MRI Changes in Premanifest to Manifest Huntington
Disease. Neurol Genet. 2021;7(5):e617. doi:10.1212/NXG.0000000000000617
11. Kirkwood SC, Siemers E, Stout JC, et al. Longitudinal
cognitive and motor changes among presymptomatic Huntington disease gene
carriers. Arch Neurol. 1999;56(5):563-568.
doi:10.1001/ARCHNEUR.56.5.563
12. Lemiere J, Decruyenaere M, Evers-Kiebooms G, Vandenbussche E,
Dom R. Cognitive changes in patients with Huntington?s disease (HD) and
asymptomatic carriers of the HD mutation. J Neurol. 2004;251(8).
doi:10.1007/S00415-004-0461-9
13. Beglinger LJ, Duff K, Allison J, et al. Cognitive change in
patients with Huntington disease on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment
of Neuropsychological Status. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;32(6):573.
doi:10.1080/13803390903313564