Jiaping Hu1, Zidong Zhou2,3, Junyi Peng2,3, Lijie Zhong1, Kexin Jiang1, Zhongping Zhang4, Lijun Lu2,3,5, and Xiaodong Zhang1
1Department of Medical Imaging, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, GuangZhou, China, 2School of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, GuangZhou, China, 3Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, 4Philips Healthcare, GuangZhou, China, 5Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Osteoarthritis, Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence
Identifying patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) whom the
disease will progress is critical in clinical practice. Currently, the
time-series information and interactions between the structures and sub-regions
of the whole knee are underused for predicting. Therefore, we propose a
temporal-structural graph convolutional network (TSGCN) using time-series data
of 194 cases and 406 OA comparators. Each sub-region was regarded as a vertex
and represented by the extracted radiomics features, the edges between vertexs
were established by the clinical prior knowledge. The multiple-modality TSGCN
(integrating information of MRIs, clinical and image-based semi-quantitative
score) performed best comparing to the radiomics and CNN model.
abstract
Purpose and Introduction Accurate discrimination of patients with knee OA who might progress
is essential for medicine development as well as implementing physical therapy.[1] It is
essential to predict knee OA progression from a spatio-temporal point of view.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is suitable for analyzing whole-knee,
compartmental morphological changes.[2, 3]
However, it can be complex and heterogeneous for radiologists to evaluate these
changes on MRI. Therefore, we propose a time structural-regions graph
convolutional network (TSGCN) that could handle complex structures by
generalizing the convolution operation from Euclidean space to non-Euclidean
graph space to achieve accurate progression prediction of knee OA. We also
built a multiple-modality TSGCN to explore the benefit of clinical variables
and image-based semi-quantitative features to improve the predicting
performance.
Materials and Methods
MRIs of 194 cases and 406 OA comparators were obtained from the FNIH
cohort in the Osteoarthritis Initiative and retrospectively included in this
study, with 194 knees progressing both in radiology and symptoms, and 406 knees
lacking the combination of radiographic and pain progression. Additionally, publicly
eligible records of MRI semi-quantitative imaging markers and clinical
variables were collected, which were detailed elsewhere.[4] Segmentation
was implemented by nnU-Net[5] to automatically segment the knee into 30 sub-regions according
to the MOAKS based on two MRI sequences:
sagittal intermediate-weighted turbo-spin echo sequences with fat-suppression
(SAG-IW-TSE-FS) and sagittal 3D dual‑echo steady state water excitation
(SAG-3D-DESS-WE). We used residual gated graph convolutional network [6], which leverages both the edge gating mechanism and residual
networks (ResNets) to formulate a multi-layer gated graph ConvNet, to describe
the relationship among different sub-regions and time-series of knee OA by
aggregating the vertex information across the knee graph. For it has been
proven to be efficient to adopt residual connection (jumping connection) in the
GCN layers [7]. An overall workflow and the details about TSGCN were shown in
figure 1 and 2 respectively. We also explored whether GNN scores combined with
semi-quantitative imaging markers and clinical variables (called multi-modality
TSGCN) would lead to better results through integration experiments. To further
illustrate the spatiotemporal processing ability and the prediction capacity of our model, we also constructed the radiomics model
and the CNN model for comparison. The deep learning model was trained using
Dense169 [8]. The Radiomics model was established using the minimum redundancy
maximum relevance (mRMR) algorithm and the least absolute shrinkage and
selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. The area under the curve (AUC) was used
as the model merit.
Results
Details of classification performance on DESS and IW modalities
based on different models are shown in table 1. The receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curves were shown in figure 3. The higher AUC of 0.805
(0.796) was achieved by the TSGCN on the SAG-3D-DESS-WE (SAG-IW-TSE-FS)
modality compared to the radiomics model of 0.712 (0.716) or the CNN model of
0.693 (0.667). Unsurprisingly, the multi-modality TSGCN achieved the highest
AUC of 0.845 on the SAG-3D-DESS-WE and 0.873 on the SAG-IW-TSE-FS,
outperforming only utilizing image modality (AUC of 0.805 on the SAG-3D-DESS-WE
and 0.796 on the SAG-IW-TSE-FS), semi-quantitative imaging markers (AUC of
0.632), or clinical variables (AUC of 0.701).
Conclusion
This investigation indicated the better advantage of the learned
specific regions and time-series by the time structural-regions graph
convolutional network (TSGCN) compared to the radiomics model and the CNN
model. Additional semi-quantitative imaging and clinical features improved the
prediction performance of knee OA progression. However, we inferred that the
image modality accounted for the main contribution of the proposed
multi-modality method.Acknowledgements
Not applicable.References
1. Guan B,
Liu F, Haj-Mirzaian A, Demehri S, Samsonov A, Neogi T, et al. Deep learning risk assessment models for predicting
progression of radiographic medial joint space loss over a 48-MONTH follow-up
period. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2020, 28(4): 428-437.
2. Eckstein
F, Burstein D, Link TM. Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative
changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed
2006, 19(7): 822-854.
3. Conaghan
PG, Felson D, Gold G, Lohmander S, Totterman S, Altman R. MRI and
non-cartilaginous structures in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006,
14 Suppl A: A87-94.
4. Hunter
DJ, Guermazi A, Lo GH, Grainger AJ, Conaghan PG, Boudreau RM, et al. Evolution of semi-quantitative
whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19(8): 990-1002.
5. Isensee
F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH. nnU-Net: a self-configuring
method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature methods 2021, 18(2): 203-211.
6. Bresson
X, Laurent T. Residual Gated Graph ConvNets. CoRR 2017,
abs/1711.07553.
7. Xu
K, Li C, Tian Y, Sonobe T, Kawarabayashi KI, Jegelka S. Representation Learning
on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networks.
arXiv; 2018; 2018.
8. Huang
G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ. Densely connected convolutional
networks. Proceedings of the IEEE
conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2017; 2017. p.
4700-4708.