Preethi S Chandrasekaran1, Chong Chen2, Yingmin Liu1, Christopher Crabtree3, Syed Murtaza Arshad4, Matthew Tong5, Yuchi Han5, and Rizwan Ahmad2
1Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 2Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 3Department of Human Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 4Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 5Cardiovascular Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Heart, Velocity & Flow, Exercise CMR
A
comprehensive exercise stress cardiovascular MRI (Ex-CMR) was performed in twelve
healthy subjects. Biventricular quantification was performed from real-time
cine, while hemodynamic parameters in the ascending aorta and main pulmonary
artery were estimated using real-time flow. The acquisition process was
repeated two to three times at increasing exercise intensities. The highly
accelerated (R = 7-8 for cine and R = 16 for flow) real-time data were
reconstructed inline using Gadgetron-based compressed sensing reconstruction. In
agreement with the literature, the ejection fraction and cardiac output correlated
positively with exercise intensity.
Introduction
Exercise stress Cardiovascular MRI (Ex-CMR) may improve risk assessment and early diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Exercise is preferred over pharmacologic stress because the level of exercise provides prognostic information. Despite the commercial availability of in-magnet supine ergometers, acquiring and processing Ex-CMR data remains technically challenging due to high heart rates, rapid and exaggerated breathing motion, unreliable ECG signal, limited time window to collect data, and degraded image quality. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of acquiring real-time cine (RT-Cine), real-time aortic and pulmonic flow (RT-Flow) from twelve healthy volunteers at multiple stages of exercise. This is accomplished by leveraging (i) highly accelerated RT-Cine and RT-Flow imaging, (ii) compressed sensing-based inline reconstruction, (iii) data-driven heart-rate estimation, (iv) and utilization of multiple coil sensitivity maps to suppress artifacts. In this preliminary study, we report biventricular function as well as aortic and pulmonic peak velocities.Methods
Twelve healthy volunteers (10 male, 28±7 years; BMI: 19.5–32.7 kg/m2)
were scanned under free-breathing conditions using prototype RT-Cine [1] and
RT-Flow [2] sequences on a 3T scanner (Vida, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen,
Germany). Volunteers were imaged at rest and during exercise with a supine
cycle ergometer (Lode BV, Netherlands) at workloads of 20 W, 40 W, and 60 W (nine
subjects). At each stage, a shot-axis (SAX) stack of RT-Cine covering the whole
heart as well as ascending aortic (AAo) and main pulmonary artery (MPA) RT-Flow images
were acquired. Imaging was initiated 60 s after each increment of resistance to
stabilize the heart rate. Fourteen slices were acquired in RT-Cine with Golden
Ratio Offset sampling pattern [3] with the following imaging parameters: 6 mm
slices for scanning duration of 3 s/slice, TE: (1.1–1.29) ms; TR: (2.55–2.9) ms; acceleration: 7-8; spatial resolution of reconstructed images: (1.82x1.82)
mm2 to (2.27x2.27) mm2; temporal resolution: (35.7–50.2) ms, with only one subject above 50 ms; flip angle: (29–44)º. Three parallel
slices (7.2 mm apart) of AO/MPA RT-Flow were acquired to accommodate the
potential through-plane motion with the following imaging parameters: TE/TR:
2.13/3.58 ms; acceleration: 16; spatial resolution: (2x2) mm2 to (2.75x2.75)
mm2; temporal resolution: 43 ms; flip angle: 10º; velocity encoding:
150 cm/s at rest and 250 cm/s at exercise.
Data were reconstructed inline with
Gadgetron-based implementation of SCoRe [4], a parameter-free SENSE-based
compressive sensing method. The reconstructed cine/flow images were analyzed in
suiteHEART software (NeoSoft LLC, Pewaukee, WI). To quantify cardiac function,
short-axis contours were automatically generated from RT-Cine images and then
visually assessed frame-by-frame and modified manually when necessary.
Background phase correction was applied on RT-Flow images using a second-order
weighted regularized least squares fitting [5]. Then, peak velocity and flow of
the ascending aorta at the root level (AAo) and main pulmonary artery (MPA)
were quantified using all available complete heartbeats in eleven volunteers. The
heart rate at each stage was calculated from the RT-Flow images and then used
to calculate the cardiac output.Results
Cardiac
function when tracked from rest to exercise show that end-diastolic volume is
relatively stable in both ventricles (Fig. 1a and 2a), whereas end-systolic
volume decreases (Fig. 1b and 2b), stroke volume (Fig. 1c-1e and 2c-2e), ejection
fraction, and cardiac output increase with exercise. Peak velocity and cardiac
output in AAo and MAP were seen to increase (Fig. 3a,c,d,f); however, the stroke
volume remained relatively stable (Fig. 3b,3e). Representative images of RT-Cine
and RT-Flow from one volunteer are shown in Fig. 4 and 5.Discussion
RT-Cine
acquisitions with 14 slices cover the whole heart; however, with exaggerated respiratory
motion under exercise, the heart location changes from slice to slice, which
can lead to additional variation in the quantification of volumes. In addition,
we noticed a degradation in image quality in the basal-most slices due to motion,
flow, and field inhomogeneity artifacts. These artifacts were partially
suppressed using two sets of sensitivity maps [6]. We anticipate further
improvement in the image quality and cardiac function quantification by
increasing acquisition time and quantifying the heartbeat in the end-expiratory
phase [7].Conclusion
A
comprehensive multi-stage real-time exercise protocol was successfully executed
in healthy volunteers. The overall image quality was acceptable for
quantification and the results are in agreement with the values reported in the
literature [8, 9].Acknowledgements
This
work was funded by NIH project R01HL151697.References
- C. Chen
et al. ISMRM 2018 Abstract #4894
- C. Chen
et al. SCMR 2020 Abstract #751158
- M. Joshi
et al. arXiv:2206.03630
- R. Ahmad
et al. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging 1 (4), 220-235 (2015)
- A.
Pruitt et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 81:2424–2438 (2019)
- M.
Uecker et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 71(3): 990–1001 (2014)
- C. Chen
et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 87:1595–1604 (2021)
- T.P.
Craven et al. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 37:685–698
(2021)
- R.I. Beaudry et
al. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 315: R638–R645 (2018)