Diana Bencikova1, Martin A. Cloos2, Veronika Janacova1, Siegfried Trattnig1,3,4,5, and Vladimir Juras1
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2University of Queensland, Queensland, Austria, 3CD Laboratory for MR Imaging Biomarkers (BIOMAK), Vienna, Austria, 4Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria, 5Karl Landsteiner Society, Institute for Clinical Molecular MRI in the Musculoskeletal System, Vienna, Austria
Synopsis
Keywords: Cartilage, MR Fingerprinting, MSK, MR value, Osteoarthritis, Quantitative Imaging, Relaxometry
Quantitative
MRI has been shown to be sensitive to early stages of cartilage degeneration in
osteoarthritis, but conventional MRI techniques can measure only single
parameter at a time. This poses time constraints and co-registration challenges.
With MR Fingerprinting, multiple parameters can be assessed within single
measurement. Here, we evaluated prototype MRF sequence in NIST phantom and
healthy volunteers in combination with automatic cartilage segmentation
procedure and compared to conventional techniques. We could show that the
values provided by MRF sequence agreed with the values provided by conventional
techniques. Therefore MRF is accurate and practical diagnosis tool for
articular cartilage examination.
Introduction
Quantitative
MRI may be able to detect early stages of cartilage degeneration in
osteoarthritis (OA) [1]. Conventional quantitative MRI techniques can
measure only a single parameter at a time. This makes it challenging to collect
multiple parameters within a reasonable measurement time and necessitates
extensive post-processing to co-register the individual data sets. It is
possible to overcome these problems with MR fingerprinting (MRF), which can
obtain multiple parameters within one single scan and recently has been
demonstrated in cartilage application [2]. The goal of this study was to evaluate the
accuracy and feasibility of a prototype MRF sequence to acquire T1 and T2
values in phantoms and in cartilage in combination with automatic cartilage segmentation
procedure.Methods
All measurements were performed on
a 3T MR scanner (Prismafit, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The prototype
MR Fingerprinting sequence based on [3]
was compared to conventional multi-echo spin-echo sequence (CPMG, measurement
parameters: TR = 1420 ms, turbo factor = 8, Te range = 13.8 – 110.4 ms. FOV = 200×200
mm2, matrix = 384×384, FA = 180˚, ST = 5.5 mm, total acq time 4:48 min) to
evaluate T2 values, and to volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence
(VIBE, measurement parameters: TR = 15 ms, Te = 2.47 ms, FOV = 200×200 mm2,
matrix = 768×768, FA = 5˚, ST = 5 mm, total acq time 1:04 min) to evaluate the
T1 values. Double-echo steady-state sequence (DESS, measurement parameters: TR
= 14.1 ms, Te = 5 ms, FOV = 160x160mm2, matrix = 241x256, FA = 25 ˚, ST = 0.6 mm,
total acq time = 5.58 min) was measured to obtain automatic segmentation of the
cartilage layers via the MR ChondralHealth prototype (Siemens, Erlangen,
Germany).
First, the NIST phantom, containing
an array of spheres with different T1 and T2 values, was scanned to analyze the
accuracy of the MRF sequence. Circular ROIs from the individual elements of T1
and T2 arrays were delineated on the slice with the biggest cross-section of
the spheres. The T2 and T1 values were then extracted from the conventional and
MRF T2 and T1 maps and compared via regression analysis.
Subsequently, ten volunteers (mean age 33.2 ± 12.8 years old, 4 men and 6 women) were scanned
to obtain in vivo data of knee articular cartilage. A radiologist with 30 years
of experience in knee cartilage MRI reviewed the morphological knee MR exams of
these volunteers to rule out any pathologies. Automatic segmentation,
dividing the cartilage into 21 segments (6 patellar, 6 tibial and 9 femoral),
was performed and MRF, CPMG and VIBE-T1 images were resamples and co-registered
with the DESS images and segmentation. Extreme values, presumed to be noise biased, were masked out of the segmentation and values from each segment were extracted. The coefficients of determination between the MRF and
conventional methods were assessed.Results
The results of the NIST phantom are
depicted in Figure 1 (T2 array) and Figure 2 (T1 array). The T2 values of the
MRF sequence are capped at approx. 330ms, since such high values don’t occur in
articular cartilage. Spheres with those values are omitted from further
analysis. Both, the MRF and CPMG T2 values, are compared to the reference
values provided by the manufacturer (considered as ground truth). It can be
observed that the MRF T2 values follow the reference values closer than CPMG T2
values. The coefficient of determination between the CPMG and reference and between the MRF and reference T2 values were r2 = 0.979 and r2 = 0.999, respectively. The coefficients of
determination of the full range of T1 values between the T1 map and reference,
and between the MRF T1 and reference values were r2 = 0.999 in both
cases.
Nine out of ten volunteers had
healthy knee articular cartilage. One volunteer (58y woman) had an early-stage
cartilage degeneration in the superior-medial patellar cartilage. All automatic
segmentations were successful. Figure 3 depicts a representative slice of the
DESS volume with the segmentation result, CPMG and MRF T2 maps, as well as VIBE
and MRF T1 maps. In figure 4, the scatterplots between CPMG and MRF T2 values
from individual cartilage segments with the regression lines are depicted for
each volunteer. The coefficients of determination ranged from 0.263 to 0.747 (mean
r2 = 0.492).
In figure 5, the CPMG and MRF T2 maps of patellar
cartilage of a focal cartilage lesion are overlaid on the T2-weighted (CPMG)
and proton-density (MRF) images. The arrows point to a hyper-intense area,
indicating increased T2 values as a result of cartilage degeneration.Discussion
We have shown that using
the phantom there is very high correlation between T1 and T2 values obtained
from the conventional and MRF sequences. Although visually the conventional and
MRF in vivo T1 and T2 maps were undoubtedly similar, the correlation in
automatically segmented cartilage regions remarkably varied between the
subjects. The main reason could be the challenging image registration of
differently resolved quantitative maps to the DESS sequence due to complex
anatomy of the knee joint and relatively low cartilage thickness. Conclusion
MRF in the knee cartilage in combination with automatic segmentation is feasible and can be used in future clinical studies.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) KLI917.References
[1] Li
X, Benjamin Ma C, Link TM et al (2007) In vivo T(1rho) and T(2) mapping of
articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee using 3 T MRI. Osteoarthritis
Cartilage 15:789-797
[2] Sharafi A, Zibetti MVW, Chang G,
Cloos M, Regatte RR (2020) MR fingerprinting for rapid simultaneous T1 , T2 ,
and T1 rho relaxation mapping of the human articular cartilage at 3T. Magn
Reson Med 84:2636-2644
[3] Cloos MA, Asslander J, Abbas B et
al (2019) Rapid Radial T1 and T2 Mapping of the Hip Articular Cartilage With
Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:810-815