Hengjie Chen1, Jaime F Mata2, Y. Michael Shim2, John P. Mugler2, Xiaoping Hu1, Li Zhao3, An Liu4, and Kun Qing1,4
1University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States, 2University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States, 3Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 4City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Lung, Hyperpolarized MR (Gas)
In this work, a
2-point Dixon-based method is developed to provide separation of the
hyperpolarized xenon-129 dissolved-phase magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
components for pulmonary applications. Based on analysis of data from 6 healthy
volunteers and 20 patients with lung disease, the separated tissue and red
blood cell (RBC) components obtained from this method are highly consistent
with those from the previously-described 3-point Dixon method. The 2-point
Dixon based method has the potential to greatly improve the signal-to-noise
ratio for dissolved-phase MRI while still maintaining accurate tissue/RBC separation.
Introduction
Hyperpolarized xenon-129 dissolved-phase
(Xe129 DP) MRI [1, 2] provides direct assessment of gas exchange in the human
lung. It has shown highly promising diagnostic value for evaluating pulmonary
diseases [3-7]. To separate individual dissolved-phase components,
including xenon-129 in the pulmonary parenchyma/plasma (“tissue” or “membrane”)
and in red blood cells (“RBCs”), a Dixon-based method originally designed to separate
water and fat in proton MRI is often adapted for Xe129 DP-MRI. Kaushik et al. [2] developed a 1-point Dixon-based approach which aligns the
RBC and tissue signals to the real and imaginary channels and separates them.
However, the accuracy and robustness of this method is subject to B0
field inhomogeneity and based on pre-assumption of the two dissolved-phase
components which could change regionally in disease. Another approach [1], based on a conventional 3-point Dixon-based
acquisition, was originally described for application at 1.5T. However, due to
the short T2* of the dissolved-phase components, the third echo of
the dissolved-phase data usually has a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), making
it challenging to be used at 3T because the T2* values are even shorter
(~1 ms) than at 1.5T. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate a new 2-point
Dixon-based method to separate the two dissolved-phase Xe129 components. This method has potential to greatly improve
the quality of Xe129 DP-MRI compared to the 3-point Dixon approach.Methods
Xe129 DP-MRI data from 26 subjects,
including 6 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD), was used for this study. Each subject underwent the 3-point
Dixon-based acquisition as described in previous work [1].
The first two echoes (TE1/TE2 = 0.74/2.36
ms) of the Xe129 DP-MRI data, and the global free induction decay (FID) signal
acquired after the imaging data as described in [1], were used for reconstruction using the
2-point Dixon method. The following equation, adapted from the Bloch equations,
is used for reconstruction:
s(t)=e-i*φΔB*[MTISSUE*e-i*(wTISSUE*t+qTISSUE)*e-R2*TISSUE*t + MRBC*e-i*(wRBC*t+qRBC)*e-R2*RBC*t]
Among the variables, s(t) is the signal
of a voxel at time t. MTISSUE and MRBC are the Xe129 magnetization dissolved in the tissue and RBCs. The
field inhomogeneity factor φΔB is obtained from the difference of the two phases of the gas-phase
data, as described in [1]. The precession frequencies wTISSUE and
wRBC, precession
initial phases qTISSUE and
qRBC and decay constants R2*TISSUE and R2*RBC were estimated by least-square
fitting to the FID signal. Different ranges are given for individual parameters
during the fitting process to account for possible variations among subjects. The
FID fitting follows two steps. First, the modulus of the model was fit
to the amplitude of the FID, then the complex s(t) is fit to the complex FID with the above expression. Then the fitted parameters including wTISSUE, qTISSUE, R2*TISSUE, and wRBC, qRBC, R2*RBC are plugged in into the equation to
seek for best fit for each individual voxel.
For quantitative comparison, RBC-to-gas and tissue-to-gas ratios were
calculated to evaluate the differences between the original 3-point Dixon-based
and the newly developed 2-point Dixon-based method in separation of the two
dissolved-phase components. Results
Examples of the tissue and
RBC images separated by the original 3-point and the proposed 2-point
Dixon-based methods from a healthy volunteer and a COPD patient are shown in
Figure 1. Because only the first two echoes of the DP-MRI images were used, the
reconstructed tissue and RBC images using the proposed method have
significantly improved SNR compared to those reconstructed from three echoes. Highly consistent imaging features can be
observed in the two image sets.
Figure 2 shows a
Bland-Altman plot of the RBC-to-gas and tissue-to-gas ratios from the two
methods. The mean and standard deviation of the difference between the two
methods (3-point Dixon – 2-point Dixon) is -0.043±0.111 for the tissue-to-gas
ratios and 0.038±0.060 for the RBC-to-gas ratios. Discussion
Because the same ventilation (Gas)
images were used to calculate the tissue-to-gas and RBC-to-gas ratios, the
differences in the tissue-to-gas and RBC-to-gas ratios came from the
differences in the separated tissue and RBC images using the two methods. In patients,
the quality of the RBC image is easily affected by lower SNR, because of the
relatively lower signal of Xe129 in RBC than in tissue. More noise is included
in the RBC images reconstructed using the 3-point Dixon method than the new
2-point Dixon method. Figure 3 shows an example of this. This could at least partly explain the
slightly larger RBC-to-gas ratios from images reconstructed using the original
method, because more noise may be accounted as real signal. Conclusion
A new 2-point Dixon-based method is
implemented for separation of the Xe129 dissolved-phase components. Relatively
high consistency was found between the results obtained by this method and those
from the original 3-point Dixon-based method. This new method requires
acquisition of only two echoes of dissolved-phase data and provides
reconstructed images with inherently higher SNR compared to the 3-point
approach. The application of this method at 3T needs further investigation. The method should also be compared directly to
the 1-point Dixon approach.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Qing,
K., et al., Regional mapping of gas
uptake by blood and tissue in the human lung using hyperpolarized xenon-129
MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014. 39(2):
p. 346-59.
2. Kaushik,
S.S., et al., Single-breath clinical
imaging of hyperpolarized (129)Xe in the airspaces, barrier, and red blood
cells using an interleaved 3D radial 1-point Dixon acquisition. Magn Reson
Med, 2016. 75(4): p. 1434-43.
3. Myc,
L., et al., Characterisation of gas
exchange in COPD with dissolved-phase hyperpolarised xenon-129 MRI. Thorax,
2021. 76(2): p. 178-181.
4. Qing,
K., et al., Assessment of lung function
in asthma and COPD using hyperpolarized 129Xe chemical shift saturation
recovery spectroscopy and dissolved-phase MRI. NMR Biomed, 2014. 27(12): p. 1490-501.
5. Kaushik,
S.S., et al., Measuring diffusion
limitation with a perfusion-limited gas--hyperpolarized 129Xe gas-transfer
spectroscopy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Appl Physiol
(1985), 2014. 117(6): p. 577-85.
6. Ebner,
L., et al., The role of hyperpolarized
(129)xenon in MR imaging of pulmonary function. Eur J Radiol, 2017. 86: p. 343-352.
7. Wang, J.M., et al., Using hyperpolarized (129)Xe MRI to quantify
regional gas transfer in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax, 2018. 73(1): p. 21-28.