Eva S. Peper1,2, Dieuwertje Alblas3, Renske Merton4, Sibbeliene E. van den Bosch5, Anne Spakman4, Bram F. Coolen6, Gustav J. Strijkers6, Aart J. Nederveen4, Albert Wiegman5, Jelmer M. Wolterink3, Barbara A. Hutten7, and Pim van Ooij4
1Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2Translation Imaging Center (TIC), Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland, 3Department of Applied Mathematics, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, 4Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 5Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 6Department of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 7Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Synopsis
Keywords: Flow, Velocity & Flow, vessel wall, carotids, familial hypercholesterolemia
Familial hypercholesterolemia
(FH) leads to premature atherosclerosis. In this study we use 4D flow and 3D black
blood (BB) MRI to investigate carotid artery wall shear stress (WSS) and wall
thickness (WT) 3D maps and their relation, in FH patients on lifelong statin
prescriptions and their unaffected siblings (n=234). We applied machine
learning segmentation technology and 3D statistical analysis methods and found
that ensemble-averaged carotid WSS and WT maps were highly similar between the
groups. However, the 3D carotid correlation coefficient maps showed lower
agreement between WT and WSS in patients, suggesting abnormal wall remodeling
processes compared to the siblings.
Introduction
Familial
hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a condition characterized by elevated low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol levels, leading to an increased risk for premature
atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Lifelong lipid-lowering statin therapy
from early childhood slows thickening of the carotid intima-media, a
well-validated surrogate marker for future cardiovascular disease [1]. Increased wall thickness (WT) is
associated with low wall shear stress (WSS), the shear force of blood flow
mediating endothelial cell expression [2,3]. In this study we compared WSS and WT between
FH patients on lifelong statin therapy and their healthy siblings.
Additionally, we evaluated the association of WT with age, sex and WSS in 3D in
both groups.Methods
For this
cross-sectional study, 214 children (8-18 years) with FH who had undergone
randomization from 1997-1999 in a pravastatin trial were eligible [1]. Nearly 20 years later, the patients and
their 95 unaffected siblings were invited for follow-up measurements, including
MRI scans.
4D flow and black
blood (BB) MRI were used to investigate 3D WSS and WT maps. All scans were
performed with a Philips 3T Ingenia scanner using an 8-channel neck coil.
4D flow MRI scan parameters were: TR/TE/FA: 7.8ms/4.6ms/8°,
VENC=150cm/s, (0.8mm)3 spatial and 80ms temporal resolution and k-t
PCA acceleration factor 8, resulting in <10m scan time [4]. Image reconstruction was performed with
MRecon (Gyrotools, Zurich, Switzerland) and contained linear background phase
correction.
The 3D BB scan was
acquired in coronal orientation using Poisson-disk prospective undersampling in
multiple dimensions (PROUD) with acceleration factor 4, 2 signal averages, TR/TE/FA:
10ms/3.4ms/6°, and (0.5mm)3 spatial resolution. Scan time was 3m20s [5]. Compressed sensing image reconstruction
was performed with BART [6].
For a subset of 65
subjects, the carotids were semi-automatically segmented in Mimics (Materialise,
Leuven, Belgium) on 4D flow MRI-derived angiograms, from 3cm below to 2cm above
the bifurcation. The dataset was split up in a 52/13 training/test ratio for an
nnU-Net segmentation task [7], retrained on all 65 datasets, and applied
to the entire cohort. The images and masks were subsequently separated in left
and right carotids. Velocity vector data were visually inspected and excluded
when randomly directed (noisy data) or masked incorrectly. WSS was then calculated
on the peak-systolic timeframe [8].
Coronal BB data were
reoriented to axial slices. The inner and outer walls of left and right
coronary arteries were segmented using a rotation equivariant dilated
convolutional neural network based on automatically identified centerlines [9]. From these predictions, a surface mesh delineating
the vessel lumen and the orthogonal wall thickness on each mesh vertex was
derived. The results were inspected for accuracy and length and subjects were excluded
when contours were inaccurate or not entirely capturing the vessel wall 3cm
below and 2cm above the bifurcation.
