Mathias Davids1,2, Livia Vendramini1, Valerie Klein1,2,3, Natalie Ferris4,5, Bastien Guerin1,2, and Lawrence L. Wald1,2,5
1Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States, 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3University Clinics Mannheim, Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Mannheim, Germany, 4Harvard Graduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States, 5Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Gradients, Gradients, gradient coil design, high-performance imaging
We report experimental PNS
threshold measurements of an asymmetric PNS optimized whole-body gradient coil
and compare it to a standard symmetric coil designed without PNS optimization.
Stimulation thresholds were measured in 10 healthy adult subjects for five
clinically relevant scan positions. The optimized design raised thresholds by
up to 47% in four out of the five studied scan positions (head, cardiac,
pelvic, and knee imaging positions). These results support the potential value of PNS-optimized asymmetric
whole-body gradients for maximizing image encoding performance
Purpose
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) limits the usable image encoding
performance of state-of-the-art body and head gradient coils [1-3]. We recently
developed an approach to model and incorporate PNS metrics during the coil
design phase to raise PNS thresholds and maximize image encoding performance [4].
We previously designed a pair of actively shielded torque/force balanced Y-axis
body coils (one with PNS optimization, one without) and compared their PNS
performance in modeling studies [5]. In this work, we constructed prototypes of
these two coils and validated the predicted PNS changes with experimental
threshold measurements in ten healthy volunteers.Methods
Coil
design:
We
designed two actively shielded whole-body Y-axis gradient coils (YG1 and YG2,
Fig. 1) using our PNS-constrained design framework [4]: YG1 is a conventional
design without PNS optimization while the YG2 design includes an additional PNS
constraint. PNS thresholds of YG2 were constrained to be 50%
higher than those of YG1 for the head imaging landmark while allowing a 15%
inductance increase. The two coils have otherwise identical design constraints
and dimensions, and are both torque and force balanced. Both coils have
relatively small inner diameter (and thus low inductance) to ensure that stimulation
can be achieved in both coils.
Coil construction: The coil formers
consist of flat ABS sheets with milled dovetail groves for the winding pattern.
The ABS sheets were bent and assembled, yielding a polygonal coil geometry. The
3.2 mm diameter enameled
copper wire was
hammered into the groove, and the coil was covered in epoxy-soaked fiber glass for
mechanical stability. The coils’ construction method limits their use to PNS
experiments outside of a static magnet field. The primary layer was cooled with
water blankets. The coil cart and the patient table were constructed from
T-slotted aluminum frames. We mechanically isolated the cart and patient table using
rubber dampeners to reduce the risk of false PNS positives due to table vibrations.
PNS Experiments:
A preliminary experimental PNS study was
performed under IRB approval and with written informed consent using 10 healthy
adult volunteers (4 males, 6 females), average age 37 ± 16 years (min. 25,
max. 69), weight 68.6 ± 13.9 kg (min. 49.4, max. 88.4), and height 169.3 ± 7.3 cm (min. 160, max. 182.9).
The stimulation waveforms consisted of 16 bipolar trapezoidal pulses with
varying rise times (100 to 500 μs) and amplitudes, and constant flat-top
duration (500 μs). Thresholds for both coils YG1 and YG2 were assessed in
a single session to reduce intra-subject variability from weight gain/loss,
level of hydration, etc. Changing the experimental setup from YG1 to YG2 took
approximately 10 minutes. For each subject and coil, we measured thresholds at five
different scan positions, mimicking head and cardiac imaging (head-first
supine) as well as abdominal, pelvic, and knee imaging (feet-first supine),
yielding a total of ten threshold curves per subject for the 1.5h experiment.
Results
Figure 2 shows
photographs of the experimental setup. The coil temperature change was ΔT ≤ 5°C over the course of the stimulation
experiment thanks to the low duty cycle (one pulse every 3 seconds) and cooling using chilled
water blankets.
Figure 3 shows PNS threshold curves for
both the unoptimized coil (YG1, black curves) and the coil optimized for head
imaging (YG2, red curves) for all five scan positions. PNS optimization raised
thresholds by 47.3% for head imaging. For cardiac and pelvic
imaging, PNS thresholds were raised by 45.4%
and 34.6%, respectively, despite the coil not
being explicitly optimized for these scan positions. For knee imaging, the PNS
thresholds of YG2 were not reached for most of the subjects, yielding an estimated
worst-case threshold improvement of 21.5% (assuming thresholds just outside the
operational parameter space). PNS thresholds for abdominal imaging did not change
between the optimized and unoptimized coils.
Figure 4 summarizes the sites of perceived
sensation reported by the subjects for three of the five scan positions and
both coils. For head imaging, the sites of perception remained similar between
YG1 and YG2. For cardiac imaging, reported perceptions shifted from the pelvis
to the shoulder/neck region. For abdominal imaging, stimulation sites shifted
from the torso and abdomen to the pelvis.
Figure 5 shows maximum intensity
projections of the simulated E-field at 100 T/m/s for three of the five scan
positions and both coils (YG1: left half of each panel; YG2: right half). For
head and cardiac imaging, YG2 lowered the peak E-fields induced in the body, leading
to the PNS threshold improvements shown in Fig. 3. For abdominal imaging, YG2
led to slightly higher E-fields.Conclusion
We constructed a prototype asymmetric PNS-optimized
whole-body gradient coil and compared it to its unoptimized counterpart. The
optimized coil has approx. 15% higher inductance and 5% higher resistance but
otherwise identical properties (gradient field efficiency, linearity, wire
spacing/bend radii, torque/force balancing, and coil former geometry). The PNS-optimized
coil raised thresholds by up to 47.3% in four of the five analyzed clinically
relevant scan positions. For abdominal imaging, the PNS optimization did not
significantly affect the thresholds. This study demonstrates the ability of
asymmetric whole-body gradient coils to substantially raise thresholds when
designed with explicit PNS constraints, thereby maximizing the usable image
encoding performance.Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge
the help of past and present members of the gradient coil group at Siemens
Healthineers, including Peter Dietz, Gudrun Ruyters, Axel vom Endt, Ralph
Kimmlingen, Franz Hebrank, and Eva Eberlein. Research reported in this
publication was supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and
Bioengineering, and the National Institute for Mental Health of the National
Institutes of Health under award numbers U01EB025162, P41EB030006, U01EB026996,
R01EB028250, U01EB025121. The content is solely the responsibility of the
authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National
Institutes of Health.References
[1] Setsompop
et al., “Pushing the limits of in vivo diffusion MRI for the human connectome
project”, NeuroImage, vol. 80, pp. 220 – 233, 2013
[2] McNab et
al., “The human connectome project and beyond: Initial applications of 300
mT/m gradients”, NeuroImage, vol. 80, pp. 234 – 245, 2013
[3] Tan et al.,
“Peripheral nerve stimulation limits of a high amplitude and slew rate
magnetic field gradient coil for neuroimaging”, Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 352–366, 2020.
[4] Davids et
al., “Optimization of MRI Gradient Coils with Explicit Peripheral Nerve
Stimulation Constraints”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2020, 40,
129-142
[5] Davids et
al., “Design Analysis and Prototype Construction of PNS Optimized MRI
gradient coils”, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, London,
UK, 2022