Keywords: High-Field MRI, Data Acquisition, Brain imaging
Interest in pursuing MRI at ultra-high field (UHF) is increasing owing to increased SNR. However, MRI at UHF presents acquisition challenges due to decreased T2* and worsened field inhomogeneities. Rapid sampling strategies such as spiral and echo planar (EPI) acquisitions have been proposed to help mitigate these challenges. Incorporation of field monitoring to UHF applications has been demonstrated to improve the reconstruction of these images thanks to direct measurement and correction of spatiotemporal phase accrual. Here we demonstrate field-monitoring-enabled spiral and EPI acquisitions using Pulseq and field cameras.1. Kasper L, Engel M, Barmet C, Haeberlin M, Wilm BJ, Dietrich BE, Schmid T, Gross S, Brunner DO, Stephan KE, Pruessmann KP. Rapid anatomical brain imaging using spiral acquisition and an expanded signal model. Neuroimage 2018;168:88-100.
2. Vannesjo SJ, Wilm BJ, Duerst Y, Gross S, Brunner DO, Dietrich BE, Schmid T, Barmet C, Pruessmann KP. Retrospective correction of physiological field fluctuations in high-field brain MRI using concurrent field monitoring. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2015;73(5):1833-1843.
3. Layton KJ, Kroboth S, Jia F, Littin S, Yu H, Leupold J, Nielsen JF, Stöcker T, Zaitsev M. Pulseq: A rapid and hardware-independent pulse sequence prototyping framework. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2017;77(4):1544-1552.
4. Dietrich BE, Brunner DO, Wilm BJ, Barmet C, Gross S, Kasper L, Haeberlin M, Schmid T, Vannesjo SJ, Pruessmann KP. A Field Camera for MR Sequence Monitoring and System Analysis. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2016;75(4):1831-1840.
5. De Zanche N, Barmet C, Nordmeyer-Massner JA, Pruessmann KP. NMR probes for measuring magnetic fields and field dynamics in MR systems. Magn Reson Med 2008;60(1):176-186.
6. Wilm BJ, Barmet C, Pavan M, Pruessmann KP. Higher Order Reconstruction for MRI in the Presence of Spatiotemporal Field Perturbations. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2011;65(6):1690-1701.
7. Kasper L, Haeberlin M, Dietrich BE, Gross S, Barmet C, Wilma BJ, Vannesjo SJ, Brunner DO, Ruff CC, Stephan KE, Pruessmann KP. Matched-filter acquisition for BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 2014;100:145-160.
8. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Börnert P, Boesiger P. Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2001;46(4):638-651.
9. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1999;42(5):952-962.
Fig. 1. Single-shot 2D spiral and EPI protocols used in the current preliminary study for 7T brain imaging (top) and 10.5T phantom imaging (bottom). All image data were acquired from a single transverse slice located at the isocenter. All EPI data were obtained with a partial Fourier factor of 6/8. Other relevant imaging parameters common to both spiral and EPI acquisitions were: FOV = 230 mm, slice thickness = 2 mm, TE/TR = 22/400 ms, nominal excitation flip angle = 25 degrees, nominal fat saturation flip angle = 110 degrees.
Fig. 2. Concurrent field measurement on 7T Terra for single-shot 2D spiral (left panel) and EPI (right panel) readouts. In each case, shown are measured gradient waveforms (top) and corresponding k-space trajectories (bottom). The spiral readout (<26 ms in length) was an Archimedean spiral designed to achieve 1-mm in-plane resolutions with 5-fold k-space acceleration, whereas the EPI readout (<43 ms in length) was a standard EPI designed to achieve 1.5-mm in-plane resolutions with 3-fold k-space acceleration along with a partial Fourier factor of 6/8.
Fig. 3. Single-shot spiral and EPI acquisitions of the human brain with concurrent field monitoring on 7T Terra. Shown are offline image reconstructions with correction of static dB0 and dynamic field changes (up to second order terms) using an expanded signal model and based on data acquisition using protocols reported in Fig. 1. In all cases, the commercial Nova 1-channel transmit and 32-channel receive RF coil was used for data acquisition while a set of 19F NMR field probes placed between the transmit and receive portions of the Nova coil were used for concurrent field monitoring.
Fig. 4. Importance of static dB0 correction in fast spiral and EPI readout. Shown are the offline image reconstructions using the expanded signal model without (left) and with (right) dB0 correction, all with dynamic field corrections (up to second-order spherical harmonic basis terms). Note how including dB0 correction effectively improved image quality, reducing the otherwise blurring artifact (as indicated by the arrow) in spiral imaging and geometric distortion (as indicated by the arrowhead) in EPI.