Sen Jia1, Lixian Zou1, Zhilang Qiu2, Yongquan Ye3, Haifeng Wang1, Chao Zou1, Ye Li1, Jian Xu3, Xin Liu1, Hairong Zheng1, and Dong Liang1,4
1Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China, 2Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3UIH America, Houston, TX, United States, 4Medical AI Research Center, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Relaxometry, Susceptibility
The MULTIPLEX technique could quantify the
T1/T2*/PD/Susceptibility maps in a single 3D scan but leads to a long scan
time due to the dual-TR, dual-flip angle, and multi-echo signal acquisition
strategy. Wave-CAIPI acceleration with SENSE reconstruction
is limited by noise amplification at high acceleration factors and is susceptible to artifacts from
inaccurate coil sensitivity maps. This work develops a L1 regularized Wave-SPIRiT reconstruction to achieve 9-fold accelerated MULTIPLEX imaging in 3 minutes. The L1 regularized coil-by-coil reconstruction also benefits the Multi-Dimensional Integration (MDI) quantification to achieve comparable
accuracy and robustness as the reference
scan with 55% reduction of scan time.
Introduction
The MULTI-Parametric MR imaging with fLEXible
design technique (MULTIPLEX) could quantify the T1/T2*/PD/susceptibility maps and produces qualitative augmented T1/susceptibility-weighted images (aT1w/SWI) jointly
in a single 3D scan 1. However, the dual-TR, dual-flip angle and multi-echo
signal acquisition strategy leads to a long scan time and limits the achievable
spatial resolution 1. The Wave-CAIPI acceleration with SENSE
reconstruction could reduce undersampled artifacts and reconstruction noise for
highly accelerated 3D imaging 2,3. However, its noise reduction capability is determined by the applied wave gradient amplitude, which is strictly limited by the maximum slew rate of the gradient system, especially in the high-resolution imaging
scenarios with high bandwidth readout 3,4. Moreover, the
SENSE reconstruction for Wave-CAIPI is vulnerable to artifacts induced by the calibration errors and phase nonlinearity in the coil sensitivity maps (CSM) 5,6. Methods
This work develops a joint sparsity/L1 7
regularized, coil-by-coil SPIRiT 8 reconstruction model for
Wave-CAIPI sampling (i.e., L1-Wave-SPIRiT) to achieve 9-fold accelerated
MULTIPLEX imaging without the need of estimating CSM:
$$\min_{x_i, i=1:R_z}||(G_i-I)x_i||_2^2 + \alpha||A{F_x}^{-1}{{P_{sf}}^i}{F_x}x_i-I_a||_2^2+\mu\sum_{i=1}^{R_z}||Wx_i||_{\bf{Joint}\bf{\it{l}_1}}$$
where $$$x_i, i=1:R_z$$$ denote the unknown multi-coil images of $$$R_z$$$ slices which are aliased together by the $$$R_z$$$-fold undersampling
in the $$$k_z$$$ dimension, $$$G_i$$$ denotes the image domain SPIRiT kernel of each aliased slice, $$$I$$$ denotes the identity operator, $$${P_{sf}}^i$$$ denotes the point spread function (PSF)
characterizing the Wave sampling, $$$F_x$$$ and $$${F_x}^{-1}$$$ denote the Fourier transform (FT) along the $$$k_x$$$ dimension and its inverse, $$$A$$$ represents the image aliasing induced by CAIPI
undersampling in the $$$k_y$$$ and $$$k_z$$$ dimensions, $$$I_a$$$ denotes the aliased image calculated by inverse
FT of the Wave-CAIPI accelerated k-space data, $$$W$$$ denotes the 2D Wavelet transform (Daubechies is utilized in this work),
and $$${\parallel\cdot\parallel}_{\bf{Joint}\it{l_1}}$$$ denotes the joint sparsity model for
multi-coil images. The L1-Wave-SPIRiT model is solved iteratively by the ADMM
algorithm. The regularization weight of data consistency term is set to $$$\alpha =0.6$$$, while the sparsity regularization weight $$$\mu$$$ varies between 1.8e-3 and 2.6e-3 according to the different signal-to-noise levels of multi-echo images. The coil-by-coil reconstruction with noise alleviation by L1 regularization also benefits the subsequent
multi-dimensional integration (MDI) 9 quantification strategy by fully
utilizing the dimensional orthogonality of multi-dimensional MR signals, improving the quantification accuracy and robustness. 1,9,10
In-vivo experiments were IRB-approved, with written informed consent
