Chong Chen1, Yingmin Liu2, Yu Ding3, Mathew Tong4, Yuchi Han4, and Rizwan Ahmad5
1Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State Univerity, Columbus, OH, United States, 2Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio Sate University, Columbus, OH, United States, 3Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 4Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Colubmus, OH, United States, 5Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio Sate University, Columbus, OH, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Artifacts, Artifacts
We propose a novel method to automatically identify and
discard coils that strongly contribute to image artifacts. This is achieved by
projecting coil images to the space spanned by the ESPIRiT coil sensitivity
maps. The proposed method is evaluated using the real-time cine data collected
from twelve volunteers during exercise. The artifacts in the reconstructed
real-time cine images are suppressed significantly with the proposed coil
selection method.
Background
In exercise
stress CMR, compressive sensing (CS) based real-time cine (RT-Cine) imaging has
been used to assess cardiac function with acceptable spatial and temporal
resolution [1]. However, significant movement
of body coils during exercise can degrade image quality due to the temporal
varying coil sensitively maps. The artifacts caused by the coil movement are
also visible in the temporally averaged coil images. To suppress the motion
artifacts, the k-space from certain coils can be excluded by visual inspection
of the coil images. However, visual inspection is not practical for routine
use. In this abstract, we propose a method to automatically identify coils that
introduce a high level of artifacts to the reconstructed image. Using the
exercise real-time cine data collected from 12 volunteers, we demonstrate that
the motion artifacts in the reconstructed real-time cine images are suppressed
significantly with the proposed coil selection algorithm.Method
Twelve healthy volunteers were scanned under free-breathing conditions
using a prototype bSSFP RT-Cine sequence on a 3T scanner (Vida, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The volunteers were instructed to exercise on a
supine cycle ergometer (Lode BV, Netherlands) with resistances 20 W, 40 W, and 60
W respectively. 14-slice short-axis (SAX) stack covering the whole heart and a two-chamber
(2CH)) slice were acquired at each exercise stage using an 18-channel body
array coil combined with a 12-channel posterior spine array coil, resulting in
30 channels. The other imaging parameters are: TE/TR 1.1/2.55—1.29/2.9 ms, flip
angle 29-44 degrees, spatial resolution 1.82x1.82—2.27x2.27 mm2, temporal resolution 35.7-50.2 ms,
acquisition time 3-6 s/slice and acceleration rate 7-8 with GRO [2] sampling
pattern.
Typically,
the RT-Cine data collected at 40 W or 60 W have severe motion artifacts and
were used to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. We first averaged
the k-space of all the frames to generate the time-averaged coil image $$$\{x_i\}_{i=1}^N$$$. Then,
the coil images were projected to the the space spanned by the ESPIRiT [3] coil
sensitivity maps $$$\{S_i\}_{i=1}^N$$$: $$\tilde{x}_i = \left( \sum_{n=1}^N x_n S_n^* \right) S_i $$ where $$$\{\tilde{x}_i\}_{i=1}^N$$$ are the projected images and $$$ N $$$ is the number of coils. Fig. 1 shows the
images from two physical coils, one (coil-4) with significant motion artifacts
and the other (coil-11) without. The difference between $$$x_i$$$ and $$$\tilde{x}_i$$$ can be mainly attributed to motion
artifacts. We propose to use the residual signal $$$ \| \tilde{x}_i - x_i \|_2 $$$ to identify the coils that strongly contribute
to image artifacts.
The five physical coils with the highest values of $$$ \| \tilde{x}_i - x_i \|_2 $$$ were automatically discarded before the reconstruction.
The data from the remaining coils were compressed to 12 virtual coils and
reconstructed using a parameter-free SENSE-based CS method SCoRe [4]. For
comparison, the data without coil selection were also reconstructed using the
same method. The RT-Cine images reconstructed using both methods from each
volunteer were visually scored by two cardiologists in terms of the level of image
artifact in the cardiac region. The images were scored using a five-point
scale: 1--Unusable, 2--Severe artifacts obscuring useful information, 3--Moderate
artifacts with some loss of information but still diagnostic, 4--Minor
artifacts with minimal loss of information, 5--No artifacts.Results and Discussion
Fig. 2 shows the time-averaged images and the residual
signal which cannot be characterized using one set of ESPIRiT coil sensitivity
maps from a representative dataset. As highlighted by the red circle and boxes,
the proposed method successfully identifies the coils with a high level of
motion artifacts. Fig. 3 demonstrates the representative RT-Cine images of 2CH
and SAX views, where Fig. 3a and 3c show images reconstructed using all the
physical coils, and Fig. 3b and 3d show images after automatic coil selection. Even
though there was some signal loss due to the coil rejection, especially on the
chest wall, the motion artifacts were reduced significantly as highlighted by
the red arrows. The temporal profiles across the heart are also displayed, demonstrating
that the artifacts inside the blood pool and the myocardium are both
suppressed. Results from visual scoring of image quality by two cardiologists
are listed in Table 1. The image quality reconstructed with coil selection (4.4±0.7)
was better than that without coil selection (3.6±0.8).Conclusion
By projecting the time-averaged
images to the space spanned by the ESPIRiT coil sensitivity maps, we propose a
method to automatically identify the coils with a high level of artifacts. We
demonstrate that the proposed method can reduce motion artifacts in the reconstructed
RT-Cine images.Acknowledgements
This
work was funded by NIH project R01HL151697References
[1] C. Chen et al. SCMR 2019 Abstract #550349
[2] M. Joshi Et al. arXiv:2206.03630
[3] M. Uecker et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 71 (3), 990–1001
(2014).
[4] R. Ahmad et al. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging 1 (4),
220-235 (2015)