Anthony Maroun1, Michael Scott1, Haben Berhane1, Justin J. Baraboo1, Kelly Jarvis1, Bradley D. Allen1, Alex J. Barker2, and Michael Markl1
1Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Flow, Valves
4D Flow MRI can identify aortic
regions exposed to high wall shear stress (WSS) compared to age and sex-matched
controls. This concept, known as WSS ‘heatmaps’, has recently shown potential
to improve risk stratification in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). We
examined the reproducibility of heatmaps in a cohort of 20 stable BAV patients
with five consecutive 4D flow MRI scans and found no significant change over time. In addition, we found high reproducibility of WSS patterns and regions of
elevated WSS across scans. Our findings, therefore, suggest that heatmaps can serve
as a robust BAV risk measure.
Introduction
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is
associated with progressive growth of the ascending aorta (AAo) which can lead
to severe complications such as aneurysm formation or dissection1. 4D
flow studies have demonstrated that BAV morphology results in abnormal
transvalvular flow patterns that lead to changes in aortic wall shear stress
(WSS), a known stimulus of aortic growth through tissue degeneration and elastin
fiber thinning2,3. To detect regional changes in aortic WSS outside the
normal physiologic range and to account for well-known WSS changes with age and
sex, we previously developed a heatmap approach. By co-registering the WSS of
an individual patient to the WSS distribution of an age and sex-matched control
population, ‘heatmaps’ can be derived to delineate regions of abnormally low/high
WSS (i.e., outside the 95% confidence interval of the control population)4.
This concept has recently been
applied in a longitudinal BAV patient study, showing that baseline heatmaps could
identify patients at risk for aortic growth5. To serve as a robust
baseline risk metric and given the slow published rates of aortic growth in BAV
(0.24-0.4mm/year), it is critical to understand the reproducibility and
stability of heatmaps over time. Hence, the purpose of this study was to
evaluate changes in heatmaps in a multi-scan follow-up study in a cohort of
clinically stable BAV patients who underwent five consecutive cardiothoracic
MRIs, including 4D flow MRI. Our goal was to assess the reproducibility of
heatmaps for the quantification of the relative area exposed to elevated WSS in
the AAo. Methods
BAV patients with five cardiothoracic
MRIs, including 4D flow MRI, were retrospectively identified. The exclusion
criteria were patients with any two consecutive scans <6 months apart,
connective tissue disease, or aortic/valve surgery. Mid-AAo diameters were extracted from the
radiology report of the first and fifth scans to calculate AAo growth rates (GR).
To compute maps for physiologically normal aortic WSS, healthy controls (n=125,
age: 50.7±15.8
years, 67M, 58F) with a normal aortic valve were included as part of an ongoing
study. All MRIs were performed using 1.5 or 3.0T systems (Siemens, Germany) and
included a sagittal oblique, prospectively ECG and respiratory-gated aortic 4D
flow acquisition. Data were processed using an AI pipeline capable of correcting
for eddy current, velocity noise and aliasing, and generating a 3D aortic segmentation6,7
(Figure 1). The AAo was then defined by placing a plane proximal to the
brachiocephalic trunk, and the corresponding systolic peak velocity and
WSS were calculated. As previously described, patient-specific WSS heatmaps
were computed relative to a WSS map generated for each patient based on an
atlas generated from the 4D flow-derived systolic WSS of 10 or more sex and age-matched
controls (within ±5 years of patient age at the time of scan)5. The
relative areas exposed to elevated WSS in the AAo (AAo area of elevated WSS/Total AAo area) were subsequently calculated
for all scans.
Statistical analysis
Normality was assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
test. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to determine if there was a
difference in peak velocity, WSS, and relative area of elevated WSS in the AAo between
scans. Results
Twenty patients (age: 48.4±13.9 years,
14M) with n=100 4D flow MRIs (5/patient) acquired between 2011 to 2019 were
included. Patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1. Mean follow-up
duration between the baseline MRI (scan 1) and scan 5 was 5.5±1.1 years (Figure
2). Mid-AAo diameters yielded an average AAo GR of 0.6±0.3 mm/year. Figure 3
displays an example BAV case with five consecutive scans and the corresponding
WSS and heatmaps. The AAo WSS patterns and areas of elevated WSS were highly
reproducible and stable over time. Findings across the entire study cohort are
summarized in figure 4, which shows the multi-year distribution of peak velocity, WSS, and
relative area of elevated WSS in the AAo. One-way repeated measures ANOVA
showed no significance difference in peak velocity, WSS, and relative area of elevated WSS
(p=0.64, p=0.69, and p=0.35, respectively) between all scans. Discussion
In
recent years, the concept of WSS heatmaps has emerged as a promising biomarker for
BAV aortopathy risk stratification. The goal of this study was to investigate
heatmap reproducibility across multiple scans in a cohort BAV
patients. All
patients were clinically stable and had a GR below the 3mm/year threshold for
surgery. It is notable, however, that these GR were higher on average than has
been reported in studies with a follow-up period >5 years5,8. This
may be due to interobserver bias, as aortic diameters were taken from radiology
reports for this study. Relative
area of elevated WSS showed no significant change over time. Notably, in most
cases we detected not only a stable relative area across all 5 scans, but also
similarities in the location and pattern of regions of elevated WSS. This suggests
that the individualized approach to assess regional WSS is robust, reproducible,
and able to delineate areas of abnormal WSS in an aging aorta. Conclusion
Elevated
areas of WSS identified on heatmaps are reproducible and stable over time in
clinically stable BAV patients. Therefore, our findings suggest that heatmaps are
a robust measure that can be used for BAV risk assessment at any time of
disease course.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Verma S, Siu SC. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid
aortic valve. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(20):1920-1929. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1207059
2. Bollache E, Guzzardi DG, Sattari S, et al. Aortic valve-mediated
wall shear stress is heterogeneous and predicts regional aortic elastic fiber
thinning in bicuspid aortic valve-associated aortopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 2018;156(6):2112-2120.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.095
3. Guzzardi DG, Barker AJ, van Ooij P, et al. Valve-Related
Hemodynamics Mediate Human Bicuspid Aortopathy: Insights From Wall Shear Stress
Mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(8):892-900. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1310
4. Van Ooij P, Potters WV, Nederveen AJ, et al. A methodology to
detect abnormal relative wall shear stress on the full surface of the thoracic
aorta using four-dimensional flow MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(3):1216-1227.
doi:10.1002/mrm.25224
5. Soulat G, Scott MB, Allen BD, et al. Association of Regional Wall
Shear Stress and Progressive Ascending Aorta Dilation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(1):33-42. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.06.020
6. Berhane H, Scott MB, Barker AJ, et al. Deep learning-based
velocity antialiasing of 4D-flow MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88(1):449-463. doi:10.1002/mrm.29205
7. Berhane H, Scott M, Elbaz M, et al. Fully automated 3D aortic
segmentation of 4D flow MRI for hemodynamic analysis using deep learning. Magn
Reson Med. 2020;84(4):2204-2218. doi:10.1002/mrm.28257
8. Guala A, Dux-Santoy L, Teixido-Tura G, et al. Wall Shear Stress
Predicts Aortic Dilation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve. JACC
Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(1):46-56. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.09.023