obtained from three healthy volunteers. All 9-fold Wave-CAIPI accelerated
MULTIPLEX scans (TA = 3 min 3 sec) were performed on a 3T scanner (uMR 790, United
Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai) with a 32-channel head coil. Each subject also
underwent a 4-fold CAIPI accelerated MULTIPLEX scan (TA = 6 min 52 sec), serving as
the reference for image quality evaluation. The SPIRiT kernel and Wave PSF were estimated from the calibration data acquired separately in 3 seconds. The other
scan parameters were reported in Figure 1. The reconstructed multi-coil
images were fed into the MDI quantification framework to obtain quantitative T1/T2*/R2*/QSM
maps and qualitative SWI/aT1w images.Results
Figure 2 illustrates that the proposed L1-Wave-SPIRiT model could effectively reduce the noise amplification in the multi-echo images of the 9-fold
accelerated MULTIPLEX data. Figure 3 demonstrates the improvement by L1-Wave-SPIRiT on the quantification accuracy of T1/T2*/R2*/Susceptibility maps, and on the visual signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) of qualitative aT1w/SWI images. In
Figure 4, the T2* mapping by MDI with coil-uncombined complex images outperforms
MDI with images combined by SENSE or
sum-of-squares, and the conventional two-parameter T2* exponential fitting, especially
in the low SNR region. Finally, Figure 5 demonstrates that the proposed L1-Wave-SPIRiT
reconstruction with MDI quantification for the 9-fold accelerated MULTIPLEX data
could achieve comparable quantification accuracy and qualitative image SNR as the
reference scan, reducing the scan time by 55%.Discussion
This work develops a L1 regularized Wave SPIRiT reconstruction model for Wave-CAIPI sampling and achieves 9-fold acceleration of the MULTIPLEX scan with remarkable reduction of
reconstruction noise. The coil-by-coil image reconstruction with reduced noise further
benefits the subsequent multi-dimensional integration based multi-parametric quantification
by fully utilizing the dimensional orthogonality. The proposed L1-Wave-SPIRiT
acceleration could achieve comparable quantification accuracy and qualitative
signal-to-noise ratio as the reference MULTIPLEX scan with a 55% reduction of
scan time. Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81830056) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81801691).References
- Ye Y, Lyu J, Hu Y, Zhang
Z, Xu J, Zhang W. MULTI-parametric MR imaging with fLEXible
design (MULTIPLEX). Magn Reson Med. 2021; 87: 658– 673.
- Bilgic B, Gagoski BA, Cauley SF, et al.
Wave-CAIPI for highly accelerated 3D imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2015, 73:
2152-2162.
- Polak D, Cauley
S, Huang SY, et al. Highly-accelerated volumetric brain examination using
optimized wave-CAIPI encoding. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019, 50: 961-974.
- Qiu Z, Jia S, Su S, et
al. Highly accelerated parallel MRI using wave encoding and virtual
conjugate coils. Magn Reson Med. 2021; 86: 1345– 1359.
- Schwarz JM, Pracht ED, Brenner
D, Reuter M, Stöcker T. GRAPPA reconstructed wave-CAIPI MP-RAGE
at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2018; 80: 2427– 2438.
- Jia S, Qiu Z, Zhang L, et al. Aliasing-free reduced field-of-view parallel imaging. Magn
Reson Med. 2022; 87: 1574– 1582.
- Murphy M, Alley M, Demmel J, et al. Fast
l1-SPIRiT Compressed Sensing Parallel Imaging MRI: Scalable Parallel
Implementation and Clinically Feasible Runtime. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging
2012, 31:1250-1262.
- Lustig M and Pauly JM. SPIRiT: Iterative
self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space.
Magn Reson Med. 2010, 64: 457-471.
- Ye Y, Lyu J, Sun W, et al. A
multi-dimensional integration (MDI) strategy for MR T2*
mapping. NMR in Biomedicine 2021; 34:e4529.
- Ye Y, Lyu J, Hu Y, et al. Augmented
T1-weighted steady state magnetic resonance imaging. NMR in
Biomedicine 2022; 35:e4729.
- Walsh DO, Gmitro AF, Marcellin MW. Adaptive
reconstruction of phased array MR imagery. Magn Reson Med. 2000, 43:
682-690.