Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Liver, Machine Learning, Segmentation
This work focuses on an empirical approach to determine water T1 from multiparametric MR images, including T1, PDFF and T2* maps. To this end, a multiple linear regression model was fit to describe the deviation in MOLLI T1 based on PDFF and T2* values, which were measured in phantoms built at increasing lipids and iron content. This method was validated on a cohort of healthy volunteers and diabetes subjects (n=45). Further investigations were conducted to elucidate the relationship between MOLLI T1 values, before and after correction for hepatic lipid and iron content, and liver stiffness measured by MR elastography.
[1] European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016 Jun;64(6):1388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Apr 7. PMID: 27062661.
[2] Schaapman JJ, Tushuizen ME, Coenraad MJ, Lamb HJ. Multiparametric MRI in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jun;53(6):1623-1631. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27292. Epub 2020 Aug 21. PMID: 32822095; PMCID: PMC8247423.
[3] Banerjee R, Pavlides M, Tunnicliffe EM, Piechnik SK, Sarania N, Philips R, Collier JD, Booth JC, Schneider JE, Wang LM, Delaney DW, Fleming KA, Robson MD, Barnes E, Neubauer S. Multiparametric magnetic resonance for the non-invasive diagnosis of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014 Jan;60(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 12. PMID: 24036007; PMCID: PMC3865797.
[4] Tunnicliffe EM, Banerjee R, Pavlides M, Neubauer S, Robson MD. A model for hepatic fibrosis: the competing effects of cell loss and iron on shortened modified Look-Locker inversion recovery T1 (shMOLLI-T1 ) in the liver. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Feb;45(2):450-462. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25392. Epub 2016 Jul 23. PMID: 27448630.2.
[5] Küstner T, Hepp T, Fischer M, Schwartz M, Fritsche A, Häring HU, Nikolaou K, Bamberg F, Yang B, Schick F, Gatidis S, Machann J. Fully Automated and Standardized Segmentation of Adipose Tissue Compartments via Deep Learning in 3D Whole-Body MRI of Epidemiologic Cohort Studies. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Oct 28;2(6):e200010. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020200010. PMID: 33937847; PMCID: PMC8082356.
[6] Kellman P, Hansen MS. T1-mapping in the heart: accuracy and precision. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Jan 4;16(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-16-2. PMID: 24387626; PMCID: PMC3927683.
[7] Dennis A, Kelly MD, Fernandes C, Mouchti S, Fallowfield JA, Hirschfield G, Pavlides M, Harrison S, Chakravarthy MV, Banerjee R, Sanyal A. Correlations Between MRI Biomarkers PDFF and cT1 With Histopathological Features of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 27;11:575843. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.575843. PMID: 33584535; PMCID: PMC7877451
Fig. 1 Image processing pipeline for the quantification of liver T1
Schematic representation of the image processing pipeline used for (1) liver volume segmentation and (2) for the quantification of liver T1. In the first step, the liver masks are automatically segmented by a pre-trained 3D-convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) or by manual segmentation of liver. For the quantification, the steps include image alignment of multi-echo 3D-GRE images and MOLLI T1 maps following correction of T1 using PDFF and maps as reference for the presence of hepatic lipids and iron deposition.
Fig. 2: Effect of iron and fat on MOLLI T1 on phantoms
(A) Multiparametric MR images for each set of phantoms at increasing iron oxide(III) concentration (0-75 μg Fe/mL) and peanut oil percentage (0-20 %) together with the MOLLI T1 (ms) and the PDFF (%) and T2* (ms). (B) In the graph the MOLLI T1 values are plotted against the IR-STEAM T1 values. (C) The Bland-Altman plots shows the differences between IR-STEAM and MOLLI T1 values aganist the mean. The plots show the respective gradients of T2* and PDFF measured at different iron (left, blues dots) and lipid content (right, red dots).
Fig. 3: Determination of water T1 in vivo measurements
(A) Multiparametric MR images including uncorrected and corrected T1 (ms), PDFF (%) and T2* (ms) maps with low or high iron and hepatic lipid content. The Bland-Altman plots display the differences between the IR-STEAM and (B) the uncorrected and (C) the corrected MOLLI T1 values agaist the mean values. The mean (red lines) and the limits of agreement (blue lines) are shown along with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the uncorrected (ICC=0.18 [−0.09, 0.44]) and the corrected T1 values (ICC=0.60 [0.37, 0.76]).
Fig. 4: Segmentation and quantification of liver T1
(A) Representative liver mask produced by the CNN model with 0.89 of Dice score. The true positive (TP, light grey), true negative (TN, light green) and false negative (FN, light purple) pixels are displayed throughout the liver parenchyma. (B) The Bland-Altman plot shows the difference between the liver T1 (ms) obtained either from manual delineation of liver contours or using a 3D-CNN against the mean values. The respective intraclass correlation coefficient between the two methods are displayed (ICC=1.0 [1.0, 1.0]).
Fig. 5: Effect of T1 correction on the correlation with liver stiffness
(A) Correlation between MOLLI T1 (ms) and PDFF (%). The Pearson's r correlation coefficient are shown for uncorrected (r=0.84, P<0.0001), only iron-corrected ( r=0.85, P<0.0001) and iron- and fat-corrected MOLLI T1 (r=-0.07, P=0.64) and IR-STEAM T1 (r=0.28, P=0.07). (B) Correlation of the MOLLI T1 and liver stiffness (kPa) with coefficients shown for the uncorrected (r=0.43, P=0.01), iron-corrected (r=0.44, P=0.01), iron- and fat-corrected MOLLI T1 (r=0.05, P=0.77) and IR-STEAM T1 (r=0.34, P=0.05).