4D flow MRI and BB
segmentations with similar lengths of common, internal and external carotid
artery were chosen as templates to which datasets were registered using
iterative closest point registration [10]. After nearest neighbor interpolation of
WSS and WT of every subject to the template, the mean and standard deviation of
WSS and WT were calculated on each wall point for patients and siblings
separately.
Statistical analysis
Analysis 1: On
each wall point , the p-value between patients and siblings was determined with
a two-sample t-test with significance of P<0.05 corrected for Bonferroni
(factor 4 for left and right WSS and WT comparisons).
Analysis 2: On
each wall point, the regression coefficient
r of WT with 1)age, 2)age+sex, 3)age+sex+WSS and 4)age+sex+WSS+WSS corrected for age and sex, was
calculated for patients and siblings separately [11]. Results
In figure 1 an
overview of the study population is given. About 18% of 4D flow and 25% of BB data
were excluded due to insufficient image quality. WSS and WT derivations for one
subject are displayed in figure 2.
For all analyses
age was identical (31±3 years), men/women ratios were 1:0.7 for patients and
1:1.5 for siblings. In figure 3, the ensemble-averaged maps and p-value maps
are shown. There were no significant differences in WSS or WT between patients
and siblings. In figure 4, the r-maps
are shown and in table 3 the median r
is given for each regression model. Siblings had higher median r than patients in all models.Discussion
Machine learning segmentations
and data quality were visually assessed by lack of gold standard. Based on this
assessment a relatively large portion of both patients and siblings was
excluded which can be attributed to subject motion, ECG failure, neck-fat
content, also resulting in segmentation failure. Nevertheless,
ensemble-averaged maps clearly showed low WSS and high WT in the carotid bulb
for both groups. Patients did not have higher WT than siblings, which may be an
effect of lifelong adequate statin therapy. The correlation coefficients
between WT and WSS were lower for patients, which may relate to abnormal wall
remodeling processes. With inclusion of pulse wave velocity (for vessel
stiffness), smoking status and blood pressure in the regression model, this abnormal
behavior can be further elucidated. Conclusion
3D mapping
techniques showed that there were no differences in carotid WT and WSS between
FH patients on lifelong statin therapy and their unaffected siblings. The
relation of WT with age, sex and WSS was weaker for patients. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Luirink IK, Wiegman A,
Kusters DM, Hof MH, Groothoff JW, de Groot E, et al. 20-Year Follow-up of
Statins in Children with Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1547–56.
2. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis.
J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:2035–42.
3. van Ooij P, Cibis M, Rowland EM, Vernooij MW, van der Lugt
A, Weinberg PD, et al. Spatial correlations between MRI-derived wall shear stress
and vessel wall thickness in the carotid bifurcation. Eur Radiol Exp.
2018;2:27.
4. Pedersen H, Kozerke S, Ringgaard S, Nehrke K, Kim WY. k-t PCA:
Temporally constrained k-t BLAST reconstruction using principal component
analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62:706–16.
5. Coolen BF, Motaal AG, Potters W V., Versluis M, Strijkers
GJ, Nederveen AJ. Prospective Acceleration and CS Reconstruction for 3D Isotropic
High-Resolution Carotid Imaging. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 24. 2016. p. 2546.
6. Uecker M, Tamir J, Ong F, Holme C, Lustig M. BART: version 0.4.01.
2017.
7. Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH. nnU-Net: a
self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation.
Nat Methods. 2021;18:203–11.
8. Potters WV, van Ooij P, Marquering HA, VanBavel E,
Nederveen AJ. Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast
MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:505–16.
9. Alblas D, Brune C, Wolterink J. Deep-learning-based carotid artery
vessel wall segmentation in black-blood MRI using anatomical priors. In: Išgum
I, Colliot O, editors. Med Imaging 2022 Image Process. SPIE; 2022. p. 24.
10. Audenaert EA, Van Houcke J, Almeida DF, Paelinck L, Peiffer M,
Steenackers G, et al. Cascaded statistical shape model based segmentation of
the full lower limb in CT. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin [Internet].
2019;22:644–57.
11. van Ooij P, Collins J, Fedak P, Nederveen A, Carr J, Markl M, et al.
3D Linear Regression Analysis Reveals Relationships of 4D flow MRI-derived
Aortic Dimensions with Age, Gender and Wall Shear Stress in Patients with
Aortopathy. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson 25. 2017. p. 0288.